Global Warming, Global Taxes, and Global Governance– a Move Toward Global Socialism

  We can see in this article that much of what I have been saying about the true goals of the global warming hoax is true.  Before I get to that however, this is a quote that I find interesting from the article:

President Obama has pushed for the passage of the bill in the Senate and attended a G8 summit this week where he agreed to attempt to keep the Earth’s temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees C.

  When you hear it put in those terms you realize how insane these people really are. Do they really think that the earth’s temperature can be controlled? Does anybody really believe this is possible? How narcissistic does a person have to be to believe that ANY person, or group of people, can control the temperature of the earth?

  Anyway, back to exposing the true goals of global warming. Taxes and control, and the socialization of the world economy.

    At  recent UN global warming conferences calls for a new “global carbon tax” have been talked about.

In addition, calls for a global carbon tax have been urged at recent UN global warming conferences. In December 2007, the UN climate conference in Bali, urged the adoption of a global carbon tax that would represent “a global burden sharing system, fair, with solidarity, and legally binding to all nations.”

“Finally someone will pay for these [climate related] costs,” Othmar Schwank, a global tax advocate, said at the 2007 UN conference after a panel titled “A Global CO2 Tax.”

 A tax that will be “legally binding to all nations” which of course means all citizens. Everybody will be subject to this new tax.

 Which leads us into the other goal of the global warming scam, global socialization:

Schwank noted that wealthy nations like the U.S. would bear the biggest burden based on the “polluters pay principle.” The U.S. and other wealthy nations need to “contribute significantly more to this global fund,” Schwank explained.

  Wealthy nations would contribute more than non-wealthy nations, I think it is safe to assume that the wealthy nation most in question here is the United States. Now correct me if I am wrong, and I am sure somebody will, but is it not true that the wealthiest nations already have the toughest environmental restrictions and standards already in place while the under-developed nations have less restrictions in place? If this is true why is it that the nations that need to pay more are the wealthy nations and not the nations that are actually polluting the air at a higher rate?

  The answer, which we will see in the next quote, is that this is all about an implementation of global socialistic  system. It has nothing to do with pollution, or the environment, and everything to do with “redistributing the wealth.”

The environmental group Friends of the Earth advocated the transfer of money from rich to poor nations during the 2007 UN climate conference.

“A climate change response must have at its heart a redistribution of wealth and resources,” said Emma Brindal, a climate justice campaigner coordinator for Friends of the Earth.

  That last statement is everything that you need to know about the true agenda of the global warming advocates. But in case you need a little more convincing. here is a quote from Al Gore on the recently passed climate change bill:

But it is the awareness itself that will drive the change and one of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance

  What more needs to be said?