Skip to content
About these ads

Director of National Intelligence edited the Benghazi talking points

November 20, 2012

 While testifying under oath last week David Petraeus stated that he knew the attack on the United States consulate in Benghazi was a terrorist attack almost immediately. He also stated that the original talking points memo the CIA  drew up about the attack contained references to the attack being related to al Qaeda but that someone edited the memo prior to the White House sending out Susan Rice to advance the cover up.

  The White House has denied any role in the cover up and now according to this story we are learning that it was someone in the DNI who changed the talking points memo.

  We are now being told the reason for the change is because the al Qaeda connection was still “tenuous” five days later even though David Petraeus, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton knew the truth almost immediately. We know the real reason why the terrorist link was omitted so shortly before the election, and it had nothing to do with the link being tenuous, but now that we know who edited the memo it is time to move on to the more important questions surrounding the terrorist attack in Benghazi because the cover up–while bad enough–isn’t the most important question here.

    Now it is time we learned the answers to the most important questions: Why did the Obama regime ignore Chris Stevens’ pleas for more security? Why did the Obama regime remove security teams before the attack in spite of Chris Stevens’ pleas? Why did the Obama regime ignore the warnings that an attack was imminent? Why did Barack Obama skip intelligence meetings in the week leading up to September 11th when everyone knows this is a date terrorist would love to target for another attack? Why did Barack Obama not send in help after the attack started when it was in the area? Why did Barack Obama lie during the debate and claim he linked the attack to terrorism on September 12th if he really thought the link was too tenuous? How is it that the Obama regime already had the You Tube video excuse cued up and ready to go and is it because they were warned an attack was coming and did nothing to prevent it? Was the CIA annex in Benghazi really an illegal CIA black prison site? Was the Obama regime smuggling weapons recovered in Libya through Turkey and into Syria? And lastly, does Barack Obama still feel the deaths of four Americans was just “a bump in the road?” 

  The cover up is a big issue, don’t get me wrong, but it is not the biggest issue when it comes to the Benghazi attack. The big issue is what the Obama regime is trying to cover up, and that is what we need to know.

  I don’t blame the Congress for focusing on the cover up to start the investigation for it is a very good starting point but that is all it should be. The real questions haven’t even been asked yet.

About these ads
12 Comments leave one →
  1. November 20, 2012 11:33 pm

    The more time which passes – as the truth comes out – the more and more it is apparent that there were lies, cover-ups, and Mitt Romney was right. Looks like Clapper is going to take the wrapper for this. At least that’s who the Obama administration is going to try and make be the fall guy.

    Like

    • November 21, 2012 7:04 am

      Right now it looks like Clapper will be the fall guy for the gover up, but we still need to know what it is they were really trying to cover up.

      Like

  2. bunkerville permalink
    November 21, 2012 6:46 am

    This is the same fellow who they left out of the loop over the British terrorists when he was on the talkie with Janet. Made him look like a …… Looks like he is odd man out.

    Like

    • November 21, 2012 7:05 am

      I don’t see him hanging on for too long at this point, but I hope the Congress doesn’t let this go after this. We still need to know the answers to many questions.

      Like

  3. November 21, 2012 9:15 am

    What fall guy? Geez, you guys won’t be happy until there’s an assault on an American installation somewhere and the government publishes all the details, including the names and identities of the assets in place that provided the intelligence, just to make it easier for our to locate and kill them. Perhaps you’d like hourly, realtime updates on our progress in identifying and confronting those responsible, because we know terrorists don’t monitor the news.

    At any rate, the conspiracy-theorist-in-chief seems to be backing off his absurd claims of a coverup: http://bit.ly/QWBE8O.

    Take good care and may God bless us all!

    TGY

    Like

    • Georgia Peach permalink
      November 21, 2012 11:48 am

      If information is given to the public then all we want is the truth, not a fabricated explanation. I don’t think that is too much to ask.

      Like

      • November 21, 2012 12:55 pm

        No Georgia Peach, it isn’t too much to ask. But it is too much to ask from the Democratic Party, including Dear Leader himself. They will do their level best to wiggle out of this investigation like worms in hot ashes. Even now, they are breaking out their favorite tool: Slander. According to them, anyone who questions what occured in Benghazi is “targeting women and minorities”.

        The truth is, they are continuing Obama’s cover up, because they are determined to protect him from the obvious truth. And they betray their role as representatives of the people when they do so. Thus we see, that their allegiance is to Obama, not the people they were elected to represent.

        From the beginning Obama was determined to cover up Benghazi so he could win the election. On November 1st, while campaigning, he declared to thousands in Wisconsin and millions more on television, that “Al Qaeda was decimated”. The truth is, two days before he spun this lie, as recently as October 29th, a major terror plot targeting civilians and multiple US embassasies in Indonesia was thwarted by Indonesian authorities.

        Meanwhile, the week before that, on October 21, the same thing occured in Jordan, where the loss of life would been tantamount to our 911 and also included multiple US embassies in Jordan. Jordanian authorities thwarted the attack. As the news was breaking about this Al Qaeda attack, Democratic Senator Dick Durbin was on a Sunday talk show defending Obama over the Benghazi cover up, and Durbin was saying “Al Qaeda is on their heels”. And Obama appeared in a Presidential debate the day after this occured, on October 22, and declared the same thing to millions watching the debate.

        Obama continued to lie about the rise of Al Qaeda activities all the way up to the day of the election, when he spewed the same lie to citizens in Ohio.

        It becomes more and more apparent that the current administration preys upon the ignorant en masse, and has gone to a great deal of trouble to conceal the fact that Benghazi was an Al Qaeda linked terror attack so that Obama could claim victory over Al Qaeda on the campaign stump and win the election – by misleading millions of foolish and ignorant Americans into a false sense of security.

        We know this is but one reason for the cover up, and as the investigation continues, I suspect we will discover reasons that are far worse.

        Like

      • November 21, 2012 7:23 pm

        Neither do I!

        Like

      • November 21, 2012 7:25 pm

        I hope we get to the bottom of this Southpaw but Fast and Furious has taught me that it is highly unlikely.

        Like

    • November 21, 2012 7:22 pm

      The fall guy for the cover up, Rice was sent out there to promote a story that everyone knew was false and it was done for political reasons. We just want the truth, that is all. We don’t want people going out there and lying to our faces.
      As far as McCain goes, he was attacked for taking a tough stand, he was called a racist and anti-woman and he backed down.

      Like

  4. November 21, 2012 5:40 pm

    I’ve tagged you with the Blog-A-Thon Award. The details are at http://theraineyview.wordpress.com/2012/11/21/blog-a-thon-award-time-im-it/.

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. Benghazi: The changing talking points | America's Watchtower

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,398 other followers

%d bloggers like this: