Skip to content

Obama’s Team Claims Rahm Emanuel Only Had One Conversation With Blagojevich

December 21, 2008

President-elect Obama had an internal investigation on his staff and on Rahm Emanuel in particular to find out if there was any wrong doing within his staff in the pay to play scheme that Democrat governor Rod Blagojevich was conducting to fill Obama’s vacant senate seat.

 Guess what he found? He found that Rahm Emanuel only had one conversation with the disgraced governor of Illinois and it didn’t involve talk about Obama’s senate vacancy. Who woulda thunk it? And we know that this must be true because it is being reported here by the non-partisan George Stephanopoulos. (I can’t even type that with a straight face)

 Evidently Obama’s internal investigation missed this story about Rahm Emanuel being caught on tape 21 times talking with Blagojevich. That isn’t surprising because his internal investigation also missed this story about Rahm Emanuel having direct talks with the governor about Obama’s senate seat. 

 President-elect Obama is in spin mode. He assured us that nobody on his staff had ANY conversations with Blago and that was a lie, now he is saying that yes Rahm did talk to Blago but only once and not about his senate seat. All the while Emanuel is on tape talking to Blago about the seat. But much like all of Obama”s other controversial associations that some of us knew about despite the medias attempt to hide it, the media will also hide this.

 Does anyone else out there find it odd that Patrick Fitzgerald stopped Blagojevich before the deal actually went down? Usually when there is a sting operation nobody moves in until the deal is complete, yet this was stopped before it ever happened. Why?

  We are talking about the man who continued the Plame leak investigation for a year after he know who leaked Plame’s name just so that he could get a process crime, yet he stopped this before the actual crime was committed. 

 This was going to go all the way to Obama if it was allowed to proceed so it was stopped. That is the only conclusion I can come to.

 Now Obama is admitting that a member of his staff DID in fact contact Blago but he is spinning it so that it sounds like just a routine conversation took place regardless of the evidence to the contrary. And we will never know the true extent of Obama’s involvement because Fitzgerald conveniently stopped the pay to play scheme before it ever reached it’s conclusion.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

6 Comments leave one →
  1. TexasCowboy's avatar
    December 22, 2008 10:11 am

    Obama definitely mishandled the issue. I seriously doubt it will have much negative impact on him personally, but as an Obama supporter, I am slightly concerned we may be witnessing more politics as usual, which is contrary to his 2 years of campaigning on honesty and integrity. Time will tell.

    Like

  2. andeeroo's avatar
    andeeroo permalink
    December 23, 2008 12:22 am

    Could Rahm have asked him WHY THE HECK HIS HAIR NEVER MOVES????

    What if Blago’s innocent BUT HIS HAIR IS CRIMINAL!

    The “hair-raising” truth about the pay for play scandal and the
    governor of Illinois.

    http://andeeroo.wordpress.com/

    Like

  3. Cpl. Booth's avatar
    Cpl. Booth permalink
    December 23, 2008 5:42 pm

    Okay, so now the “Internal” investigation by the Obamma team say the aid had “Multiple” conversations” with Blago. Hmm, wonder where this is going?
    I expect that Barry will sacrifice poor Rahmie before he lets this touch him. And the libs will blindly accept whatever crap that their anoited one feeds them.
    Oh, crap! There I go again being divisive.
    Don’t you just love the new liberal buzz word, “Divisive”?
    Seems to me that they have been nothing but divisive for the past eight years. But oh no, that was just exercising their right to dissent.
    Hang on to your ass Gents, the ride is about to get rough. And no, I meant no queer innuendo. But that too.

    Like

  4. Cpl. Booth's avatar
    Cpl. Booth permalink
    December 23, 2008 5:43 pm

    Please forgive the poor spelling and the rant. Been hitting the good Scotch a bit early.

    Like

  5. Steve Dennis's avatar
    December 23, 2008 7:13 pm

    Cpl. Booth, when conseravtives oppose the president it is divisive but when liberals did the same over the last eight years they called it patriotic. Isn’t it funny how the standards aren’t the same for liberals and conservatives?

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. Internal Review Shows Emanuel Did Have Multiple Conversations With Blagojevich « America’s Watchtower

Leave a comment