Inspector General releases scathing report on Andrew McCabe
When Jeff Sessions fired Andrew McCabe just two days before he was set to retire with a full pension many on the left, forgetting the recommendation came from the FBI, went crazy–attacking the Trump administration and claiming Andrew McCabe did not deserve to be fired.
Since that time we have been awaiting the FBI Inspector General’s report and it is finally out. It shows us, according to this story, that Andrew McCabe “lacked candor” at least three times while under oath, he “lacked candor” with the Inspector General, and with James Comey as well.
Here is more:
We found that, in a conversation with then-Director Comey shortly after the
WSJ article was published, McCabe lacked candor when he told Comey, or made
statements that led Comey to believe, that McCabe had not authorized the
disclosure and did not know who did. This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.5
(Lack of Candor – No Oath).We also found that on May 9, 2017, when questioned under oath by FBI
agents from INSD, McCabe lacked candor when he told the agents that he had not
authorized the disclosure to the WSJ and did not know who did. This conduct
violated FBI Offense Code 2.6 (Lack of Candor – Under Oath).
We further found that on July 28, 2017, when questioned under oath by the
OIG in a recorded interview, McCabe lacked candor when he stated: (a) that he
was not aware of Special Counsel having been authorized to speak to reporters
around October 30 and (b) that, because he was not in Washington, D.C., on
October 27 and 28, 2016, he was unable to say where Special Counsel was or what
she was doing at that time. This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.6 (Lack of
Candor – Under Oath).We additionally found that on November 29, 2017, when questioned under
oath by the OIG in a recorded interview during which he contradicted his prior
statements by acknowledging that he had authorized the disclosure to the WSJ,
McCabe lacked candor when he: (a) stated that he told Comey on October 31,
2016, that he had authorized the disclosure to the WSJ; (b) denied telling INSD
agents on May 9 that he had not authorized the disclosure to the WSJ about the
PADAG call; and (c) asserted that INSD’s questioning of him on May 9 about the
October 30 WSJ article occurred at the end of an unrelated meeting when one of
the INSD agents pulled him aside and asked him one or two questions about the
article. This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.6 (Lack of Candor – Under Oath).
In other words Andrew McCabe lied several times, sometimes under oath and sometimes not. Of course saying a person “lacked candor” is a nice way of saying that person lied.
So despite all of the faux outrage it turns out Andrew McCabe deserved to be fired, but in actuality that should just be the beginning–he should be prosecuted. Michael Flynn resigned after it was learned he mislead Mike Pence, he was charged with lying to the FBI and eventually plead guilty to one felony change and is awaiting sentencing.
Here we have Andrew McCabe lying several times and so he should he held to the same standard as Michael Flynn. I do not expect that to happen but maybe I will be surprised.
malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium
Trackbacks
- Republican lawmakers send criminal referrals to Jeff Sessions for Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Loretta Lynch | America's Watchtower
- FLASHBACK: AG Sessions said he will not prosecute Clinton or any deep State Criminals | BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!
- Inspector General recommends criminal investigation against Andrew McCabe | America's Watchtower
America's Watchtower 
Why not say lie? They sure don’t mind saying it when it goes down our way… yes, I won’t hold my breath.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree! They sure do like to soften the wording when it fits.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lie doesn’t go with their program.
I’d read that there’s a difference between the ‘One World Order’ (which we’ve been living under) and the ‘New [and Improved] World Order’ which is now replacing it.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_nwo.htm
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the link, I will check it out. I have used the terms “One World Order” and “New World Order” interchangeably, I didn’t know there was a difference. I guess it is kind of like “global warming” and “climate change.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
OT but relevant to this.
I received an email from Twitter informing me my acct had been “locked for violating” Twit rules. The tweet wasn’t mine. Someone hacked my acct and put a tweet that would have me shut down for a while (9-11hrs in the penalty {mental} box) = taking away 1st Amendment right and ‘being convicted’ and punished for someone else’s doing.
Look how ‘quick’ they were to ‘convict and penalize me’! And how “slow and drawn out” into BoredomVille these ‘New World actors’ conduct their shady biz.
Jesus told Paul “it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.” and that relates to this. The 💩🐍👺👹👿 are the guilty, the ungodly.
Twitter could’ve done it themselves, not liking that I’m posting things that goes against the ‘push’ of info. that goes with their indoctrinations and propaganda. But I’m just a small fry, what damage do I do? 😩😢 😷 🤣
The question: How many more tweets are out there that a person didn’t post, rather someone else did under their name?
I contacted Twit and told them “NOT MY TWEET”. How long will it be until they email me and open my acct. (sooner than 9 hrs)? Will they apologize? Will they feel my pain😧 and anguish 😱 for being charged for something I didn’t do? Will they find the real culprit? I’ll let u know. 😬
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know its not ‘Sunday Share’ but I’m posting this now in case I forget tomorrow. 😊
It just seems meaningful to apply to our “now moments” and “what is now presently” won’t be later.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hadn’t heard that song before, thanks for sharing it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
People are having their Twitter and FB accounts suspended for exercising free speech when it is against the opinions of the people who run the sites. So much for them being a platform for an open exchange of ideas. I hope you are able to get back on soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True, but this wasn’t even my ‘tweet’. Someone hacked it & tweeted something to get me ‘locked down’.
I filled out the contact form this morning – just a ‘form reply’- no person.
Their ‘penalty clock’ just keeps ticking, so I “deactivated” my acct. They don’t allow you to ‘delete’ or ‘cancel’ it, only ‘deactivate’ it – which is very Nazi mannerism (World Govt) type of “choice”.Stating everything will be deleted after 30 days. But we “know they LIE.” All that info is stored in the ‘BIG & power OZ AI’.
I left them another message and told them I didn’t want their “compromised acct”! that they didn’t respond to my previous message and “we’re NOT nice people”! I’m sure that hurt their feelings alot! 🙃 Ended with I hope the LORD shows them a Better ‘way’. They’re busy following the 💩 god currently!
I think if things continue on this ‘masquerade vein’ this is only going to get worse. More ‘controlling’.
I did see a reply to something I’d commented on, stating: “When you get control of everything you can do what you want.”
And that’s the way it is.
https://hackolo.com/how-to-hack-anyones-twitter-account-online-no-download-required/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s an example of what they sent to me and the “Not My Tweet” ~
https://plus.google.com/+DesignsByDianne/posts/GiiqNToiJ2X
LikeLike
Wow! They even know it wasn’t you and they are still punishing you? That makes no sense, they should have given you the chance to change your password, not punish you for someone else’s action.
LikeLike
Like I mention I cancelled my Twit acct. My brother told me that that’s how they get rid of those who they don’t want using their platform. They’re ‘those’ who whine and get angry about things not being ‘fair’, but ‘fair’ to them is just being and doing it ‘their way.’ Which isn’t ‘fair at all!!
I’ve not received an email from them. Just another example of the ‘beast mentality’ of operations. NOT FAIR & VILE.
LikeLike