The EPA Did Not Release Report That was Critical of Global Warming

  The EPA recently released a report that gave them the premise to regulate carbon emissions. This same report was used by the House of non-Representatives to pass the government expansion program more widely known as the Cap and Trade legislation last Friday in the middle of the night.

  The EPA report has one teeny, tiny little fault however. The EPA refused to release, in fact they tried to bury, the part of the report that questioned whether man-made global warming was actually occurring. They only released the part of their findings that promoted their agenda, and the all-to-willing liberals in the House of non-Representatives, with the help of eight soon to be Republican ex-nonrepresentatives, were quick to jump on it as a chance to pass their national energy tax.

The EPA did not publicly release a March report that raised questions about the validity of the agency’s conclusions that carbon emissions are a cause of global warming and a danger to human health

  The EPA was in a hurry to support President Obama’s fringe, radical global warming agenda so they ignored the part of the study that was contrary to the president’s agenda.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute obtained and released a draft of the dissenting document last week, along with internal correspondence CEI says proves the report “was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the Administration’s agenda of regulating carbon dioxide.”

  The EPA refused to listen to, or just decided to ignore,  the FACT that the weather runs in cycles:

The TSD glosses over long-term cyclical variations in ocean temperature, similar to El Nino, which “are by far the best single explanation for global temperature fluctuations,” says the report.
 
The Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation are such variations, and occur in roughly 60-year cycles, as opposed to the 3-5 year El Nino cycle. Their role is “not really explained in the draft TSD,” the report says. “(A)t the very least, there needs to be an explanation as to why (EPA) believes that these evident cycles do not exist or why they are much more unimportant than we believe them to be.”

  The EPA also decided to ignore the roll that sun spots play:

The TSD neglects to explore the “strong association between solar sunspots/irradiance and global temperature fluctuations.” It dismissed solar variations based on data obtained by a U.N. climate panel, but the veracity of that data has since been called into question. New research “suggests that solar variability could account for up to 68 percent of the increase in Earth’s global temperatures

  Almost seventy percent of the earth’s warming (if there is indeed warming, which I don’t believe there is) is due to sunspots but the EPA decided that information was not valid. It didn’t fit the agenda.

  The EPA also ignored my position that the earth is not warming in the first place:

The TSD’s assumption that greenhouse gases have triggered global warming is hard to verify, because “changes in (greenhouse gas) concentrations appear to have so little effect that it is difficult to find any effect in the satellite temperature record, which started in 1978.”

  And the EPA ignored the little fact that the earth has actually cooled over the last decade:

Global temperatures have declined for 11 straight years, and at the same time, “atmospheric CO2 levels have continued to increase and CO2 emissions have accelerated

  All of this information was left out of the EPA’s report to further their radical agenda and I would find it funny if it wasn’t for the fact that the House of non-Representatives used this very flawed and incomplete report as their basis for the need to pass global warming legislation.

  The EPA cherry picked the information that they found valuable for their ultimate goal of regulating “greenhouse gasses” and they cherry picked the information that would advance President Obama’s agenda item to impose a national energy tax on every America.

  The EPA is happy, they grabbed more power. The president is happy, he is in the process of grabbing more power. The American people should not be happy, if we use more power (electricity) we will pay for it dearly through taxes that are supposed to be for our own good.

  What does this say about the truth about global warming when anything that runs contrary to the “theory” of global warming must be buried? But more importantly, what does this say about our politicians in Washington if they are willing to use incomplete reports to come to the conclusion that the American people must be regulated to solve a problem that the buried portions of the report say doesn’t exist?

  The EPA has its agenda, the president has his agenda, and the House of non-Representatives have their agenda and if that means covering up portions of a report that runs contrary to the agendas, so be it.

  So much for President Obama’s pledge of transparency in government, huh? The one thing that is becoming more and more transparent to me is the fact that the American people are getting screwed.