Climategate: IPCC admits sea level flaw in Netherlands data
As if it wasn’t bad enough for the IPCC with the news of the Climategate scandal which revealed scientists were intentionally hiding data that would have disproved the global warming scam, and the news that the Himalayan glaciers are not melting as they claimed, and the news that the data from China on rising temperatures was flawed, there is yet another controversy surrounding the IPCC: we have now learned that the IPCC’s data on the rising seal levels in the Netherlands is also flawed.
The IPCC claimed that 55% of the Netherlands was under seal level but that is not true. The IPCC tried to “adjust” the report once the error was revealed to state that 55% of the Netherlands is either under sea level or susceptible to flooding. But there is still one problem with that statement; it isn’t true either. It turns out that only 26% of the country is under seal level and only 29% of the country is susceptible to flooding.
The more that we learn about the IPCC and their data, the more we realize that this organization is either inept and cannot accurately gather and assess data, or they are purposely manipulating the data in an effort to push their agenda forward and heighten the people’s sense of crisis.
Which is worse?
If the evidence is as “overwhelming” as the president claims it is, why would the IPCC have to manipulate the data? Or if this was an unintentional error– along with all the other errors we have learned about– isn’t it time to investigate this organization before we commit billions of dollars to an issue that has so many inept people working in it? The evidence doesn’t seem so overwhelming when you take into account the fact that the IPCC is admitting all of these errors.
I asked, which is worse, the deliberate manipulating of data to reach a certain goal, or the IPCC having such incompetence in the organization that they are constantly making this type of mistake? In the end I don’t think it matters, we are all going to pay for this, and the bottom line is that the data is flawed– intentionally or unintentionally– and we can’t risk spending this type of money when the very legitimacy of climate change is now in question. It is time to begin investigating the IPCC.
America's Watchtower 
The more that is revealed, the more I have to question the IPCC and their ultimate goal. So much of their data has been flawed and flat out falsified, it should give everyone great pause to wonder what they are up to.
LikeLike
Very true Larry, this is all about keeping the global warming money flowing. There is too much money at stake for these people to disprove global warming. Without global warming there will be no money, these people realize it and are making sure that the truth is never found out. Even if it means fudging some numbers and throwing away data.
LikeLike
So with so much of the data now being proved false, you would think all the Gore-ites would distance themselves.
I read an article this week that said the reason ‘global warming’ and ‘cap and trade’ continue forward is because many huge corporations have millions and millions of stock holders money tied up in it. THAT is a scary thought in more ways than one.
LikeLike
That really is a scary thought! This whole issue is all about the money, there are millions, if not billions, of dollars at stake here.
LikeLike
As this continue to unfold, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the Goracle seems to be in hiding. At which of his mansions is he staying? Is his private jet in the hangar?
LikeLike
Where, oh where, has Al Gore gone? Where, oh where, can he be?
LikeLike
It seems quite clear to me that the numbers have be fudged in order to get the desired result. The scientific method has been tossed aside in favor of pleasing those who provide the funds necessary for research. These modern day patrons of science are controlling the scientist just as the patrons of old had a big say in what the artist produced. Remember the old Bible saying, “If one serves two masters then…………”.
LikeLike
It is a big circle, isn’t it? The scientists need the funds, but if they disprove global warming they will not get the funds. So they keep up this myth so that the money will keep coming in. Everyone is happy this way, except us.
LikeLike