Dianne Feinstein admits she has still not seen any evidence of Russian collusion

  The investigation into possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign has been going on for roughly one year. Paul Manafort and two others have been arrested as a result of this investigation and today NBC reported that Robert Mueller has enough evidence to bring charges against Michael Flynn.

  Much like the charges against the others it appears as if Michael Flynn could be charged with possible money laundering and lying to Federal agents. Nothing related to colluding with the Russians to change the outcome of the election.

  Today Dianne Feinstein appeared on CNN and she was asked about Russian collusion and had to admit that to date she has still not seen any evidence, here is the video:

      The Democrats are going to revel in the news of another possible indictment in the Russian collusion investigation, and this should be expected, but after one year of investigating this case it is looking more and more likely that no evidence will be brought forth in relation to the original intent of the investigation–unless one of these people can be flipped.

  During the campaign Trump supporters assured us that Donald Trump’s lack of experience in government was nothing to worry about because he would surround himself with smart people who would be able to offset his inexperience. While to date none of these arrests points to any conclusion I think it is fair to call the President’s judgement into question. It is pretty clear he did not properly vet any of these people.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium