Comments on: Homeland Security Classifies Returning US Veterans as Potential Terrorist Threat

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 07 May 2012 16:23:01 +0000

yeah I remember when I took my oath, to suppoet and defent the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, forign and DOMESTIC

By: Kay Simpson

Kay Simpson — Mon, 07 May 2012 10:52:07 +0000

This isn’t about people like you. This is about the FEW that are JT Ready and those like HIM.

By: Kay Simpson

Kay Simpson — Mon, 07 May 2012 10:50:40 +0000

This is not about ALL who served. This is about a few VERY extreme, right-wing people. It is about those few like JT Ready. Google it.

By: Kay Simpson

Kay Simpson — Mon, 07 May 2012 10:48:21 +0000

Because you have to be out of the military to be a vet? And he was still active duty.

By: Kay Simpson

Kay Simpson — Mon, 07 May 2012 10:42:31 +0000

Well, they may be reading, but not comprehending…

By: Kay Simpson

Kay Simpson — Mon, 07 May 2012 10:41:00 +0000

True, and everyone is taking this personally about them when they aren’t told by Fox news that there are ex-Marines, like JT Ready, that ARE extreme right wing and homeland terrorists. That does not mean ALL vets are terrorists. Google JT Ready for an eye opener. Ask the people he murdered this week…..

By: Kay Simpson

Kay Simpson — Mon, 07 May 2012 10:30:52 +0000

Well, why is this happening now? JT Ready in Gilbert Arizona. Ask that baby and her other 3 family members that are all dead if they think he’s a right wing extremist terrorist. I don’t think there would be an argument about it….

By: Bumpkin

Bumpkin — Wed, 02 May 2012 07:35:44 +0000

I totally agree with you! A President that has never served his country is a ridiculous idea- how can one be a Commander-in-Chief if he’s never ‘commanded’ more than a toy soldier army in the dirt outside his Mamma’s house? Ridiculous thought. We totally DO need a (?wo/)man of honor to serve, as General George Washington did. Only problem is, that men and women of honor have no lust to control a nation or a world, and they are reluctant to step up to the position. Furthermore, the mostly weird groups of people that make those huge campaign donations so they can essentially buy their guy a place on the WH “throne” in order to further their own agendas will not step up and donate mightily to someone that will not further their warped cause, So your dream-candidate (and mine) will not likely show up to fight the battle for the Presidency, unless we rout the man or woman out, beg, cajole and plead with him/her to step up to the plate, then we give up a year or two of our lives to campaign incessantly for this person to garner donations to keep them in the race. No, it would be a HUGE job.

By: Bumpkin

Bumpkin — Wed, 02 May 2012 07:22:47 +0000

Stephen Rickett: You’ve got that right! I would TOTALLY trust a returned serviceman/woman behind me with a firearm than I would a politician standing behind me with the same. @ Ian MacRanald, You, too, hit the nail on the head. They are afraid of our military people, because nearly all our Military folk have honor, and Barry Slick, the Con-man, and his gang have not a drop. Honor is a power, and one which they cannot comprehend, except that it is far stronger and much more valuable than their own sick type of power, which relies on lying, cheat and deceit. So, this administration’s coming out with these statements is merely to try to remove some of our service folk’s power with ‘We the People’ (us) Unfortunately, there actually ARE still too many people in America that believe if they hear something on TV, it is gospel-truth, and that our government is somehow chock-full of men and women of massive integrity, instead of the dens of liars, scammers and thieves it has largely become. Those ignoramuses are the ones that will believe anything a person in an authoritative position tells them is the truth, whether or not it is a bald-faced lie. They are planting the seeds of mistrust, so that it will be easier for them later to pimp the public into turning in our Military folk if they disagree with the government. They have already done away with the Writ of Habeus Corpus, and likely many more laws, in order to facilitate their communist takeover. One election will not change the stench in the pigpen overmuch, either. It will take a while to eradicate these rotting snakes.

By: will US troops fire on American Citizens - Page 4

will US troops fire on American Citizens - Page 4 — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:52:30 +0000

[...] [...]