Skip to content

President Obama to Adhere to Bush’s Policy on Afghan Prisoners

February 20, 2009

 Today the Justice Department filed a briefing that they would continue President Bush’s policies for dealing with prisoners held in Afghanistan.

In a short legal filing, Justice Department lawyers said they planned to maintain the Bush administration’s claim that the roughly 600 prisoners held in Afghanistan have no right to contest their detention in the courts. “The Government adheres to its previously articulated position,” the attorneys said.

 On matters of the war on terror President Obama seems to be deferring to President Bush’s policies, with the exception of GITMO (which I still feel he will not shut down), and that has to offend the anti-war crowd who expected him to end the war.

Bagram is in a theater of war where the United States is engaged in active hostilities,” so extending those legal rights to the prisoners would be “impracticable,” Justice Department lawyers argued in a brief filed last November. They also argued that the habeas petitions are barred by the Military Commissions Act of 2006, a law Obama vocally opposed.

 President Obama opposed the law back then but he was only candidate Obama at that point, he would say anything to get elected. And he did, and was. By adhering to President Bush’s policies the president is doing the right thing, regardless of the promises he made during the campaign.

 Sure this is yet another broken promise but this is the right call, and I believe that he never intended to do anything other than to carry on with President Bush’s policies in regards to the war. That is why he had so many different opinions during the campaign about ending the war, he always intended to continue Bush’s policies, he just couldn’t admit it.

 How do you people who voted for Obama on the hope that he would end the war feel now? You must feel like you were duped.

 You were.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

7 Comments leave one →
  1. Dominique's avatar
    February 21, 2009 10:58 am

    I have always believed that one a candidate becomes president and gets briefed on “reality” it is a little hard to continue the “anti-war” rhetoric.

    After all, if President Obama did do that and we were attacked again, he would ultimately be held responsible/accountable.

    I would hazard a guess that is not a position he wants to find himself in.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      February 21, 2009 8:51 pm

      True, but it is interesting to see how different the actions are from the rhetoric. This has to be upsetting to the left. 🙂

      Like

  2. Deb's avatar
    Deb permalink
    February 21, 2009 5:49 pm

    That’s very nice. I am glad he is doing the right thing here, but I’m also glad I’m not one of the lefty college students that helped to get Obama elected. Unfortunately in one way or another, he is making suckers out of all of us.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      February 21, 2009 8:53 pm

      Very true, there were so many people that actually voted for him because they thought he would just end the war no questions asked. They have to be shaking their heads right now.

      Like

  3. joe from new hampshire's avatar
    February 22, 2009 8:38 pm

    All those poor dead bastards that voted for that schmuck must be rolling over in their graves! HAHA!! The way I see it, the more promises the asshole breaks, the better off this country is.

    Like

  4. Dominique's avatar
    February 22, 2009 10:40 pm

    I miss your old banner. It was always a comfort to see the tower! 🙂

    Like

Leave a comment