<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Padilla Guilty Verdict Being Called a Tainted Victory for Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://americaswatchtower.com/2007/08/19/padilla-guilty-verdict-being-called-a-tainted-victory-for-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://americaswatchtower.com/2007/08/19/padilla-guilty-verdict-being-called-a-tainted-victory-for-bush/</link>
	<description>I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations. James Madison</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: quantumd</title>
		<link>http://americaswatchtower.com/2007/08/19/padilla-guilty-verdict-being-called-a-tainted-victory-for-bush/#comment-7608</link>
		<dc:creator>quantumd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpinkeyes.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/padilla-guilty-verdict-being-called-a-tainted-victory-for-bush/#comment-7608</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t even get it, what you are complaining about, if you use unconstitutional means to lock up terrorists how is that not a stain on the verdict?

I agree with the verdict, but the bush administration obviously fuked up by trying to go around Padilla rights. In law history this will go down as an example of how NOT to prosecute cases against terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t even get it, what you are complaining about, if you use unconstitutional means to lock up terrorists how is that not a stain on the verdict?</p>
<p>I agree with the verdict, but the bush administration obviously fuked up by trying to go around Padilla rights. In law history this will go down as an example of how NOT to prosecute cases against terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinionnation</title>
		<link>http://americaswatchtower.com/2007/08/19/padilla-guilty-verdict-being-called-a-tainted-victory-for-bush/#comment-7483</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinionnation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpinkeyes.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/padilla-guilty-verdict-being-called-a-tainted-victory-for-bush/#comment-7483</guid>
		<description>well we can&#039;t have any victories for Bush, now can we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well we can&#8217;t have any victories for Bush, now can we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
