Planned Parenthood didn’t always get consent before harvesting baby organs
Since the news broke about Planned Parenthood’s policy on selling the organs and tissue of aborted babies to fetal tissue procurement companies for research the agency has sworn that this is only done with the consent of the pregnant woman. However a new video has been released in which a woman who worked with Planned Parenthood for StemExpress claims this was not always the case.
Here is more:
O’Donnell says that the pressure from her employers to procure valuable fetal tissue made her mission to harvest organs not an “option,” but a “demand.” She charges that techs working Planned Parenthood clinics didn’t always take the time to actually make that demand of the abortion mill’s clients: “If there was a higher gestation, and the technicians needed it, there were times when they would just take what they wanted. And these mothers don’t know. And there’s no way they would know.”
She goes on to say that pregnancies are viewed as “potential specimens” and because of this it is all about “taking advantage of the opportunities.” If this is the true mindset of many of Planned Parenthood “procurement” agents then it seems possible the agency would have an interest in making sure it can provide as many abortions as possible without concern for what is actually best for the pregnant woman.
Which brings to mind another reason, in my opinion, why Planned Parenthood might skip out on asking consent from a scared, pregnant teenager and that is because if they were to ask this girl if she would consent to give up her baby’s heart, liver, and other organs after the procedure is over it might cause her to reconsider her decision after realizing the thing growing inside of her is not just a mass of cells and tissue after all. Never let an “opportunity” go to waste…
Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium
America's Watchtower 
It makes no difference. There is no public outcry only excuses and indifference by the liberals with the RINO’s cowering in a fetal position- no pun intended- lest they offend democrat voters and women everywhere. This is the precursor to euthanasia waited for since the Wilson administration.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Bingo. euthanasia is next on the docket.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It can’t be that far off!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sadly you are right; apparently we have reached the point where the respect for life is gone. Nobody seems to care about this and that is very troubling to say the least.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ya know Peter, doesn’t it just blow your mind that Political Correctness has helped to NUMB brains to the massive killings that are going on in our own country? Yet, they will stand in picket lines to defend Cecil the lion. They jump on the Lion Bandwagon (now I love animals and will defend them to my dying day but PEOPLE come first!). How can a person be horrified at the Euthanasia all around the world of innocent people of all ages and ethnicity yet still be so damn BLIND! Only God can open eyes that tightly closed….
LikeLiked by 1 person
No offense to believers but I think God has left this non-God fearing country to fend for itself.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No offence taken Peter… 🙂 I will keep my faith intact but sure understand why you would say it. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
People’s priorities sure are in the wrong place Lorra!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Boy, I’LL SAY!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Brittius.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks again.
LikeLike
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When I first heard about this ( I refuse to watch the videos – there’s only so much evil to which I will choose to subject myself ) I knew there was no way PP was always obtaining the consent of the woman to use the tissue…I just knew it! There was just.no.way.
I acknowledge that abortion is sometimes necessary, however, it should never be used as a means of birth control. I loathe that so many women are so stupid as to actually fall for the lie that abortion is about women being able to control their own bodies, that it’s about taking that control away from men.
Speaking only to the survival of our species, there is nothing more important to women than protecting the children they conceive – before and after they are born. Why, why, why would any woman want to kill her own child???? How have we allowed ourselves to be so fooled into believing that the ability to kill our children in utero is a good thing???
LikeLiked by 1 person
I could not agree more with everything you wrote Laura! I never bought into the whole argument that there was always consent either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is where the strategy of the group that put together the videos was not well planned. Rather than start with videos that were clearly hacks designed to generate an emotional response (yes, I realize this is not a popular opinion here), they should have started with example of actual violations such as this one and having the techs change procedures. As it is, they damaged their credibility with those they hope to convince and now those people are not listening.
As I noted on a different forum, they are also supposed to have the permission of the father as well. How much you want to be bet that was not happening either?
LikeLiked by 2 people
That is an interesting take on it, I think the strategy was to start off on a “smaller” level and then as PP defends itself to come out with the more graphic stuff. I did not know the father had to give permission, I always thought he didn’t have a say in it one way or the other when it comes to abortion.
LikeLike
The permission is only necessary for the donation of tissue. SCOTUS has already ruled that men don’t have a right to stop an abortion.
LikeLike
I think there is a saying that goes something like, win their minds and the hearts will follow.
LikeLike