Skip to content

Massachusetts senate race tightens up– a referendum on healthcare?

January 12, 2010

My computer is still down, this is a mobile post, please excuse any formatting problems that may exist.

The race between Democrat Martha Coakley and Republican Scott Brown for “the people’s” senate seat that was vacated by the death of Ted Kennedy is tightening up. Just days ago, Coakley held a large lead in the polls but Scott Brown has narrowed the gap considerably and one poll even shows him in the lead.

This is remarkable, not only because it is happening in Massachusetts but also because up until now Brown has done it with little national money while Coakley enjoys the endorsements of many of the major unions.

Coakley has gone from cocky and arrogant– she wasn’t even campaigning until the polls tightened– to nervous. And she should be– but so should the other Democrats in Washington– there is voter discontent out there and if Brown could somehow pull off this major upset, all Democrats in Washington will be put on notice. They could be next. While Republicans have done well recently– most notably in Virginia and New Jersey– a win by Scott Brown in Massachusetts would dwarf all of the other Republican gains combined.

While the RNC has largely ignored this race because Michael Steele probably thought it wasn’t worth the effort in Massachusetts– that the election of Coakley was a mere formality– the fact is, not only is it worth the effort, it is critical. Michael Steele has miscalculated the voter discontent that is being felt even in Massachusetts and he has ignored a race that could stop the healthcare reform bill in its tracks. But Americans have not miscalculated and money is beginning to flow in to Scott Brown– over $1 million in contributions have come in in the last week. Not a moment too soon either, Scott Brown was almost out of money.

Democrats are also getting nervous and trotted out Ted Kennedy’s widow and family to a special press conference to announce their endorsement of Coakley, which was something they were hesitant to do when her election seemed like a walk in the park. They were prepared to remain non-commital until the polls started falling, before succumbing to party pressure and begrudgingly throwing their support behind Coakley.

This race is now beginning to attract national attention because of the consequences it could have on the president’s healthcare reform bill. If Coakley wins this election there will be no stopping this bill in one form or another. However, if Brown wins this election, the healthcare bill is dead the moment he is sworn in.

I think that this is the biggest reason why the race is tightening. The more people learn about the healthcare reform bill, the more they do not like it. This could be the sole reason why Scott Brown wins this election if he pulls it off. Massachusetts residents have first hand experience with mandated healthcare and they know what a disaster it has become.

Voters of Massachusetts: the eyes of the nation are upon you. Do what is right and send Scott Brown to the senate. Don’t let Barack Obama do to the country what Mitt Romney did to you.

10 Comments leave one →
  1. MB's avatar
    January 12, 2010 4:49 pm

    Let’s not forget Joe Kennedy in this race. He’s the only candidate who actually took unpaid leave to compaign to further prove his point that he is the only candidate that, if elected, would reduce taxes AND spending. My sense is, that THAT is the right thing for MA voters to do. Won’t happen though.

    Like

  2. Brandon's avatar
    Brandon permalink
    January 12, 2010 6:42 pm

    It would be great for this state and our country if Mr. Brown wins the senate seat, but I think even if he does it will be hard to kill the Healthcare bill with the dems in Washington pulling strings to ensure it passes before he gets sworn in. Im not sure that he came off moderate enough at the debate to win the majority of undecided liberal voters, but I think he will appeal more in the next one and it should be a close vote. As mentioned above, Joe Kennedy made a lot of excellent points during the debate and though he wont likely get too many votes, i’m happy a third party is being heard. That said, I dont think he would make a good senator, but Coakley could be disastrous. Allowing foreign terrorists to present a case in civilian court is absolutely absurd.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      January 13, 2010 5:39 am

      There are rumors that the Democrats will delay swearing in Brown until it is too late for him to oppose the healthcare bill. If that happens it will have huge repercussions in November, the people will see that for what it is and will not put up with it.

      Like

  3. Dominique's avatar
    January 12, 2010 8:33 pm

    Oh I hope Brown takes it. We need a major shake up and this would do it. If millions marching on Washington was enough for them to hear us now, maybe an upset by Brown will make them hear us now!

    Like

  4. Rick's avatar
    Rick permalink
    January 12, 2010 9:14 pm

    Voters of Massachusetts: the eyes of the nation are upon you. Do what is right and send Scott Brown to the senate. Don’t let Barack Obama do to the country what Mitt Romney did to you.

    From your pen to Gods ears

    Like

  5. rjjrdq's avatar
    January 12, 2010 9:59 pm

    What is up with the GOP? They ignored Doug Hoffman and he gets knocked out of a fraudulent election in New York. Now, with yet another senate seat in reach, they again watch another opportunity going by. Steele has to go. He’s no leader. He’s not the only one either. he’s just the current face of the GOP. Unbelievable.

    Like

  6. Matt's avatar
    January 12, 2010 11:27 pm

    People need to support this guy. The SEIU, and reportedly, ACORN, are out in full force. We have to be on the lookout for all out election theft.

    I agree that this is another sign of Steele’s irrelevance. He needs to go NOW so someone with a pair can lead the GOP.

    Like

  7. Steve Dennis's avatar
    January 13, 2010 5:43 am

    If Brown were to win it would definitely tell Washington that we are not going away. Coakley has now been slamming the tea party voters, but they are the ones who we know are going to turn out next Tuesday, that doesn’t seem to smart. But it should tell the voters how she really feels about them. She honestly thinks that she is entitled to the “people’s seat.”

    Like

  8. Robert T's avatar
    Robert T permalink
    January 13, 2010 8:50 am

    The recent debate around how to best control health insurance and the cost, has pushed the issue of prevention to the front. Why is prevention so important? It is important because the average person is overweight and running up the medial cost. If you look at the generations before us they were in much better shape and took care of themselves. Studies has shown that a person who is in good shape and has health Insurance Medical does not cost the government a lot of money. For those who do not cost the government more. Who is responsible?

    Like

Leave a reply to Dominique Cancel reply