Hillary Clinton’s State Department spent millions of taxpayer dollars to help companies outsource jobs

  Large corporations have come under heavy scrutiny in recent years for outsourcing American jobs. Most of the scrutiny has come from the Democrats which is why I find this story to be so interesting if it is true. Apparently Hillary Clinton’s State Department spent millions of taxpayer dollars to help foreign nations improve their outsourcing capacity.

  Here is more:

In 2010, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) spent tens of millions of taxpayer dollars building schools in Sri Lanka and Armenia, specifically to increase those countries’ outsourcing capacity to take away American jobs.

“The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is an independent federal agency that receives overall foreign policy guidance from the Secretary of State… USAID plans its development and assistance programs in coordination with the Department of State,” according to the State Department’s website.

  And that is not all:

The head of USAID at the time was Rajiv Shah, who was a former top director with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Microsoft has been one of the nation’s biggest lobbyist for expansive immigration policies, which would allow corporations to replace American tech workers with foreign laborers who will work for a fraction of the Americans workers’ salary. For example, in 2014 Microsoft pushed for greater admissions of low-wage foreign workers into the United States at the same time as the tech giant was laying off 18,000 of its own employees.

  Yet Hillary Clinton is telling the American people that she understands what we are going through and she says she is the only candidate who is really for the average American but that is not what her actions suggest.

  Elizabeth Warren is the most outspoken person in the Senate when it comes to bashing large corporations for taking advantage of the policies of the USAID, which is overseen by the State Department, and yet we have not heard a peep about this from the Massachusetts Senator. In fact she endorsed Hillary Clinton, did she not?

  Of course we all know Elizabeth Warren is not the person she has successfully claimed to be because in addition to checking the box she also made a small fortune flipping foreclosed homes. Which side are these people really on?

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium