Benghazi: The real motive behind the terrorist attack and the reasons for the cover up
A new book is coming out about the Benghazi terrorist attack on September 11th which left Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty dead that has a few interesting revelations in it. The authors of the book conducted an interview with Sean Hannity and you can listen to the interview here.
It is now pretty much a given that the gunrunning Obama regime was also running guns captured in Libya to Syria and this book reaffirms it, but now we know that the Obama regime was actually conducting raids in Libya looking for top al Qaeda leaders and this flies in the face of Barack Obama’s promise that we would only provide support for the war effort but would put no boots on the ground.
The terrorist attack on September 11th was in retaliation for these raids, not because of some video that nobody had seen. And these were raids which Barack Obama didn’t want the American people to find out about less they realized he lied to them, this is at least part of the reason for the cover up.
On top of that we learn that Chris Stevens was opposed to this type of action so he wasn’t told about the raids even though he was in danger. Chris Stevens had been pleading for more security for months but he was ignored, because he didn’t know these raids were occurring practically in his neighborhood the situation was even more dangerous than he realized. While he didn’t realize the full extent of how dangerous the situation on the ground was becoming somebody in the Obama regime had to know and yet he was still denied the extra security.
So Chris Stevens was denied extra security, but why weren’t there marines at the consulate as is standard operating procedure? We finally have the answer to that question: because there was no consulate in Benghazi, the complex was officially known as a ‘temporary mission facility’ and this distinction meant the facility was afforded a smaller budget and less security than if this were an official consulate. Chris Stevens had been begging the Obama regime to have the facility designated as a consulate but, just like his requests for more security, his request in this case fell on deaf ears.
We had a president running for reelection who was claiming that his Middle East policy made the world less dangerous, and who was running on the fact that he ended the war in Iraq and was winding down the war in Afghanistan, and he wanted the American people to forget about the actions he was taking in Egypt and Syria, and he certainly did not want the voters to know we had boots on the ground in Libya, because that would run counter to the Nobel Peace Prize winner’s anti-aggression lead from behind public persona.
In fact the revelation that we have boots on the ground was something Barack Obama needed to keep from the American people to keep up his image as a man ending war and securing peace in our lifetime. Thus while the true motive for the terrorist attack was retaliation for these raids, and Barack Obama must have known this, and coupled with the fact that Barack Obama couldn’t admit this was a terrorist attack because it ran counter to his claim al Qaeda was on the run, the regime concocted the ridiculous video excuse that nobody believed in the first place.
“What difference does it make?!”
All of these issues–the gun running, the al Qaeda raids and keeping Chris Stevens in the dark about them, the raids being the true motivation behind the attack, refusing to call this a terrorist attack for political reasons, the ‘consulate’ not being a ‘consulate’, and Chris Stevens being denied extra security–are contributing factors to what now seems to be a multifaceted cover up.
What difference does it make? A world of difference in my opinion, Chris Stevens and the others should be alive today. Wouldn’t you love to hear what the survivors of the attack–who are being hidden–have to say about this?
Trackbacks
- The Benghazi Scandal Is Obama’s Watergate But Worse | Counter Information
- The Benghazi Scandal Is Obama’s Watergate But Worse | Global Research « The Progressive Mind
- Lux Libertas – Light and Liberty » The Benghazi Scandal Is Obama’s Watergate But Worse
- Truth or Consequences: The Democrat’s Biggest Nightmare | Barrow Press
America's Watchtower 
What a sad commentary that a majority, no, probably an overwhelming majority if Americans most likely are tuned out to this latest episode of malfeasance perpetrated by this out of control administration which lacks skill in all arenas excepting dirty politics. Knowing to what depths all medias have sunk to ignore and cover up the unamerican activities both domestic and foreign being conducted by our own government is enough to bring us to tears. For Those of us who watched first hand the destruction of Richard Nixon, the foot in the door provided by a simpleB & E, the Benghazi media cover up is particularly frustrating. The left is in full control of events and the reporting or non reporting of those events.
LikeLike
It’s more than “frustrating”. Charlie Wilson’s methods continue. Coupling traitors in DC with the cacophony of leftist, traitorous media is clearly America’s death knell.
Finding truth, is to become even harder … ‘peace,’ more elusive and a larger, ‘holy’ war, more likely … And the masses? They won’t know the reasons behind any ‘event’ until it’s too late.
LikeLike
Agreed, we won’t know the truth about this for years and by the time we do it will be too late to hold those who are responsible accountable. It is beyond frustrating!
LikeLike
I am too young to remember how the Nixon affair played out but when you compare what he did to what Obama did, and the media reaction to both stories, you can’t help but see what the agenda of the MSM is and always has been.
LikeLike
Thus while the true motive for the terrorist attack was retaliation for these raids~~~~ so Hilary patting Ty Woods’ father on the back promisung to ‘punish those responsible’ and pounding her fists saying we have to make sure this doesn’t happen again, she knew those responsible were themselves. But let’s move on, nothing to see here…Look! Squirrel!
LikeLike
She also told him they would “get” the man who made the video as if he were responsible and I guess in their eyes he is because he is in jail and is the only person who has been punished for this attack.
LikeLike
Clinton was asked whether we were shipping guns to syria via Turkey, and she said “Turkey- why no”. I noticed she jumped. It caught my attention the way she said it. I gathered it probably was going via some other way and she got out of it. Or, she lies like a rug. Take your pick. Everyone is tired of the story except a few of us.
LikeLike
I didn’t see her reaction but it does seem as if she didn’t deny weapons were being run from somewhere into Libya. It is a sad state of affairs that we seem to be the only ones who think this is a major issue.
LikeLike
Interesting. I had read, when we were giving “help” to the Libyan rebels that there were special forces there:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2218332/U-S-special-forces-stand-looming-Libya-strike.html
I knew that we were giving weapons to the people in Libya, too. The gun running portion I had not heard nor had I heard specifically about looking for al Qaeda members.
On the AQ front, I’d think Conservatives could get behind the president (but not on the gun running front).
LikeLike
The gun running aspect has been rumored for quite awhile now and it now appears as if it is true, but this is the first I heard about the al Qaeda raids. I don’t have a problem with the raids but what I do have a problem is with the fact that he lied about not putting boots on the ground.
LikeLike