Climategate: IPCC withdraws claims on rising sea levels

  Here we have yet another example of the IPCC using faulty data to predict the effects of global warming. In this case the IPCC has withdrawn its prediction of rising sea levels, claiming that the data used from a journal that they used to confirm their predictions of the rising sea levels was incomplete and should be discarded.

  Some “scientists” have claimed that the IPCC’s estimates of rising seal levels has actually not gone far enough and believe that the sea levels will rise even faster than the IPCC has predicted, while other scientists believe that the sea levels aren’t rising nearly as fast as stated, if at all. The IPCC has declined to state to the public whether the sea level estimates that they have been predicting are too high or too low based on this data, admitting only that the data is incomplete.

  I would guess, based on the alarmism that is the global warming movement, that the sea level estimates are much too high, not too low. Here is my reasoning: If the IPCC estimates were too low and the sea levels were rising faster than they predicted, they would not simply withdraw this data so that more research could be done. They would release this information to the public to refute all of the Climategate scandals that have arisen in the past few weeks in order to push forward their agenda and keep it alive and credible. They would tell the world either directly, or they would let this data leak out, that the sea levels were rising faster than predicted and would claim that more strict action was needed right away, delay would be catastrophic. They would claim that in light of the new evidence there would be no time to delay acting against the rising sea levels.

  But they are not doing that. They are admitting that the data was incomplete and are simply withdrawing the evidence of sea level increases, claiming that more study needs to be done. This lack of urgency on the IPCC’s part to take further action, and to simply remove the faulty data in the guise of doing more research, is proof to me that they have overstated their prediction on the rising sea levels.

  That is what I believe the incomplete data shows;  much like the IPCC was forced to admit that the Himalayan glaciers aren’t melting nearly as fast as they claimed– the sea levels aren’t rising nearly as fast as claimed and so they will remove this data quietly and tell the people more research needs to be done. We have already seen how they conduct research, Climategate has taught us that the IPCC reached its conclusion first and they blatantly tried to manipulate the data to confirm their conclusion. Now they expect us to trust them to do more studying on the rising sea levels? On data that they now admit was faulty also. I don’t think so.

  The global warming argument is falling apart all around them and people are beginning to realize that the global warming alarmists, and their research, cannot be trusted.