Skip to content

Democrat Adam Schiff admits it was not appropriate for the Clinton campaign to conspire with Ukraine during the election

July 16, 2017

  With all of the media frenzy surrounding the possibility that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia it would be nice if the mainstream media was as concerned about the fact that, as Politico reported back in January, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee did in fact collude with Ukraine during the election and it actually did impact the Trump campaign.

  In my opinion ignoring the one story while feverishly covering the other story is proof that most of the coverage is politically motivated. If the mainstream media was truly interested in protecting the integrity of the democratic process they would be equally concerned about both stories.

  Earlier today ABC finally showed some interest in the Clinton/Ukraine collusion scandal when the network asked Democratic Representative Adam Schiff if it was acceptable for the Democrats to accept help from Ukraine and he admitted it would not be appropriate. He went on to say it would be problematic. The tense he uses is interesting because he seems to be speaking hypothetically when there is proof this actually happened.

  Here is the video of the exchange:

  He makes some interesting points however his analogy falls short on three counts: First; he points to the fact that there has only been one story written about the Clinton/Ukraine collusion scandal. Again I point back to the media bias and their unwillingness to cover this story for political reasons.

  Second; while the scale of interference might not be the same he is ignoring the fact that Ukraine did in fact conspire with the Clinton campaign while there is still no proof the Trump campaign conspired with Russia although Donald Trump Jr. was willing to conspire with the Russians.

  Third; he is ignoring the fact that Russia was trying to hack into both the Republicans and the Democrats in order to dig up dirt on both sides during the election. The difference being the Democrats ignored the FBI’s warnings because they thought it might be a prank call and did not secure their email system while the Republicans took the threat seriously and implemented the suggested changes making themselves immune from the problem which is now plaguing the Democrats.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

14 Comments leave one →
  1. Brittius permalink
    July 16, 2017 7:17 pm

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. July 16, 2017 11:25 pm

    The latest on the DNC hack

    * Due to the estimated speed of transfer (23 MB/s) calculated in this study, it is unlikely that this initial data transfer could have been done remotely over the Internet.
    * The initial copying activity was likely done from a computer system that had direct access to the data. By “direct access” we mean that the individual who was collecting the data either had physical access to the computer where the data was stored, or the data was copied over a local high speed network (LAN).

    What is interesting is Rep Debbie Wasserman Schultz hired Awan a Pakistani IT tech who is now being investigated. Awan had access to Congressional Democrats’ emails. Poor Debbie is pissed because she can’t get her laptop returned from the Capitol Police.

    I wonder if Awan obtained access to the DNC computer because of Debbie and downloaded the DNC files?

    Liked by 2 people

    • July 17, 2017 5:27 am

      This Awan is one of the brothers who fled the country after the election, isn’t he? There is something fishy about this whole thing. I read elsewhere about this not having been done over the internet and yet none of this is being reported.


  3. July 16, 2017 11:31 pm

    An agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act, along with an intent to achieve the agreement’s goal. Most U.S. jurisdictions also require an overt act toward furthering the agreement. An overt act is a statutory requirement, not a constitutional one. See Whitfield v. United States, 453 U.S. 209 (2005). The illegal act is the conspiracy’s “target offense.” Wex Legal Dictionary

    I fail to see how anything Don Jr. did meets this definition. Hillary on the other hand …

    Liked by 1 person

    • July 17, 2017 5:28 am

      Still hoping this will come back on the Democrats but I am not counting on it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • July 17, 2017 7:38 am

        Well two more have been Arkancide. A Haitian who was going to testify against the Clinton Foundation was found dead. Also the idiot who was looking for Hillary’s email killed himself.

        Bubba and Hill are above the law and get away with murder.

        Liked by 2 people

      • July 17, 2017 7:08 pm

        I heard about these, what strange coincidences! 😉


    • July 17, 2017 4:17 pm

      This reminds me of the laptop that was ‘conveniently’ stolen from the backset of the unlock car that just happened to have classified info. That could’ve been the way they accessed it OR Hilly just gave it to them on a flash drive/HD.
      This reminds me of the old B/W movie that make the ‘good guys’ dumb as rocks and the ‘evil bad guy’ smart and conniving – It’s like they place blindfolds on the law enforcement, spin them around and give them a paper tail to pin on the donkey then face them toward the Dem*s enemies.

      Liked by 1 person

      • July 17, 2017 7:10 pm

        I totally forgot about that until you mentioned it! But it seems likely this is how they could have got the info. The flash drive is an option as well because as CJ commented earlier it has been reported that this could not have been downloaded that quickly via email.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. July 17, 2017 2:58 pm

    “Yes” it was very ‘Leftist’ of her, but that’s what she and her’s do!
    Also, Steve the Dem*s have their own hackers, so they have to protect ‘um (not saying the RINO’s don’t have theirs too).
    These people always make it ‘sound’ like their ‘wanting to get to the truth of the matter’ but that’s just their MO ploy. Darkness can’t understand Light: And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. (John 1:3) The Word of Truth (Light) has nothing to do w/ them – they’re blinded by the Lie system they serve. Those who’s word and life are based on the Lie can’t comprehend Truth. To them it’s blinding!
    Politics and religion are very much alike and probably one and the same spirit: They both warn you against the very things they’re doing.

    Liked by 1 person

    • July 17, 2017 7:12 pm

      Yep, they don’t really want to get to the truth because they know the truth and they are in on it, it is just a show so we will think there are two sides in Washington when really there is not. I love the John 1:3 quote!

      Liked by 1 person


  1. If All You See… » Pirate's Cove

Leave a Reply to Steve Dennis Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: