Comments on: Healthcare Reform Bill to Include Taxpayer Funded Abortion

By: Ashley

Ashley — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:28:29 +0000

Kimber -

I could not have said it any better.

That pretty much sums up the dire straits of our “free” nation.

By: Ashley

Ashley — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:25:17 +0000

Population control at its best. Very scary indeed.

I don’t understand the bleeding heart liberals who claim they feel sorry for the underprivileged – they want to give up the health care coverage they have to “help” those who have no insurance? Makes no sense to me when the statistics say most of those uninsured can afford it, they just choose not to insure themselves.

By: krjipi

krjipi — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:24:00 +0000

I don’t like the idea of my tax dollars going to support or benefit any religious organizations. I believe in the separation of Church and State. Sadly though my tax dollars do support such organizations, through grants to fund their programs. My tax dollars also pay for police and fire protection as well as sewage, streets and sidewalks that religious organization take full advantage of.

However not paying taxes because I dislike where a little bit of it goes is not an option. Would be like cutting off one’s nose to spite their own face.

Not everyone follows or ascribes to the same belief system and none should try to force theirs upon another. Those that are overly concerned with the business of others are usually the same ones not attending to their own.

Don’t you just love the smell of hypocrisy first thing in the morning? Folks should busy themselves with living their own lives according to their own faith and let others be.

By: monique

monique — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:51:20 +0000

I am not at all FOR taxpayers paying for abortions, but the suggestion that this bill will initiate a system in which abortions will be paid for (resulting in an increase in the number of abortions performed) is inaccurate. Abortions are ALREADY paid for by taxpayers through each state’s Medicaid programs. Really. What WILL be initiated by this horrendous bill is a Federal pool of money, rather than just the state pools we already have in place.

By: Dominique

Dominique — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:50:30 +0000

Kimber, I did a post on my blog about this. You can read it here.

http://anunlikelyperspective2.squarespace.com/aup2/2009/7/22/end-of-life-counseling-required-4-senior-citizens.html

By: Kimber

Kimber — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:58:08 +0000

What about the part in the health care bill that senior citizens will require “end of life counseling” and advise on how to end life sooner. Now we are moving towards Euthanasia ..

By: Curtis Zachman

Curtis Zachman — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:52:43 +0000

The libs will do anything to get abortion funded by the taxpayer! Sneak it into any bill they can! They call themselves compassionate, Bull! They bitch about the men who die in Iraq, then turn around and allow abortion! They save animals, then allow unborn babies to be murdered! They tell us even terrorists have rights, but say the unborn have none! They have as much compassion as the Nazis did! Liberal hypocrit!

By: Dominique

Dominique — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:24:59 +0000

I heard a guest on Fox today saying that one of Obama’s Czar’s thinks it is okay to abort a child…are you ready for this…up to 2 years after birth! No joke! Is that sick or what! God have mercy on our country! Geesh…sometimes I just want to cry!

By: Mr Pink Eyes

Mr Pink Eyes — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:41:47 +0000

This is outrageous but considering that Obama didn’t vote to save living babies who survived abortions it isn’t surprising that he would support letting seniors die.

By: Dominique

Dominique — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:31:26 +0000

I just heard on Fox today that within the health bill is a provision that those over 65 will be required to receive counseling every 5 years to determine the necessity for end of life! No Joke!

Here is what Rush said about this recently!

“Ladies and gentlemen, we have found something else in the health care bill. Page 425 to page 430. The House version of the health care bill is going to require mandatory counseling for all seniors at a minimum of every five years, more often if the senior is sick or in a nursing home. Just how many government trained counselors will that put into the workforce? With an over-65 population of 38 million according to the US Census 2007, if you have an over-65 population of 38 million people you’re going to need four counseling sessions daily, that’s 37,000 at a minimum counselors plus their supervisors, then the people who read their reports, and the oversight agency. You know what we ought to do? We ought to put together a single page cut-and-paste fact sheet at RushLimbaugh.com that people could cut and paste and fax to the White House so that Obama will know what is in the bill.

I’ll bet he doesn’t know that there is end-of-life counseling for senior citizens on page 425 to 430. What is this counseling going to be? Why would you need mandatory counseling for all seniors, and who’s going to pay for this? Mandatory counseling for all seniors at a minimum of every five years, more often if the seasoned citizen is sick or in a nursing home. And as Don Parker writes here at the American Thinker, “Don’t even think that anyone should receive mandatory counseling regarding the end-of-life issues surrounding abortion.” That’s an invasion of the right to privacy. We can’t have counseling for mothers who are thinking of terminating their pregnancy, but we can go in there and counsel people about to die. I’m sure you could get some counselors from the Hemlock Society to go in and do this. Kevorkian might want to come back to life and handle this. End-of-life counselors, end-of-life treatment for senior citizens, mandatory.”

For entire transcript – http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_072109/content/01125114.guest.html