Video: Rand Paul discussing the ‘wiretapping’ of Donald Trump
The possible wiretapping of Trump Tower has become a big issue with the left and the mainstream media since the President made the accusation a couple of weeks ago. Clear minded people understand that Donald Trump mis-tweeted when he used the term “wiretapped” because it is pretty clear he meant Trump Tower was under surveillance. This does not excuse the President but it does provide the left with fodder to ignore the real problem.
We know that somebody was conducting surveillance because that person released the transcripts of a conversation Michael Flynn had with a foreign ambassador. The real question here should be, who is criminally leaking transcripts of a private conversation?
Earlier today Rand Paul explained the real problem of low level government employees being able to “unmask”Americans and he nailed the true crux of the issue.
Here is the video:
America's Watchtower 
Not too long ago we were being told that we should be focusing on what was in the leaks rather than who was responsible for leaking it. Amazing how things change when the leaker is undermining the Republican regime. I have this crazy thought: both sides are right. We need to figure out who is leaking and we need to investigate the alleged connections between Trump and Russia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Back last Oct a story was released about a Russian bank which was supposedly connected to a server in Trump Tower. This led to latter stories that this was the justification for the FISA court order. Well it turns out the bank is still finding attempts by someone to spoof/hack the banks computer to access the Trump computer.
Add to this Yahoo was hacked by ….. A Russian hacker at a bank!
Where there is smoke there is fire!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Interesting, I don’t remember that story. I have a feeling Trump knows more than he is saying right now and eventually it will come out.
LikeLike
WASHINGTON — For much of the summer, the F.B.I. pursued a widening investigation into a Russian role in the American presidential campaign. Agents scrutinized advisers close to Donald J. Trump, looked for financial connections with Russian financial figures, searched for those involved in hacking the computers of Democrats, and even chased a lead — which they ultimately came to doubt — about a possible secret channel of email communication from the Trump Organization to a Russian bank.
Now how did the Times know this information?
LikeLiked by 2 people
A good question…
LikeLike
If Russians did hack, preventing Hilly from getting in (from all her hackers rigging the machines) I say “THANK YOU!”
While this red herring tactic is going on much more pertinent things are happening!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is also being used to divert attention away from the fact the Democrats were caught rigging the primary.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep – they don’t speak to that do they! Feeling ‘justified’ for anything they do or who they are. Good point.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Brittius.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you.
LikeLike
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Baloney. Should we have focused on Ellsberg or on the Pentagon Papers?
LikeLike