Comments on: New Hampshire to Revisit the Parental Notification Law http://americaswatchtower.com/2008/02/17/new-hampshire-to-revisit-the-parental-notification-law/ I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations- James Madison Sat, 02 Jun 2012 10:42:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Gary http://americaswatchtower.com/2008/02/17/new-hampshire-to-revisit-the-parental-notification-law/#comment-16668 Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:25:51 +0000 http://mpinkeyes.wordpress.com/?p=1466#comment-16668 Not being an OB/ GYN but still being married w/ a child I think the answer would be obvious around the 2nd trimester. i.e. When the mother would also be showing.

It would be better if there was a written letter of medical necessity provided but then someone would have to pay for the child’s trip to the doctor. Oh, yeah. That’s right, the parents would foot that bill.

]]> By: mpinkeyes http://americaswatchtower.com/2008/02/17/new-hampshire-to-revisit-the-parental-notification-law/#comment-16661 Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:45:11 +0000 http://mpinkeyes.wordpress.com/?p=1466#comment-16661 It will be a different story then, won’t it TRM.
Gary, good point, this whole “when the life of the mother is in danger” argument is nothing but an out for pregnant women who want to use that as an excuse. That is the only reason that provision is in there. If a mother’s life is trully in danger, I can understand her decision, but in this case it is simply a way for underage girls to sneak around behind their parent’s backs. How often can it be detremined that the mother’s life is in danger before it is obvious to everyone including her parents that she is pregnant?

]]> By: Gary http://americaswatchtower.com/2008/02/17/new-hampshire-to-revisit-the-parental-notification-law/#comment-16654 Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:30:37 +0000 http://mpinkeyes.wordpress.com/?p=1466#comment-16654 Pink,

There is another level to this. In the court systems, “for the life of the mother” has been distorted into meaning for the emotional life, for the mental health life, and any other potential distortion to take it away from the meaning of the pregnancy will be fatal to the physical life of the mother. Until the laws specify the mortal danger to the physical life of the mother, then the laws are meaningless as a free for all w/ a BS reason attached.

So once again, the refrain is the same. We wouldn’t have so many issues if we would actually follow the existing laws in place.

]]> By: TRM http://americaswatchtower.com/2008/02/17/new-hampshire-to-revisit-the-parental-notification-law/#comment-16647 Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:26:49 +0000 http://mpinkeyes.wordpress.com/?p=1466#comment-16647 Well pink sounds like Gov Lynch is a scumbag leftist who should have his ass beat….

He’s got three kids, I think two are daughters…. let’s see how he feels when his daughters become interested in boys…

]]>