Skip to content

The healthcare reform debate; politics at its worst

December 21, 2009

  While reading one of my favorite blogs, Political Realities, I came across a post entitled “Senator Ben Nelson will vote yes.” I left a comment on the article, to which one of the authors of the blog, Mike, wrote a reply that got me thinking.

  He said:

I’d add that the backroom negotiations have made it perfectly clear to Senate Democrats that it is not in their best interest to support any Obama initiative right out of the gate. Why should they when the Republicans appear united in opposition to any Obama proposal thereby making every one of the 60 Senate Dem votes required and therefore negotiable. Why say “yes, I’m in favor of that” when you can say instead “yes, I’m in favor of that provided I get x, y, and z” for my state? And are House Dems now supposed to blindly vote yes as they watch hardline Senate Dems gain individual benefits for their states as a “reward” for their incalcitrance? It’s truly politics at its absolute worst.

  This is an angle that I hadn’t even thought about. While I find it extremely exciting that the Republicans have seemingly become unified against this president’s agenda, there is actually a downside to it.

  Because the Republicans can be counted on to vote against almost anything that the president introduces, it renders the Democrats’ individual votes in the senate even more powerful. As Mike asks,”Why say ‘yes, I’m in favor of that’ when you can say instead ‘yes, I’m in favor of that provided I get x, y, and z’ for my state?”

   Also, as Mike states, it make all of the senate Democrats’ votes negotiable. They hold a position of power and can use that power to gain more “concessions” for their states at the expense of the other states. We have seen this on display with Mary Ladrieu, Ben Nelson, Chris Dodd, and Harry Reid. Instead of voting for or against a bill on the merits of the bill, their vote is now for sale.

  It is sort of ironic that the unity in the Republican party– unity that was missing for far too long– could actually do more harm than good; not because of their unity and not because they are on the wrong side of the issues, but because it gives certain Democrats bargaining power that they would not otherwise have. With every single Democrat vote needed to pass any bill on the president’s agenda, it makes their vote worth more– figuratively and literally. Democrats have the votes to pass whatever they want to, but some Democrats are using the unity of the Republican party as a bargaining chip against their own party to drive up the cost of legislation in order to help their re-election bids.

  There is no reason that any Democrat should not hold out to gain “concessions” through what Harry Reid thinks of as “negotiating,” to not hold out would be irresponsible. Why not get whatever you can while you can? We cannot blame these senators for going after everything they can get, if my Democrat senator was as shrewd as any of those listed above, instead of being the rubber stamp that she is, perhaps New Hampshire could have won a deal much like some of the other states. I am not condoning this type of thug politics, but what good reason does she have for not trying to lessen the burden of her taxpaying constituents while so many of her colleagues are doing the same?

  As Mike said in his comment, this is politics at its absolute worst. Instead of voting on the merits of a bill and putting the country first , these politicians are using their political capital to “bring home the bacon,” but all that it is doing is raising the price tag of healthcare reform and putting a larger burden on fewer tax paying Americans.

  What this tells me is that we need to elect more Republicans to the senate in 2010 in order to offset this pork barrel money grab, and diminish the selfish power that is being wielded by certain senators in Washington at the expense of others. Even one more Republican senator would weaken the bargaining power of these senators who are looking through a prism of  “what are you going to do for me” instead of looking at what is best for the country.

   Of course, this would also serve to give the “usual suspects” in the Republican party; John McCain, Olympia Snowe, and Susan Collins to name three, more power to try to cut a deal with the Democrats so there is only one thing left for us to do.

  It is time to take the power away from those in Washington and put it back where it belongs, in the hands of the people. We have the final say next year, we need to make it count.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

7 Comments leave one →
  1. LD Jackson's avatar
    LD Jackson permalink
    December 21, 2009 10:59 pm

    Great article, Mr. Pink Eyes. Thanks for linking back to my article and to the blog.

    I really hope we can change the political landscape in 2010, before it is too late to do so. If we can gain enough seats in Congress to give us more influence and if the Republican Party will hold true to it’s standards and refuse to cave in, once they gain that influence, than maybe we can get something accomplished.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      December 22, 2009 10:31 pm

      Thank you Larry.
      I do think that Republicans have learned a lesson and I do think that they will hold true from here on out. I also believe that Republicans are going to win back some seats, will it be enough to stop Obama, who knows? But we have to start somewhere.

      Like

  2. Matt's avatar
    December 21, 2009 11:25 pm

    Mike is a rarity. He is not from our side of the political spectrum, but you can debate him in a civil manner. This is a good point for him to raise. I too had not thought of that, but it is an important aspect of the political game to examine. Thanks for posting this. It will likely come in handy when we are trying to interpret what the folks in DC are doing.

    Like

    • LD Jackson's avatar
      LD Jackson permalink
      December 22, 2009 6:46 am

      Yes, Mike is a rarity. That is why I gave him posting privileges on Political Realities and I have not regretted doing so.

      Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        December 22, 2009 10:37 pm

        Even though I rarely agree with Mike, I enjoy reading his posts. I find them well thought out, researched, and interesting.

        Like

  3. Ron Russell's avatar
    December 22, 2009 3:48 pm

    There is another side to this coin, the Republicans by standing together and forcing the Democrats to make these very public deals to reel in the moderates in their own party are show casing the corruption particularly in the Senate. This is good for the Republicans. Bringing home the bacon is fine so long as one does NOT have to give up convictions and go against the majority of voters in ones state. The Republicans have done us a favor by standing firm and exposing these deals—-most Americans are getting their first eyefull of political corrupt at its best.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      December 22, 2009 10:39 pm

      Very true Ron, watching the deals that the Democrats have to swing in order to pass their agenda cannot have a good effect on them. People will see exactly how low they sill stoop and it could end up backfiring on them.

      Like

Leave a comment