Michele Bachmann claims Keith Ellison may have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood
Michele Bachmann came under fire last week by members of both parties for stating her belief that the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the top levels of the United States government–up to and including Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin. Former presidential candidate and current RINO John McCain was among those who said that Michele Bachmann’s claim was baseless, as was the weepy eyed Speaker of the House John Boehner, but according to this story there may be reason for concern:
in order to dismiss Bachmann’s concerns that easily, we have to ignore three huge problems:
1. Abedin’s mother is not only a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, but also sits on the Guidance Board of that organization. Making her not only a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s female auxiliary, but also a prestigious member.
2. Another member of the Muslim Sisterhood’s Guidance Bureau is Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi’s wife, which means Abedin’s mother and the wife of an renowned Muslim Brotherhood member are in regular and frequent contact.
3. Lastly, Abedin’s brother, Hassan Abedin, has allegedly collaborated with Omar Naseef and Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, two of the most influential terror supporters in the world
Maybe Michele Bachmann knows of which she speaks after all, and maybe our elected officials are just too cowardly to admit the truth, or too enslaved to political correctness to address this issue.
Michele Bachmann is not backing down in the face of withering criticism from both parties and in fact she has doubled down by adding the name of the first Muslim ever elected to the United States House of Representatives, Keith Ellison, to the list of people who have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood:
Well, he has a long record of being associated with (the Council on
American-Islamic Relations) and with the Muslim Brotherhood
Are these claims baseless? It doesn’t even matter because if there is one thing that Barack Obama has taught us during his reelection campaign it is this: Any accusations can be thrown out at a candidate regardless of whether or not there is proof–you can call your opponent a felon and a criminal–and it is up to that person to prove that he or she is innocent of the charges. If the person does not he is assumed guilty.
You are guilty until proven innocent, that is how the Obama campaign has treated Romney, so using that precedent I think now that the accusations have been thrown out there it is up to both Huma Abedin and Keith Ellison to prove their innocence and it doesn’t even matter if the claims are baseless. Perhaps releasing all of their tax returns would help to prove they haven’t donated to the Muslim Brotherhood, if they refuse to do so we can assume they have because that is what Barack Obama has taught us.
Oh, and by the way, wasn’t Valerie Jarrett born in Iran?