Brett Kavanaugh rape accuser admits she lied

  We have said it before but in the left’s zeal to be anything anti-Trump they have become unhinged. Of course when you reach such a frenzied state you are no longer able to think straight and sometimes your judgement becomes impaired and you are not able to make good decisions. 

  Such was the case during the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing. As I wrote here, the first allegation against the then nominee made by Christine Ford was at least plausible and believable, however as the hours went by the left was apparently not satisfied with the vilification of Brett Kavanaugh and the accusations got more and more outrageous and less and less credible as the days wore on.

 The accusations went from a teenage Brett Kavanaugh possibly being a little too aggressive with a classmate before backing down to not only being an full blown rapist  but also participating in several gang rapes.

  Since his confirmation we have seen these stories begin to fall apart; first Michael Avenatti and Julie Swetnick were referred to the Department of Justice for a criminal investigation for lying to the Congress about the gang rape parties, and now another rape accuser has admitted to lying about rape for political reasons and has also been referred to the Department of Justice for a possible criminal investigation.

  Here is more:

The Senate Judiciary Committee has referred a Kentucky woman to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) after she admitted making up an accusation that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh had raped her.

Munro-Leighton contacted the committee via e-mail, claiming that she was “Jane Doe” and that Kavanaugh had raped her. However, she later admitted that she was not “Jane Doe” and had never met Kavanaugh.

In his referral to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director Christopher Wray, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) elaborates:

  And here is more:

Committee investigators began investigating Ms. Munro-Leighton’s allegations. Given her relatively unique name, Committee investigators were able to use open-source research to locate Ms. Munro-Leighton and determine that she: (1) is a left-wing activist; (2) is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh; and (3) lives in neither the Washington DC area nor California, but in Kentucky.

Under questioning by Committee investigators, Ms. Munro-Leighton admitted, contrary to her prior claims, that she had not been sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh and was not the author of the original “Jane Doe” letter. When directly asked by Committee investigators if she was, as she had claimed, the “Jane Doe” from Oceanside California who had sent the letter to Senator Harris, she admitted: “No, no, no. I did that as a way to grab attention. I am not Jane Doe . . . but I did read Jane Doe’s letter. I read the transcript of the call to your Committee. . . . I saw it online. It was news.”

She further confessed to Committee investigators that (1) she “just wanted to get attention”; (2) “it was a tactic”; and (3) “that was just a ploy.” She told Committee investigators that she had called Congress multiple times during the Kavanaugh hearing process – including prior to the time Dr. Ford’s allegations surfaced – to oppose his nomination. Regarding the false sexual-assault allegation she made via her email to the Committee, she said: “I was angry, and I sent it out.”

When asked by Committee investigators whether she had ever met Judge Kavanaugh, she said: “Oh Lord, no.”

  This woman opposed the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh so much–and truth be told would have opposed any nominee with equal hatred–that she not only tried to stop him from getting onto the Supreme Court but had no issue attempting to ruin his life, and  his family’s life, by sending him to jail for a political agenda. This woman needs to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!

  Ironically, as the accusations got more and more absurd, and as these women tried to outdo each other with their oh-yeah-well-he-did-this-to-me stories that instead of undermining Donald Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court they ended up relegating the one credible accusation into obscurity.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium