Skip to content

Gay Marriage Bill Passes in The New Hampshire Senate

April 29, 2009

  I wrote just last week about how the New Hampshire Senate Committee voted against recommending the gay marriage bill to the senate by a three to two vote. One of the nay votes in the Senate Committee changed positions so the bill was sent to the senate  and today the senate voted on gay marriage; it passed 13-11.

  Now is where it gets real interesting. There was nobody happier last week, and nobody more disappointed this week, than Governor John Lynch. The governor claims that he is opposed to gay marriage but he has been feeling pressure from a legislature that grows more liberal with every passing election. Governor Lynch was happy last week because the decision on gay marriage was taken out of his hands, but now he will have to make a decision on a tough issue and he doesn’t like to make hard decisions.

  New Hampshire’s civil unions law gives gay couples every single benefit that heterosexual couples have, Governor Lynch signed that legislation and he still believes that it is adequate. But here is his latest statement on gay marriage:

I still believe the fundamental issue is about providing the same rights and protections to same-sex couples as are available to heterosexual couples. This was accomplished through the passage of the civil unions law two years ago. To achieve further real progress, the federal government would need to take action to recognize New Hampshire civil unions.”

  He did not say what he would do when this bill arrives on his desk. He has three options, sign, veto, or ignore the bill. If he chooses to ignore the bill it will become law without his signature.

  During the civil unions debate the governor also refused to say whether he would sign the bill or not before finally signing it. But because this was such a tough issue and as I stated before the governor doesn’t like facing tough issues he signed the bill in secret inviting only a few supporters of the bill as witnesses to avoid protesters before slinking out the back door for the weekend.

  Judging by the way he handled the civil unions bill I am going to predict that the governor will let this legislation become law without his signature. That we he can straddle the fence. It is too politically volatile for him to either sign or veto the bill. He risks losing too many votes no matter what he does. All I ask of him is to show a little courage one way or the other. Take a stand.

  Stay tuned…..

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

7 Comments leave one →
  1. Dominique's avatar
    April 29, 2009 8:52 pm

    Awww man! Geesh. Maybe Lynch will surprise us! Did I just say that?

    Like

  2. Dominique's avatar
    April 29, 2009 10:41 pm

    I thought you might want to take a look at this.

    http://www.aipnews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=4265&posts=3

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      April 30, 2009 5:31 am

      I hadn’t heard anything about that before, that is a little scary. I am going to be looking through that website when I have a chance. Thanks for the link.

      Like

  3. Alfie's avatar
    Alfie permalink
    April 30, 2009 2:30 pm

    Are you starting to think you all look a lot like Massachusetts ? If so say “I do”

    Like

  4. Deb's avatar
    Deb permalink
    May 1, 2009 5:48 pm

    Oh yeah baby! Then NH can have a rockin’ tourism ad, too. Plenty of rainbows for everyone! Why are governors such wimps? Of all the people who (I believe) should have firm views one way or another is the leader of the state. If he thinks it’s OK, he should say so. If not, well, say that too. Huh, the way I see it, if gay people really looked beyond wanting to have everything the same for everyone, they’d realize maybe being “married” may not be the best thing in the entire earth.

    Like

Leave a reply to Mr Pink Eyes Cancel reply