Skip to content

Democrats Try to Delegitimize Healthcare Reform Protesters

August 6, 2009

  Members of congress have returned home and they are facing angry constituents. Between protesters at town hall meetings and telephone calls and emails US representatives are getting an earful.

  Are they going to listen to us? That remains to be seen, so far top Democrats are trying to trivialize us. Instead of listening to the protesters they are downplaying us. Much like they scoffed at the Tea Party protests and called the protesters nothing but fringe radicals and racists, they are doing the same when it comes to healthcare reform.

  Harry Reid said:

These are nothing more than destructive efforts to interrupt a debate that we should have, and are having,” Reid said. “They are doing this because they don’t have any better ideas. They have no interest in letting the negotiators, even though few in number, negotiate. It’s really simple: they’re taking their cues from talk show hosts, Internet rumor-mongerers … and insurance rackets

  First he says that we are trying to have a debate and then he goes on to say the reason we are protesting is because we don’t have any ideas. Which is it Harry? We are trying to debate and show you that we do not agree with you. You say we are having a debate yet you ridicule those on the other side of the debate, that sounds more like Chicago thug politics than political debate to me. If you were honest you would listen to your critics’ point of view, not minimalize their opinions.

  Nancy Pelosi said that protesters are carrying swastikas yet offered no proof, slanderous accusations in order to hide from the debate.

  Barbara Boxer said that all we are trying to do is hurt the president.

  Other Democrats are complaining that those who ask critical questions at these town meetings are nothing more than GOP plants and do not represent an independent position. They claim that these protests are false and that they are orchestrated events.

  There is probably some GOP involvement here but even if there is, so what? There is definitely some organization here, so what? Since when did it become wrong to organize  opposition to legislation in order to be heard? This is part of the American system. What was Code Pink if it wasn’t a politically organized protest group of the left. This is nothing more than that except that these protests are coming from the right. While Code Pink was held to almost godlike status the same type of behavior from the right is seen as counterproductive and destructive. The double standard is in full display here.  

  I happen to find it encouraging that the right is finally starting to organize, mobilize, and vocalize in the name of issues that are important to us. We have been silent too long and it is about time that we wake up.

  The Tea Parties were only the beginning, we are now energized and we will remain energized until the 2010 elections. The left is trying to delegitimize us because they fear us, they know that we are a potential problem in the next election. So instead of debating us and instead of listening to us they are trying to make a mockery of us. But it will not work. We will prove to them next year that we are not going away.

  Secretly they know this that is why they are trying to do damage to us. The damage will be done, but is us who will do the damage in toe 2010 election. They will listen to us then, they will have no choice.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

10 Comments leave one →
  1. m's avatar
    August 6, 2009 11:05 pm

    If you’d like to prove Harry Reid wrong, you might try actually saying something specific and relevant about health care. You haven’t said anything here, and so you’ve (once again) missed an opportunity.

    I understand that you think you’re a social movement. There is always an uncomfortable similarity between a protesting body and an angry mob, and I agree with you that almost no protesting body is entirely “pure” of outside influence.

    So how can we tell the difference? Well, a legitimate political body speaks constantly about expanding access and democratic possibilities for all people. It does NOT, for example, demand that nothing change and that existing inequalities (like access to health-care) continue unchanged. It’s interests do NOT line up with the interests of huge corporations. It does NOT seek to shut down the democratic discussions available at open, public forums.

    So maybe you can make an argument that social inequalities are justified. Maybe you really think the dangers of (unchecked and undemocratic) corporate power are less than the dangers of a (democratically elected) larger government. That’s fine. But please at least be honest about it.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      August 7, 2009 7:42 pm

      This post was not meant to debate healthcare reform, that is why I didn’t write about healthcare reform. This was a post designed to show the way people who oppose healthcare reform are being treated, a different angle to the same debate.

      Like

  2. Randy Allgaier's avatar
    August 6, 2009 11:38 pm

    You might be interested in my take on these vile protests-

    Town Hall Astroturf Protests and the “Birthers”: The ugliness of racism and hatred

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      August 7, 2009 7:44 pm

      Typical “if you oppose Obama you are a racist” take on the issue. It is all to convenient to call people who oppose Obama racists, I don’t even get upset about it any more because it happens so often. I have growm numb to this criticism.

      Like

  3. Ron Russell's avatar
    August 7, 2009 4:40 pm

    Those in the Obama administration have turned loose the union thugs on those attending the various townhall events. They have in affect opened Pandora’s Box and will not be able to control the onrushing events and violence will occur. The MSM will try to play down these events, but in the end the truth will emerge dispite the liberal spin by the media. Obama’s numbers will tumble as the American public sees real thugs in action Chicago style.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      August 7, 2009 7:45 pm

      I have heard about this, it seems as if Chicago thug politics has made it on a national level now.

      Like

  4. Deb's avatar
    Deb permalink
    August 7, 2009 5:03 pm

    How DARE anyone disagree with president Obama! Must be fake. COME ON. THe absolute definition of hypocricy. I read a letter sent in to the opinion page of a local newspaper that was titled Bush, Cheney the real dictators. After the woman ripped them both for 5 paragraphs, the next one began– Let’s stop all the name calling and negative thinking… WHAT??? I said “astro turf” anger because I thought it was funny. The Libs^ are serious. I hope Randy does not ever get old and sick. Good luck getting treatment.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      August 7, 2009 7:47 pm

      They reaaly do seem to believe that the only people who could possibly oppose Obama must be people who are being paid by higher-ups to disagree with him. But he is beginning to lose support all across the board, they could be in for a big surprise next year.

      Like

  5. rjjrdq's avatar
    August 7, 2009 8:27 pm

    Looks like some ” union thugs” have found your blog. The trolls are out. See how “m” tried to define your position for you? Yep, you’re on the list.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      August 8, 2009 7:17 am

      M definately tried to change the argument that I was making. It wasn’t about helathcare but about portrayal in the media of those who protest. Typical bait and switch.

      Like

Leave a reply to rjjrdq Cancel reply