President Obama’s Science Czar is a Radical Who Must be Removed

   It is a disgrace who President Obama named as his “Science Czar” and it is even more of a disgrace that either the  information which follows in this post was not provided to the senate for his confirmation hearing or it was submitted and ignored by the senate.

  I thought that it was bad enough when we recently learned that Obama “Science Czar,” John Holdren, was a proponent of forced abortion and sterilization, (so much for a woman’s right to choose), but we are learning even more facts about Holdren that are equally radical and insidious.

   We now know that John Holdren believes that a BORN Baby will eventually become a human being. He doesn’t believe that a baby is a human being until certain conditions are met.

The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being,

  We can argue all day long about when a life becomes a life and whether a fetus is actually a human being but this man has taken the debate far past that argument. He has proclaimed that only after a BORN BABY is properly fed and “socialized” will the baby then evolve into a human being. Does this man have no respect for life whatsoever?

  The question has to be asked, what does he consider properly socialized? What if the parents are teaching the young child beliefs that are at odds with his teachings, would he consider this child to be not properly socialized? And if a baby is not a human being until it is properly socialized does this leave open the option of a “post birth abortion” in the eyes of this man?

  These are all legitimate questions that should have been asked before he was confirmed to Obama’s cabinet and I do not think that they are out of place when you consider that President Obama did not have a problem letting BORN BABIES who survived abortion attempts die without any medical care or attention.

  This is not the end of the story when it comes to Holdren’s radicalism however as we have also learned, (on a different subject), that John Holdren also advocated the “de-development” of the United States. Apparently America has become too advanced and needs to be scaled back.

A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States

  And he also brings a little of President Obama’s “redistribute the wealth” philosophy into the picture:

The need for de-development presents our economists with a major challenge. They must design a stable, low-consumption economy in which there is a much more equitable distribution of wealth than in the present one. Redistribution of wealth both within and among nations is absolutely essential, if a decent life is to be provided to every human being

  A low consumption economy? He wants to bring America back to the stone age. This is the person that Barack Obama appointed to head the “White House Office of Science and Technology Policy?” This is the person who was confirmed by a senate committee? This is disgraceful on all levels. It is disgraceful that the president nominated him, it is disgraceful that the senate confirmed him, and it is disgraceful that the American people voted for a president that holds these kinds of beliefs.

  John Holdren is a radical, there can no longer be debate on this issue. The “science czar” is settled, (to borrow a term from Al Gore.)

   Barack Obama has been around radicals all of his life and he is still hanging around radicals today. Do you remember the “bubble” that George Bush was said to be in? Well Barack Obama is in a “bubble’ of his own and he has been in this bubble all of  his life. His is a bubble of radical anti-Americanism and he remains in it today.

  It is not surprising that Obama would nominate a man with these beliefs, it is what he has grown up around, it is all that Obama knows. But what is surprising is that John Holdren made it through the confirmation hearings without nary a word of this being spoken. I want to know who is responsible. Was this information hidden from the committee or did the committee know about Holdren’s past and ignore it?

  It is too late now, one has to wonder how much policy a radical like John Holdren will craft in the Obama administration, but any policy he does craft will be too much.

  It is a shame that such a radical man was allowed to gain such a position in any president’s cabinet. John Holdren should resign or be removed. There is no place for a such a radical person to be involved in policy decisions of any kind no matter how large or small those decisions are.