1/20/09 Was an Inside Job
1/20/09 was an inside job, the fix was in. This president became president via a vast left wing conspiracy. The media’s conspiracy. There was no Pearl Harbor conspiracy, there was no Tonkin Gulf conspiracy, and there was no 9/11 conspiracy, but there was a 1/20/09 conspiracy. A conspiracy born in the media.
The media fell in love with President Obama shortly after Iowa, it was a gradual process as the media was initially reluctant to totally break away from it’s previous love, the Clinton’s. But there was something about then candidate Obama that the media just couldn’t resist.
Was it the way he spoke or his brilliant smile? Or maybe both. Was it the way that listening to Barack Obama speak sent a thrill up and down Chris Matthews leg? Barack Obama seemed to send that thrill up and down the legs of most of the mainstream media who finally did turn on Hillary Clinton.
Chris Matthews later went on to say that it was his job to make Barack Obama’s presidency successful, since when was that the job of the media? They certainly didn’t have that philosophy over the last eight years.
The media ignored stories about Barack Obama that would have brought down most candidates. Stories from Bill Ayers, to Reverend Wright, to bitter gun clinging Americans, to Obama promising Canada that he was lying to Americans about NAFTA, to talking to terrorist nations unconditionally, to Norman Hsu, to his birth certificate, to Tony Rezco, to his strict anti-second amendment positions, to his admission that his energy policies would raise energy prices on average Americans who can’t afford it, to him claiming that he will bankrupt the coal industry, to his aunt being an illegal alien and his brother living in a ten foot square box in Kenya, to claiming that Americans who don’t want to pay higher taxes are selfish, to his accepting untraceable campaign donations, to Obama threatening television stations that run ads he doesn’t like, to the truth squads, to an Obama founded organization donating money to the communist party, to “redistributing the wealth”, to Biden claiming that if Obama is elected there will be an international crisis, to his ties with ACORN, to …..well the list goes on and on. You get the point.
Meanwhile, once the media turned on Hillary and Bill all bets were off. While none of the above stories were considered noteworthy the media claimed the Clinton’s were racists prompting Bill Clinton, who during his presidency was called the first black president, to defend himself against racism charges. And there was the infamous “right wing hit job” perpetrated on Bill Clinton by the not so right wing Chris Wallace, it was a hit job but it wasn’t right wing.
The Clinton’s were said to be pimping out Chelsea Clinton on the campaign trail. There were stories that the Clinton’s were trying to intimidate voters during primary elections outside polling places. The fix was in.
The media, basking in the glow of the anointed one then turned their venom on the next target, McCain/Palin. John McCain was once a media darling while he was the maverickfucking over George Bush every chance that he got, but then he became the enemy. While the media never reported the Obama birth certificate story they did run stories about McCain not being eligible for the presidency because he was born in the Panama canal. The media ran false stories about McCain and a female staff worker, and I don’t even need to write about the lies that they told about Sarah Palin.
So the media played a huge role in electing the first ever American Idol president with what they covered, how they covered it, and what they didn’t cover. They painted Barack Obama into this mythical figure and the people bought into it. 01/20/09 was an inside job. The Democrat public relations arm otherwise known as the media did a masterful job.
Now the election is over and Barack Obama is president the airwaves are flooded with President Obama keepsakes and mementos. Every day the television is pimping Obama bobble head dolls, watches, coins, tee shirts, thongs, glasses, travel mugs, and for the lady who has everything; the adult toy designed to “put the ‘O’ in Obama.” (Warning: adult material) The Obama love fest rolls on, the campaign for 2012 begins today.
The media is in bed with Obama (pardon the pun if you checked out that last “memento”) and they have been for quite a while. And while that is fine it is a little disheartening to see the way so many people have bought into the hype that the media showered down on this man. As I said before he is the American Idol president. He is more of a rock star than a politician, he more of a Hollywood icon than he is a commander-in-chief. He comes with high expectations because the media raised him up on a pedestal and he can only hope that he lives up to these expectations. If not he has a long way to fall, but the media will be there to catch him and prop him back up so that he can defend his American Idol presidency.
The fix was in, 01/20/09 was an inside job.
America's Watchtower 
He will soon be led from the Oval Office in handcuffs.
In the words of one of THE ONE’S idols “By whatever means neccessary”!
LikeLike
Rock star President. To me, it demeans the office. It is a shame, really. Is this what people really want? The media talks about how bad the economy is, but do we really care? THey also turned the presidency into a reality show. Disgraceful.
LikeLike
Cycles and/or Circles
I have wanted to say this for many years but the ignition to fire just never worked until I found your site through a hotlink in another Blog. These words jumped out of the keyboard after that and I don’t quite know where it is going but I hope it contributes to the debate on hand and to a solution somewhere.
The fortunes, the rise and fall, the good and the bad of Nations, Countries and Dynasties happen in cycles. Sometimes one can pick up the start of a cycle or it’s end quite clearly; at other times one cycle [or a circle] goes into another never ending circle.
Let me handle the latter first and get done with it. Africa has been running in cycles of turmoil and one upheaval after the other. Apart from the Colonial cycle they just never made it, with the exception of old Egypt where they had their moment of glory once and have since stabilized. The rest moves from one circle to the next. Some could have made it but never did; most just never had a chance because they didn’t want it.
Similarly, though not exactly identical, the World knows about other old empires [the Turks had their time, Greece had their moments of glory; there are many, suffices not to have to mention more] but I want to concentrate on what is generally described as Western Civilization. Again though, I want to mention only a very few to limit the actual discussion to America and the United Kingdom.
Almost all “Western Countries and Nations” shared the Colonial Cycle in some way or another, either as the Colony or as the Colonial power. Cycles were almost always cultural or economic [trade] or a combination of the two. It was the two main driving forces for America; the United Kingdom developed out of their Colonial Times and the main difference with America was the right of America to trade independently. Culturally the two nations developed in parallel streams with very little to clash; once the War for American Independence ended [having been a war for trade more than anything else] the two countries developed as natural friends more or less.
They both went through the industrial development cycles, the Wars with France and Germany and the clashes with Communism and remained natural Allies.
Then [I must cut this short for now] 1960 came along and brought in its wake a thing called Liberalism. That in its “founding years” was not a bad thing at all. In fact there is still nothing wrong with the original idea of Liberty; it is when it became mixed up with human rights, technology and politics that it went wrong, to become the monster it is today.
But meantime one must understand Krutchev’s Russia, China, Japan and lately India developed without being affected by Liberalism. It is not something that concerns them much; whatever the humanists may say, these countries are getting stronger. Putin’s Russia is even stronger now that they have adopted capitalism and Japan is on the rise again with China going even faster. All these countries are building their strength in Trade and Technology. Please keep this in mind and that they are also by and large homogenous Nations though one may debate the point whether India is [I will leave that for another day because it suffices for this discussion to call them homogenous, certainly to a much greater degree than America or the United Kingdom].
This is the point where Michael’s concerns about America’s future role triggered in to turn the ignition on for this rambling.
These and the other homogenous Nations of Scandinavia are on the rise while Liberalism as it exists today has dragged America down into a hole from which escape is becoming more difficult every day. The United Kingdom has gone trough the same pain but they are managing it more efficiently [even seems as if they may get out of a never ending circle and actually enter a new cycle of expansion] but America has been loosing her direction.
In comes Obama [remember this is not a doctoral thesis and I am keeping it short] but in comes Obama to redefine homogeny and nationhood at a time when America is struggling to redefine her Identity, at the exact time when the great homogenous Nations I have mentioned are rising.
America’s obsession with Liberal Ideology, and its acceleration by Obama may lead to her doom.
I hate to say this because my heart goes out for the 46% who voted with their heads and hearts in the right place but that is where the decision has to be made.
Communism never got off the ground in America [it eventually also fell in Russia and China for the very same reason] because it was an outdated ideology before it started and Americans just never fancied the idea of Social [commercial or economic] Communism. In fact today even the idea of military Communism is pretty much something to laugh off; when Communism failed economically it also failed for military purposes.
But Liberalism became what some new scholars call Liberanarchism and this is the risk America does not even seem to grasp.
On that I will leave it for today but along with Michael, and adding a bit of my own, with utmost respect for him and my heartfelt abiding love for the 46%, I have to add that America must start to face the fact that it does not any longer occupy the Number One Leadership position in the World, nor can Obama assume He is now the Most Powerful Person in the World. He is not! China and Japan won’t laugh in his face [they do things quietly with stealth and certainty] but the mad Arab and the African tyrant will do the laughing; they are that way inclined.
Forgive me, but I had to say this. The homogenous Nations are on the rise, in economic terms and moral fiber [whether American Liberals squeal about human rights abuses in China or not] [Liberty does mean equality but Liberty eventually goes by the wayside if equality does not go hand in hand with equal responsibility] and these Nations will assume [and share] the Leadership role between them. America is falling apart at the seams; the great cycle has ended. Well, it really ended when Liberalism took over in 1960 but it managed to survive [through two people named Bush and one named Reagan, and one named Nixon] [don’t ever forget the last one] but it has now ended.
Others have fallen too [that is not new] and many have picked themselves up by the bootstraps to rise again. Others who were defeated in War remained unvanquished and fought again and won. Some have fallen through moral decay [someone else once said the Roman Empire sodomised and whored themselves out of an Empire] but I know of no other great Nation, Country or Dynasty who just threw it away for the ego of One Man. It is hard to understand why America wanted to be the first to do it.
LikeLike