Court to Hear Hillary Clinton Fundraising Case

A California court is going to hear Hillary Clinton’s fundraising scandal case. I know it is hard to keep up with all of Senator Clinton’s campaign violations, but the one going to court here isn’t the latest one involving Norman Hsu, it is this case in which see is seen on video committing felony campaign violations.

  Here are a few of the details:

Paul’s legal counsel, the United States Justice Foundation (USJF), filed a brief in July. It said the videotape “captures the very commission of a crime, namely, that of knowingly soliciting, coordinating and accepting federal campaign contributions far in excess of the legal limit of $2,000.”

“We will accomplish what Ken Starr wasn’t able to achieve,” Paul told Cybercast News Service, referring to the independent counsel who investigated several Clinton scandals in the 1990s. “We have three judges reviewing Hillary Clinton’s illegal conduct. Presidential candidates have never been forced to defend themselves in court from being a felon.”

Paul contends that in exchange for producing the fundraising event, President Clinton agreed to work as a rainmaker for the company after leaving the White House. Paul said the former president reneged on the agreement, causing investors to pull their money out of the company.

Paul wants to force the New York senator to testify in the case. Paul spent about $2 million to produce a star-studded August 2000 fundraiser that included Cher, Diana Ross, Brad Pitt, Sugar Ray and other Hollywood celebrities.

After failing to properly report the money raised, the Clinton Senate campaign had to pay a $35,000 fineto the FEC. Clinton’s campaign finance director, David Rosen, was accused of lying to the FEC. He was indicted but eventually acquitted.

“Everything I complained about in 2001, and she denied, was supported in the Rosen trial and the FEC,” Paul said. “Only her direct knowledge continues to be denied, and the tape contradicts that. Hillary’s obstruction is worse than Nixon’s obstruction in Watergate.”

  You can read the rest of the article here.