WikiLeaks: the CIA can disguise its own hacking to make it look like it was Russia
Have you ever heard of the CIA’s Marble software? That is a rhetorical question because most likely you have not. Until today that is: WikiLeaks has released more documents which confirms the CIA can disguise its own hacking by making it appear as if the hacking came from foreign nations such as Russia and China. This rumor was on the internet several weeks ago and now this latest document dump confirms the CIA’s Marble software can do just that.
Here is more:
WikiLeaks has published hundreds more files today which it claims show the CIA went to great lengths to disguise its own hacking attacks and point the finger at Russia, China, North Korea and Iran.
The 676 files released today are part of WikiLeaks’ Vault 7 tranche of files and they claim to give an insight into the CIA’s Marble software, which can forensically disguise viruses, trojans and hacking attacks.
WikiLeaks says the source code suggests Marble has test examples in Chinese, Russian, Korean, Arabic and Farsi (the Iranian language).
It says: ‘This would permit a forensic attribution double game, for example by pretending that the spoken language of the malware creator was not American English, but Chinese.’
This could lead forensic investigators into wrongly concluding that CIA hacks were carried out by the Kremlin, the Chinese government, Iran, North Korea or Arabic-speaking terror groups such as ISIS.
Well that is pretty interesting don’t you think? The Democrats have been deflecting the American people away from the content contained within the WikiLeaks documents which showed the party rigged the primary for Hillary Clinton by using this Russian angle and now this calls into question even that.
It might sound like tinfoil hat material to suggest the CIA might be behind the hacking but it should be remembered that Barack Obama’s DHS did try to hack into Indiana’s and Georgia’s state elections under the guise of trying to “help” those states ensure there election systems were safe…
malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium
America's Watchtower 
Trump was going to upset the apple cart. He said so. I have no doubt that all manner of nefarious activity took place. Whether we will find the real truth remains to be seen. Yet this latest batch of Wiki leaks has made barely a ripple in the news.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We will never know everything that took place, and it is probably still taking place behind the scenes.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Bunker your use of the word ‘nefarious’ brought this to mind: Do you think Bush Jr. – if he were Pres. today – would be involved in uncovering some of these nefarious activities? Since he was ‘primed’ to bring in the UN-Patriot act and a war – that just happened to be one on the list of the Deep State takeover – I wonder. Draining the swamp is something that’s includes more faces than the last regime, as you know. Shining the light of truth on the swamp is to show the real lies and liars. Where to find the light of truth to shine though! and know it when we see it!
A bit off topic but reminder: General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned – Seven Countries In Five Years. How many are left on the chopping board? How many turned a ‘blind eye’ to this and other ‘nefarious ongoing activities’ all part of the Agenda. ” …“coup” being plotted by Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and what he called “a half dozen other collaborators from the Project for the New American Century”: …destroy the governments in 7 countries in five years – we’re going to start with Iraq, and then we’re going to move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.”
Part of a vid that speaks to the ‘policy coup’ that went on:
Some state: Bush attacked Iraq in order to ensure the continued growth of Islamist terrorism in the Middle East. http://www.hirhome.com/iraniraq/iraq-general-intro.htm
When Bush Jr. ‘finished up’ a war Bush Sr. began (Desert Storm) the coincidence it too obvious. Being able to see these leaders for ‘who they are’ not ‘what we want them to be’ requires great discernment!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am not sure he would. He did give us the PATRIOT Act after all and had no problem with wiretapping…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Snowden comes to mind: who “… gradually lost faith in the federal government, believed it to be engaged in illegal, immoral acts, and decided to gather and leak some of its secrets.” Bush and Obama Spurred Edward Snowden to Spill U.S. Secrets https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/08/the-misdeeds-that-prompted-edward-snowden-to-spill-us-secrets/378963/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting article, thanks for sharing it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, the Obama administration hacked their own party and made it look like Russians and leaked it to Assange for the purposes of damaging their candidate and allowing the Republican to win so that they undermine the Republican administration? That makes absolutely no sense at all. Occam’s razor would say that the Democrat’s claim is most likely to be true.
I do not trust Assange what says at all. He considers himself at war with the US and will do anything to destroy us. He is most likely trying to distract and deflect attention away from the Czar and Putin. At this point, what those leaked documents say is no longer relevant (Clinton lost). What is relevant is whether or not the Czar is compromised which is a national security issue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How can people, ‘let’s ALL just get along’ when everyone has their own personal agenda and motives! Lie’s cracks are filled w/ some truth to help keep them together! That’s why the World 1984 Order has strict “conformity” and “no subjectivity” … all are one. You’re just not in the groove … yet … Terrant! And you know what ‘happens’ to does who don’t conform!
That last admin. used many ‘false flags’ to push their agenda ~ TSA is a prime example (who allowed the underwear bomber thru – that the Regime ‘set up’)!
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is always a little truth mixed in, isn’t there? Playing off a small truth is the best way to make the lie believable!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, like the serpent and the tree of knowledge – of good and evil.
God tells them: ‘But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. Gen 2:17
‘And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:’ Gen 3:4
Wrong! we’ve been dying off ever since!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Which groove are you talking about: It seems that I am surrounded by them.
I do have to agree the Obama administration operated in a rather Machiavellian fashion. However, this claim defies logic. Assange is essentially saying that US intelligence hacked the DNC making it look like Russia, passed the emails to him knowing that he would use them against Clinton. If the deep state is against Mr. Trump, why in the heck would they even do that? I’m not saying that it is not possible but I am going with Occams Razor on this.
In case you forgot, Assange has been attacking the US during the last part of Bush II’s administration and all of Obama’s. Since he helped take down Clinton, he is suddenly a good guy? Yeah, right. He works with Russia and has been supported by them for a long while. He very rarely ever attacks Russia and has attacked those who exposed corruption within the Russian oligarchy. I will say the leaks don’t lie but he does cherry pick what gets leaked (keep in mind that he said he had stuff on Mr. Trump but didn’t release it). Take whatever he says with a healthy dose of skepticism.
I do agree that the Democrats do not have pure motives here but that does not mean they are wrong. I’ve been researching what facts I can find. There is not enough evidence to say that he colluded but there is certainly enough circumstantial evidence to merit a serious investigation. Plus, the way that this Republican regime is acting, I have to wonder if there is a cover-up going on.
In the Senate investigation (which seems to be where the adults are taking this seriously), it was revealed that the Russians were targeting Republican candidates as early as February 2016. Marco Rubio was one of their targets. Think about that, the true conservatives might have been bumped off with the help of Russia.
I would not be so quick to dismiss this as “fake news” but then again, I am talking to people who are clearly going to believe everything that the Czar tweets.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, you’ve dug more into than I. The ‘groove’ I was talking about was ‘falling into line’ the way the ‘powers that be’ (Oligarchy) want you to (Machiavellian fashion). It’s difficult to know the truth of the matter at times, especially like you state ‘cherry picking’ and ‘personal bents’. All I know is I’m glad Hilly didn’t get in and pray Barack is shutdown instead of being involved w/ the COUP (Jarrett / Soros / whoever else). There’s a graphic out with Putin grinning stating, “Yes, I hacked the election, and gave you Obama!” Can’t find it in a search, maybe it was ‘removed’ by Obama’s hackers. If you remember, when he won the 2nd time there was a pic of him standing in a room with his personal ‘hackers’ and weeping in gratitude. I don’t really read Assange postings. But, just like Drudge each have their own bias … human nature. That’s for your info Terrant, I hope I explained enough! (btw I wonder if Trump got rid of all the Bari’s Czar’s? Sometimes I catch Putin’s tweets too, fair is fair!).
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Brittius.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you.
LikeLike
You’re welcome.
LikeLike
Thanks s is beyond the scope of most Americans. The entertainment value is lost on us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Came across this and it puts somethings into perspective:
See How Too Much Government Is Destroying Generations Of Americans
http://ulstermanbooks.com/see-much-government-destroying-generations-americans/
When you view the graph it shows how TV’s have become more affordable vs other things that ‘add to our lives’! Keeping people programmed is vital to Deep State Gov. takeover.
LikeLike