Domestic spying to increase under Donald Trump
When the Presidential election cycle first kicked off about two years ago I honestly believed that domestic spying would be a factor in the election. I thought this might actually be an issue with young people who were upset with the internet, especially social media, tracking however it turned out not to be the case when the two parties each nominated supporters of domestic spying.
If you were not happy with Barack Obama’s domestic spying programs (some of which were eventually scaled back) you are not going to be happy with this report–I know I am not!
Here is more:
The FBI, National Security Agency and CIA are likely to gain expanded surveillance powers under President-elect Donald Trump and a Republican-controlled Congress, a prospect that has privacy advocates and some lawmakers trying to mobilize opposition.
Trump’s first two choices to head law enforcement and intelligence agencies — Republican Senator Jeff Sessions for attorney general and Republican Representative Mike Pompeo for director of the Central Intelligence Agency — are leading advocates for domestic government spying at levels not seen since the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
An “already over-powerful surveillance state” is about to “be let loose on the American people,” said Daniel Schuman, policy director for Demand Progress, an internet and privacy advocacy organization.
And here is more:
In a reversal of curbs imposed after Edward Snowden’s revelations in 2013 about mass data-gathering by the NSA, Trump and Congress may move to reinstate the collection of bulk telephone records, renew powers to collect the content of e-mails and other internet activity, ease restrictions on hacking into computers and let the FBI keep preliminary investigations open longer.
“Under the proposed rules, the government would now be able to obtain a single warrant to access and search thousands or millions of computers at once; and the vast majority of the affected computers would belong to the victims, not the perpetrators, of a cybercrime,” Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat who serves on the Intelligence Committee, said in a statement.
That is only the beginning, there is much more which you can read about in the above-linked article. This is the biggest reason why I did not support or vote for Donald Trump. Remember the outcry when we learned about the metadata collection program under Barack Obama, if Donald Trump has his way the program is coming back on steroids.
People who defend metadata collection and a single warrant to access millions of computers claim that if you are not doing anything wrong you should not be worried about this but I would argue you should be worried because this is a violation of the Fourth Amendment which states all people are to be free from unreasonable searches and that a person must be named in the warrant only after probable cause has been found. We are giving up essential liberty for a little perceived security and I think you all know what Benjamin Franklin had to say about that…
My post signature has never been more fitting:
malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium
Reblogged this on Brittius.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you.
LikeLike
You’re welcome.
LikeLike
Under Hillary we would have no chance to protest the spying programs. Maybe with the MSM exposed as the propaganda arm of the elite we can have a discussion about surveillance. None f the recent “terror attacks” have been detected before they occurred. So much for gathering data.
Part of the reason for these articles is to smear Trump’s cabinet selections. There are enough problems at Justice to keep Sessions busy without getting involved in domestic spying.
Give the FBI more power? The FBI is a very discredited operation and needs a major overhaul. Unfortunately Comedy has 2 more years. Additionally there are way too many intelligence agencies with too much power. The FBI does not need to be in the spy business.
All this data collection has been a waste of time and money. Yes the idiot Rep are chomping at the bit to continue the “war on terror” absent any clue as to the end goal.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly, with what we now know about the FBI the last thing we want to do is give them more power!
LikeLike
I’m not sure about jumping on Bloomberg’s perspective. Not to say that surveillance won’t increase, but the sensationalism (fear platform) they project is to stir up distrust and animosity toward Trump. Why haven’t they stated a concern w/ Bari doing his ‘unfair share?’ Trumpss been getting down on CNN for being a lying machine, unlike Hilly who was knocking the ALT news. Some need to be ‘watched’ and he can start within the Gov. body itself!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe they could get to the bottom of the supposed pedophile ring in DC.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah that’s sickening CJ. But it’s actually part of elitist ‘religion’ doing those perversions and more. The black robes w/ hoods type of rituals. They’ll push to make it ‘ok’ in this culture if allowed. Consider what’s acceptable today that wasn’t 10-20 years ago. Devaluing the social framework and human Life.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You may be right about the article however Trump did say he wanted increased spying so I guess we will have to wait and see.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is very concerning.. I agree. Blackmail of almost anyone will be possible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hopefully Zip is right and this is only a hit piece but Trump did say he wanted increased spying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Something from Rush about ‘fake news’: Obama Complains About Fake News to Magazine That Prints Fake News http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/11/30/obama_complains_about_fake_news_to_magazine_that_prints_fake_news
‘ … there’s Obama at Rolling Stone, praising them as the kind of news media we need in order to get the country back on the right track. A fake news story in Rolling Stone that’s probably gonna cost ’em more than $7.5 million in damages, and there Obama is complaining about fake news to one of their reporters.’
It’s all about the source and intent – whether it’s ‘fake news’ or ‘targeted surveillance’ (which has been going on for years already: IRS, NSA, CIA, FBI, Homeland, etc.!).
LikeLiked by 1 person
This reminds me of George on Seinfeld when he was asked how to beat a lie detector test and he said you are not telling a lie if you believe it. I wonder if the MSM actually believes the lies they are telling the American people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suppose people can be so ‘swayed’ that they lose their moral/ethical compass and believe what they’re doing is right/good. Some though are soooo deceived that they ‘figure whatever it takes’ is justified. Then again Steve your interpretation of Good might not be there’s and that’s where we are I think: when evil is called good and good evil (notice the advertising of products using the words evil, wicked, monster, beast, etc.)!
LikeLiked by 1 person
With the MSM outed as the fake phony lying frauds they are, stirring up the pot whether it be supposed increased spying by Trump’s administration or perceived conflicts of interest with his business while Hillary selling national security interest to parties donating to the Clinton Crime Family Initiative raises nary an eyebrow, these “news” outlets may have to broadcast naked in order to get viewers to watch. Hmm, maybe I’ll go back to watching FOX…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is funny how the media is suddenly willing to report about potential conflicts of interest now after ignoring Hillary’s all these years but of course we wouldn’t have expected anything else.
LikeLike