Skip to content

More on New Hampshire’s School Funding Fiasco (Governor Lynch Sucks)

June 11, 2008

 Below is an editorial that appeared in today’s New Hampshire Union Leader reprinted in it’s entirety. This editorial hits on a few of the points that I have been making here for awhile and this just reinforces my opinion of our teflon governor.

 

GOV. JOHN LYNCH’S inability to stop legislative overspending is getting tiresome.

On Monday, Lynch allowed a terrible school funding bill, which he opposes, to become law without his signature. As usual, he waited until the very last moment to make a decision, and it was the wrong one.

 The school funding plan is bad for lots of reasons. The most obvious is that it spends $180 million the state doesn’t have. Spending money the state doesn’t have is becoming a Lynch specialty.

Last year Gov. Lynch signed a state budget that raised general fund spending by $475 million, even though the state didn’t have the revenues needed to meet the increase. That budget is now estimated to end roughly $200 million in the red.

In addition to overspending, the new school funding law brings back donor towns and gives the same base amount of money to each district, rich or poor, regardless of the district’s need. Lynch opposes both of those bad provisions. But he let the bill become law anyway.

We remember a certain governor who managed to prevent legislators from overspending. He simply promised to veto any bill that raised taxes or spending. He ended up having to veto a state budget. But the state didn’t collapse. Instead, legislators realized he meant business, and they fell in line. Runaway spending stopped cold.

That governor’s name was Craig Benson. He was defeated by a fresh-faced former executive named John Lynch who promised to be just as fiscally responsible. Unfortunately, Gov. Lynch hasn’t lived up to that promise, and the result is the biggest state budget increase in two decades and a school aid plan that overspends to the point that it sets us up for an income tax.

We’re pretty sure Benson would have vetoed, or at least threatened to veto, this awful school funding bill, as Lynch should have done. Benson would have found a way to keep legislators from spending money the state doesn’t have. Gov. Lynch said he would do the same. He just hasn’t commanded enough authority in Concord to make it happen.

 

 The first line in this editorial I don’t quite agree with, governor Lynch doesn’t have an inability to stop the overspending, he has an unwillingness to stop the overspending. He wants to overspend. He needs to overspend. I do however agree with the last part of the opening sentence, it is getting tiresome. Expensive also.

 This article is so correct I just can’t wrap my tiny mind around the idea that so many New Hampshire residents fall for his bullshit. The last sentence in this editorial is perfect also. The writer claims Lynch hasn’t “commanded enough authority” to make fiscal responsibility a reality in New Hampshire. I would call it, and have here on many occasions, a serious lack of leadership on behalf of the teflon man.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

One Comment leave one →
  1. RJ's avatar
    January 7, 2009 6:23 am

    Couldn’t agree more – what an ass. There was a time when NH meant old school Yankee pragmatism. Anymore, it looks more and more like that clusterf*ck of a state just to its south.

    Like

Leave a reply to RJ Cancel reply