Mark Warner was texting with a Russian lobbyist about the dossier

As I wrote yesterday, thing are getting very interesting in regards to the Russia collusion investigation. For all intents and purposes it now appears as if the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee were colluding with a foreign agent on behalf of Russia to dig up dirt on Donald Trump. But that is just the beginning. Here is more from America’s Watchtower from yesterday:

We learned that the FBI used the Russian dossier as well as a Yahoo! article to gain a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign and transition teams while neglecting to tell the court the dossier was unconfirmed as well as failing to inform the FISA court that the dossier was funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign. In other words the FBI did not disclose to the FISA court all available information, which is a crime.

  We also learned that while the Yahoo! article was used as a “second source” to gain the warrant that Christopher Steele was behind the Yahoo! article, meaning that there was only one source using two different platforms to get his (and the DNC’s and the Clinton campaign’s) message out there. And the mainstream media was complicit in this as well.

  Now Julian Assange is claiming that the man who wrote the Yahoo! article was also “working with” the Democratic National Committee for several weeks

  Earlier today it was reported here that two more high-ranking government officials are stepping down after having been named in the text between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page but that it not the big news of the day.

  The big news of the day is this report that the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, Senator Mark Warner, was in contact via text messages with a Russian lobbyist seeking to set up a private meeting over the discredited Democratic Party funded Russian dossier. Here is more:

 Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump’s alleged ties to Russia, had extensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages obtained exclusively by Fox News.

“We have so much to discuss u need to be careful but we can help our country,” Warner texted the lobbyist, Adam Waldman, on March 22, 2017.

“I’m in,” Waldman, whose firm has ties to Hillary Clinton, texted back to Warner.

Secrecy seemed very important to Warner as the conversation with Waldman heated up March 29, when the lobbyist revealed that Steele wanted a bipartisan letter from Warner and the committee’s chairman, North Carolina Republican Sen. Richard Burr, inviting him to talk to the Senate intelligence panel.

Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop — at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would “rather not have a paper trail” of his messages.

  I am sure Mark Warner will claim this was done as part of the investigation into Donald Trump but if so why the secrecy? Why did he not want anybody else on the Intelligence Committee to know what he was up to if he simply had a lead he was following up on?

  And of course there are ties to Hillary Clinton:

Over the course of four months between February and May 2017, Warner and Waldman also exchanged dozens of texts about possible testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee from Deripaska, Waldman’s primary Russian billionaire client.

In January 2009, Harper’s Magazine reported that Deripaska had hired an advisory firm with close ties to Hillary Clinton to help him get a visa to enter the United States.” 

  At this point I have to admit it is hard for me to keep all of this straight, it is getting more complicated by the day, but the one thing I do know is that it looks as if the truth is 180 degrees opposite of what the Democrats and the mainstream media would have us believe.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium