Skip to content

Three House Democrats move to block EPA from regulating carbon emissions

February 9, 2010

  The EPA recently ruled that greenhouse gases caused by humans were such a danger to the public health that they had the right to regulate these emissions without congress enacting any new laws.

  With Barack Obama’s cap and trade legislation in peril, it seems as though the EPA is poised to move forward with Obama’s vision without there being anything that we can do about it. It looks as if we are going to get cap and trade regulations passed one way or the other. Either Barack Obama will push a cap and trade  bill through congress, or the EPA will enact what amounts to a cap and trade bill through regulations.

  Or will they?

 Three House Democrats are not happy about the EPA’s recent finding and are introducing legislation that would stop the EPA from regulating carbon emissions without the approval of congress.

    This sounds good and it is certainly a step in the right direction, but we must remember that these three Democrats are not against cap and trade legislation, they just don’t want the EPA to enact it– they want to do that themselves. The good news is that if this legislation passes it will put the responsibility of cap and trade legislation back where it belongs, with our elected officials instead of with the unelected EPA. This will give us the chance to vote out of office all of those who are all too willing to go along with the climate change hoax.

  The issue these three Democrats have with the EPA’s ruling is that they believe the EPA has overstepped the authority that it was granted in the Clean Air Act– the Clean Air Act was not designed to combat global warming. They are now looking to stop the EPA from using the power that it has granted itself.

  And it turns out that these three House Democrats are not alone; 35 Senate Republicans have also co-sponsored a bill that offered a “disapproval resolution” on the way the EPA is handling this issue. Three Democrats– and their names may surprise you– have signed onto this bill as well. Blanche Lincoln, Ben Nelson, and Mary Landrieu are the three Democrats. These three Democrats are considered vulnerable in the upcoming elections and suddenly they are ready to side with the Republicans on the issue of cap and trade. While in all likelihood nothing is going to come of this legislation, there is a chance that during an election year this could gain some traction.

  I just wonder, if this is happening because of the Climategate scandal. Does Climategate have some of these politicians rethinking their position on global warming, at least privately? Or are they just upset at the EPA for taking away some of their power? Either way, I hope that this legislation moves forward, so we can hold elected officials responsible if they ever do pass Barack Obama’s cap and trade bill. If the EPA does it, we will never be able to hold them accountable.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

8 Comments leave one →
  1. Dominique's avatar
    February 9, 2010 12:30 pm

    I so hope the climate scandal IS causing people to step back and take a moment to THINK.

    I would think our weather might be doing the same. For a world in the midst of a global warming, mother nature is not helping!

    I can not wait until we get these people out of office.

    I just got an email from Sarah Palin. Did you know that,

    “Thirty-seven Governorships, one third of the United States Senate, and the entire House of Representatives is up for election.”

    That is some serious damage we could do if we win most of these seats! Holy cow this is going to be an interesting year!

    Like

  2. Rick's avatar
    Rick permalink
    February 9, 2010 2:56 pm

    Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) and Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.):
    We propose to introduce a bill that will amend the Clean Air Act to exclude basing regulations on global warming effects.

    EPA:
    That’s fine we will impose regulations based on our own brain farts not Global warming or the effects of Global Warming or even climate change.

    Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D-N.D.):
    The Hell you say, I will propose a bill that will keep the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases at all unless approved by Congress.

    Congress:
    APPROVED!…No wait Disapproved…No wait APPROVED

    Like

  3. Ron Russell's avatar
    February 9, 2010 4:18 pm

    This sounds like a good move, but does anyone think that if this should pass both the House and Senate that Obama would sign such a bill! The answer is no! I think we are stuck with the EPA’s regulation unless the federal courts step in at some point.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      February 10, 2010 9:29 pm

      Good point, Obama wants this type of regulation and he doesn’t care if it is the government or the EPA who enforces it. As a matter of fact he probably would rather have the EPA regulate carbon emissions because there would be not voting on it in congress.

      Like

  4. Matt's avatar
    February 9, 2010 11:35 pm

    I’m thinking that perhaps three Dems are trying to avoid getting fired in October. ClimateGate might have a role, but only in that the public is more aware of the situation-NOT that the Dems want to do the right thing. It might be a game of sorts. We’ll have to watch it and see where it goes.

    Like

  5. rjjrdq's avatar
    February 10, 2010 2:30 am

    Catch-22. ‘We’ll block the EPA only if we can have more power than we already do. ‘

    Like

Leave a reply to rjjrdq Cancel reply