Two recent court decisions on gay rights have put Barack Obama in a tight spot
Recently a couple of issues have arisen that have put Barack Obama in a tight spot. These two issues are both court decisions involving gay rights; the first is a Massachusetts court decision that ruled the “Defense of Marriage Act” unconstitutional and the second, and even more recent, a California court decision that ruled the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy unconstitutional, and has ordered the military to stop enforcing it.
Earlier this year a Massachusetts judge ruled that DOMA was unconstitutional based on the 10th amendment, ruling that states have the right to decide the issue of whether or not gay marriage should be legal in the individual states. I happen to agree with this decision, as I wrote in this post and my “About Me” page because I believe in states rights and believe gay marriage is a states rights issue.
Barack Obama’s position on this issue is a little less clear; during the campaign he claimed that he believed marriage was defined as being a union between one man and one woman, while also claiming that he did not agree with DOMA. His regime has challenged the Massachusetts ruling because he claims that while he opposes DOMA he feels he must defend it as federal law.
As a policy matter, the President has made clear that he believes DOMA is discriminatory and should be repealed,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler. “The Justice Department is defending the statute, as it traditionally does when acts of Congress are challenged
This is where his position on the issue of gay marriage gets a little cloudy to me. During the campaign–as I stated above–he claimed that he believed a marriage was between one man and one woman, yet he claims he also believes that DOMA is discriminatory policy, wouldn’t that mean that his campaign position is also discriminatory?
This contradiction has not gone unnoticed within the gay community and with gay rights activists who are already dismayed by what they perceive as the slow pace with which Barack Obama has addressed the issues related to the gay community.
This may have put Barack Obama on even shakier ground with the gay community than he already was, but the news of the California court decision on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” has thrust the spotlight directly on Barack Obama with regards to gay issues. Will Barack Obama appeal this decision as well?
While Barack Obama and his regime as of yet have not taken an official position on this ruling, if Robert Gibbs’s comments can be used as a barometer of the president’s position–and as his press secretary I think it is safe to say he echoes the president’s position, if he doesn’t he shouldn’t be in that position–it sounds as if Barack Obama’s Department of Justice may be readying an appeal of this decision as well.
“I feel strongly this is an action that needs to be taken by the Congress and that it is an action that requires careful preparation, and a lot of training,” said Gates. “It has enormous consequences for our troops.”
Robert Gibbs has stated that the issue of gays in the military is an issue that should not be decided by the courts but rather by the Congress and we can only assume that Barack Obama feels the same way–as do I. The problem is that the Congress has been unable to pass a repeal of the military’s policy, that does not mean one judge can unilaterally change the policy by herself. Not even the president is powerful enough to do something like that.
Barack Obama has said that he will end the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t tell” policy, but he is willing to wait until the military concludes its report and the Congress votes on it, yet this one judge has decided that the policy should be rescinded without taking into account the possible repercussions.
If Barack Obama does indeed decide to challenge this ruling based on the way the policy was rescinded–even though he agrees with the premise behind this decision–this will only further alienate him with the gay community.
These two issues combined have backed Barack Obama into a corner. He is faced with the dilemma of trying to placate moderate America by not appearing to be too far to the left but at the same time he is facing increased pressure from his far left base who feel that he has not done enough, not only on gay issues but on all issues from healthcare reform to cap and trade. Barack Obama is in the midst of a mid-term election juggling act and there appears to be no easy way out for him.

You are indeed correct, Steve. The President is in a corner and I really don’t know how he is going to get out of this one. No matter which way he turns, someone is going to be very upset with him. Honestly, I would give anything to be a fly on the wall of the Oval Office and hear what he is saying about this privately.
LikeLike
His only hope to get out of this is to delay his decision on DADT until after the election but I don’t think that will work either because the gay community already think he has delayed too long. He is just going to have to hope for the best.
LikeLike
Very true, Steve. The man is in a pickle and I say that with no pleasure. The rock and the hard place applies wonderfully.
LikeLike
Steve, below is my comment I posted over at political realities.
We CANNOT have renegade activist judges deciding what is best for our military. This whole mess created by this judge has less to do with DADT and more to with the President and his role as CIC. If this is allowed to stand where does it stop on other issues pertaining to the military? What if some judge rules that people overweight in the military have a right to serve even though they don’t meet the established standard. However some judge decides these folks are being discriminated against because of the policy or standard. All it would do is effect the moral and good order of the military in time of war and impact mission effectiveness. I’m not against taking a fresh look at DADT, I’m against these activist judge substituting their rulings for decisions that should be made by the Congress, President, and military commanders. These judges need to stay in their lanes…period!
LikeLike
You have rased some questions that I hadn’t even thought of. Where does this end if it is allowed to stand? This would set the precedent that would allow the courts to step in and decide military policy, it is a dangerous place for the court to be stepping.
The military is a VOLUNTARY unit and as such people understand what they are volunteering for, they know the rules and they accept them, the courts have no place here at all!
LikeLike
Ideally, nobody would ever have the courts intrude on their turf. But if you don’t want that, you have to keep your own house in order.
LikeLike
It’s not a renegade Judge. It’s a highly intellectual thinker who has studied the law and rights of ALL people as documented in the US Constitution. It’s really quite black and white here. And speaking of black & white, I’d still be sitting in the back of the damn bus if we were “waiting” for Congress to receive “complete reports” from The Defense Department on the societal impact of ending racial segregation. We’re all adults here. Just end DADT and make it clear that the policy has ended. PERIOD. It would take 5 minutes.
Even Israel, arguably the holiest, most sacred land on earth allows gay citizens to serve openly as soldiers in their military-one of the toughest military bodies in the world mind you.
So please tell me exactly what the hell is America’s problem with this? Religion won’t suffice as an answer as we are SUPPOSED to have a separation from church and state when we pass federal laws. It’s clearly fear and personal bias against gays that is fueling this discrimination and it sets us back to the stone ages (though even then I suspect there were openly gay cavemen welcomed in defending their caves with the others).
LikeLike
Maybe I’m off base here, but if “DOMA was unconstitutional based on the 10th amendment, ruling that states have the right to decide the issue of whether or not gay marriage should be legal in the individual states. ” then why does our federal government feel they have the right to force Obamacare down our throats? Wouldn’t that also fall under the 10th Amendment and become a state issue?
LikeLike
I do think that healthcare should be a states rights issue as well.While I disagree with Massachusetts healthcare law I think they have the right to implement it, however I do not think the feds have any right to mandate to Americans that they have to buy insurance!
LikeLike