Skip to content

Healthcare group claims massive job loss due to Obamacare

February 18, 2014

 Kathleen Sebelius recently said there was no evidence that Obamacare was costing people in the healthcare industry to lose their jobs, going so far as to claim reports to the contrary were nothing but a myth:

“There is absolutely no evidence, and every economist will tell you this, that there is any job loss related to the Affordable Care Act,” Sebelius said Monday in Orlando. “Part-time physicians are actually down since 2010, not up. The number of full-time workers continues to increase. I know that’s a popular myth that continues to be repeated but it just is not accurate.”

  However, a report released by AdvaMed contradicts Kathleen Sebelius’s statement:

A new report from a top health care industry trade organization contradicts Kathleen Sebelius’ recent claim that no job loss will occur under Obamacare.

Obamacare’s medical device tax has already created a job loss of 33,000 in the medical device industry and 132,0o0 more job losses are expected, according to a new report from the industry trade group the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), obtained by the Daily Caller.

  Here are some of the examples  AdvaMec uses in their report:

“The tax has resulted in employment reductions of approximately 14,000 industry workers and forgone hiring of 19,000 workers. The total job impact of the tax on industry employment was approximately 33,000.”

“The impact of the tax on indirect employment would be approximately 132,000 jobs, for a total job loss due to the tax of as many as 165,000 jobs.”

“We have restructured our business, including significant layoffs…We have reduced service levels to customers. We will consider adding headcount if there is a repeal,” said one company surveyed in the report.

“Adding offices and employment outside US (EU and Asia) in lieu of US jobs. Modest numbers today, but will increase in upcoming years,” according to one company surveyed.

“Almost one-third of respondents (30.6%) said they had reduced R&D as the result of the tax.”

“Almost 10 percent of respondents said they had relocated manufacturing outside of the U.S. or expanded manufacturing abroad rather than in the U.S. because of the tax.”

“58% of respondents said they would consider reducing employment if the device tax were not repealed.”

“50% said they would consider reducing R&D investment if the device tax were not repealed.”

  So, who are you going to believe: a healthcare trade organization or Kathleen Sebelius’s lying eyes?

11 Comments leave one →
  1. bydesign001's avatar
    February 18, 2014 10:14 pm

    Reblogged this on PUMABydesign001's Blog and commented:
    Unintended consequences? I think not. Cloward & Piven? You betcha.

    Like

  2. AKA John Galt's avatar
    February 18, 2014 10:39 pm

    Reblogged this on U.S. Constitutional Free Press.

    Like

  3. zip's avatar
    zip permalink
    February 18, 2014 11:38 pm

    Reminds me of the photo ops of the so-called Dr.s in their whites supporting BO when he was presenting it years ago. http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=obama%20and%20doctors&go=&form=QBIL&qs=n#a
    So desiring a fix to a broken medical system. Solution: Just get rid of it and install a tax.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      February 19, 2014 6:34 am

      I always get a laugh out of those commercials for a medical device or some new wight loss program where a guy in a white coat with a stethoscope draped over his shoulders tells us he is a medical doctor, that is what I think of when I see that picture.

      Like

  4. Chris's avatar
    Chris permalink
    February 19, 2014 12:05 am

    Don’t confuse me with the facts! The battle cry of this administration.

    Like

  5. Brittius's avatar
    February 19, 2014 5:59 am

    Reblogged this on Brittius.com.

    Like

Leave a comment