Radical environmentalist takes hostages at the Discovery Channel’s headquarters

  The propaganda arm of the Obama regime has gone out of their way to paint all of the Tea Party activists as violent racists who could snap at any moment–Homeland Security has gone so  far as to issue a report warning of dangerous radical right wing extremists.

  But so far the Tea Party activists have proven to be nothing more than peaceful protesters who long for the day when we can reign in the out of control federal government–through the peaceful process called elections– and return the power back to the people. Yet this has not stopped the leftists–with help from their friends and brothers in arms, the media–from continuing the mantra about the potential dangers of the Tea Party activists–who are still trying to claim that we are no better than the Ku Klux Klan.

  While we have remained a peaceful people, the desperate left who feels their power slipping away has grown more and more vitriolic and dangerous and earlier today we learned that one such leftist–John Cusack–has gone on record as hoping for a “satanic death” to overcome Fox News and Republican leaders such as Newt Gingrich and Dick Armey. This sounds almost like a call to arms if you ask me, so much for the all encompassing and tolerant left.

  But that isn’t the biggest news coming from the radical left today–not by a longshot.

 Because today a radical environmentalist stormed into the Discovery Channel building and took hostages in a lame attempt to move the global warming agenda forward before being gunned down by police. Maybe, just maybe, John Cusack’s statement is what pushed him over the edge.

  Thankfully nobody else was hurt in this attack, but this goes to show us that it is the radical left–not the right–that has the true proclivity towards violence if their agenda is not realized in what they consider a timely manner.

  For all of the hoopla surrounding the Tea Party it is interesting to learn that it is the far left that is actually the group of people that one needs to be concerned about. It is the radical left that has a tendency to become violent, and now that tendency is more than just a concern because today it turned into a reality.

  For all of those out there who would claim that I am being unfair by lumping all environmentalists and leftists in with an obvious lunatic who was acting alone, I have just one word for you–exactly! Now you know how it feels to be unfairly categorized just because you differ on the issues.

  It is unfair to lump all leftists in with James Lee and I did it simply to make a point. The point being that it is unfair to label a whole group of people based on preconceived bigotry toward that group. But this is precisely what the left and the media have done in regards to the Tea Party movement. Leftists such as Janeane Garofalo basically called all Tea Party members racists who just hate the fact that a black man is in the White house.

  The list of examples of this anti-Tea Party bigotry is long and has been well chronicled since the Tea Party’s inception all across the blogosphere, there is no need to list all of the examples here. Anyone that is honest with themselves will admit that the Tea Party members have all been labeled as dangerous racists who represent a real chance of inciting violence directed at the White House.

    It is wrong to tie in all leftists with James Lee, but it is also just as it is wrong to tie all Tea Party members in with people who might be racists with violent tendencies.

   Sure there may be people who have joined the Tea Party that harbor violent racists beliefs, but they are the fringe minority and it is wrong to label all of us as racists based on the actions–if any violent actions are taken, so far there have been none–of a select few people who just happened to join the Tea Party. If some violent act occurs from a member of the Tea Party it will not be representative of the Tea Party as a whole.

  As environmentalists rightfully begin to distance themselves from the actions of James Lee perhaps they will begin  to question whether or not they should be labeling all of those that disagree with them on the issues as racists because it is unfair, just as it is unfair to lump all environmentalists in with James Lee.

  Perhaps this can be used as a teachable moment for the left and they will realize how wrong their portrayal of their political adversaries has been.