Skip to content

New details emerge about Barack Obama’s alleged involvement in the Rod Blagojevich scandal

April 23, 2010

  Yesterday I wrote about the intent of Rod Blagojevich’s defense team to subpoena Barack Obama. Rod Blagojevich was indicted for trying to sell the senate seat that was vacated when Barack Obama became president. Rod Blagojevich has always claimed that he was in contact with an agent who claimed to representing Barack Obama’s interest in filling his previously held seat, while Barack Obama has denied any such involvement in the scandal. 

  Today, we have learned some details of what Rod Blogojevich is claiming. Below is a list of what Barack Obama is being accused of: 

 

1. Obama may have lied about conversations with convicted fraudster Tony Rezko 

Blagojevich’s lawyers allege that Rezko admitted breaking the law by contributing “a large sum of cash” to a public official. Blagojevich’s attorneys say that public official is Obama. Obama said that Rezko never relayed a request from a lobbyist to hold a fundraiser in favor of favorable legislative action. But the point may be moot: regardless of Obama talking/not talking to Rezko, Blagojevich’s attorneys say that Obama refused the request regardless. 

Redacted portion: However, the defense has a good faith belief that Mr. Rezko, President Obama’s former friend, fund-raiser, and neighbor told the FBI and the United States Attorneys a different story about President Obama. In a recent in camera proceeding, the
government tendered a three paragraph letter indicating that Rezko “has stated in interviews with the government that he engaged in election law violations by personally contributing a large sum of cash to the campaign of a public official who is not Rod Blagojevich. … Further, the public official denies being aware of cash contributions to his campaign by Rezko or others and denies having
conversations with Rezko related to cash contributions. … Rezko has also stated in interviews with the government that he believed he transmitted a quid pro quo offer from a lobbyist to the public official, whereby the lobbyist would hold a fundraiser for the official in exchange for favorable official action, but that the public official rejected the offer. The public official denies any such conversation. In addition, Rezko has stated to the government that he and the public official had certain conversations about gaming legislation and administration, which the public official denies having had. 

Redacted footnote: The defense has a good faith belief that this public official is Barack Obama. 

2. Obama may have overtly recommended Valerie Jarret for his Senate seat
Blagojevich’s defense team basically alleges that Obama told a certain labor union official that he (Obama) would support Valerie Jarrett’s candidacy for the Senate seat. Jarrett, referred to as “Senate Candidate B”, is now a senior advisor to the president. 

Redacted portion: Yet, despite President Obama stating that no representatives of his had any part of any deals, labor union president told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to labor union official on November 3, 2008 who received a phone message from Obama that evening. After labor union official listened to the message labor union official told labor union president “I’m the one”. Labor union president took that to mean that labor union official was to be the one to deliver the message on behalf of Obama that Senate Candidate B was his pick. (Labor union president 302, February 2, 2009, p. 7). 

Labor union official told the FBI and the United States Attorneys “Obama expressed his belief that [Senate Candidate B] would be a good Senator for the people of Illinois and would be a candidate who could win re-election. [Labor union official] advised Obama that [labor union official] would reach out to Governor Blagojevich and advocate for [Senate Candidate B] … [Labor union official] called [labor union president] and told [labor union president] that Obama was aware that [labor union official] would be reaching out to Blagojevich.” (Labor union official 302, February 3, 2009 p. 3). 

3. A supporter of President Obama may have offered quid pro quo on a Jarrett senate appointment
Redacted portion: Supporter of Presidential Candidate Obama is mentioned in a phone call on November 3, 2008, having offered “fundraising” in exchange for Senate Candidate B for senator (Blagojevich Home Phone Call # 149). 

4. Obama maintained a list of good Senate candidates
Redacted portion: President-elect Obama also suggested Senate Candidate A to Governor Blagojevich. John Harris told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to President’s Chief of Staff on November 12, 2008. Harris took notes of the conversation and wrote that President’s Chief had previously worked as Blagojevich’s press secretary. Obama agreed of Staff told Harris that Senate Candidate A was acceptable to Obama as a senate pick. (Harris handwritten notes, OOG1004463) President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that “he could not say where but somewhere it was communicated to him that” Senate Candidate A was a suggested candidate viewed as one of the four “right” candidates “by the Obama transition team.”

5. Rahm Emanuel allegedly floated Cheryl Jackson’s name for the Senate seat
Redacted portion: President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that he had a conversation discussing the Senate seat with Obama on December 7, 2008 in Obama’s car. President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI “Obama expressed concern about Senate Candidate D being appointed as Senator. 

[President’s Chief of Staff] suggested they might need an expanded list to possibly include names of African Americans that came out of the business world. [President’s Chief of Staff] thought he suggested Senate Candidate E who was the head of the Urban League and with President’s Chief of Staff’s suggestion. 

6. Obama had a secret phone call with Blagojevich
Redacted portion: President-elect Obama also spoke to Governor Blagojevich on December 1, 2008 in Philadelphia. On Harris Cell Phone Call # 139, John Harris and Governor’s legal counsel discuss a conversation Blagojevich had with President-elect Obama. The government claims a conspiracy existed from October 22, 2008 continuing through December 9, 2008.6 That conversation is relevant to the defense of the government’s theory of an ongoing conspiracy. Only Rod Blagojevich and President Obama can testify to the contents of that conversation. The defense is allowed to present evidence that corroborates the defendant’s testimony. 

  These are some serious charges and I do not believe that Rod Blagojevich would make them lightly. There has to be something to this or he would never risk putting Barack Obama on the stand. Someone is lying in this scandal and while Rod Blagojevich may be a despicable person for attempting to sell a senate seat, if it is proven that Barack Obama was involved in this game, he is equally despicable. 

  We need to know if the president was involved in such underhanded politics as is being claimed. If Rod Blagojevich is lying than he needs to face further charges for libeling a sitting president of the United States, but if he is telling the truth, Barack Obama is involved in a major scandal. A scandal that will make Scooter Libby look like an altar boy. 

  This information was supposed to be redacted, but it wasn’t done well enough and the details of the subpoena have come to light. My only fear here is that Barack Obama’s lawyers will be able to stop him from testifying based on this fact.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

14 Comments leave one →
  1. TexasFred's avatar
    April 23, 2010 9:39 pm

    I personally can’t stand Blago.. But wouldn’t he be a lovable little twit if he, quite unintentionally, brought the house down on Obama?? 😛

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      April 24, 2010 7:59 am

      I can’t stand him either, but if her were to bring down Obama, I could learn to like him.

      Like

      • Deb's avatar
        Deb permalink
        April 24, 2010 2:57 pm

        I like him already, the Elvis impersonation aside. All those “may have” statements, (and I KNOW I am biased) well, I believe they could very well be true. Why would someone so slimy and seemingly weak pull all of this crud on his own? That is what I find difficult to believe.

        Like

  2. Ron Russell's avatar
    April 23, 2010 10:49 pm

    I’ve often thought Obama’s House was a “house of cards” and if a weak link should break the whole damn thing will come crumbling down on him. One can hope that something comes of this.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      April 24, 2010 8:00 am

      We shall see if anything comes of this.There are some serious charges here and I don’t think that Blago would have made them without proof, but then again, you just never know.

      Like

  3. Matt's avatar
    April 23, 2010 11:14 pm

    It would be ironic if a complete slime ball like Blago could bring down this Presidency. Then again, who would investigate the POTUS? Who would call him on this. Because, you gotta know that he’ll deny everything, and the MSM and everyone else on the left will rally around him.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      April 24, 2010 8:01 am

      Two peas in a pod,in my opinion. This won’t be covered they way it should be, but if Obama soes actually take the stand can they possibly ignore it?

      Like

  4. Dominique's avatar
    April 24, 2010 12:45 am

    The interesting thing for me today in my reading is that Blogojevich isn’t the only one that the FBI have as witnesses.

    It makes me wonder if this might be what brings Obama down. If not, it definitely reveals how his “house” is build on a shaky deck of cards and can implode at any moment.

    I have no doubt that there are many Blogojevich’s that Obama used and tossed aside.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      April 24, 2010 8:02 am

      This is going to be interesting, I think there is a major story bubbling just below the surface here and it could be ready to explode if this moves forward. And you are right, there are probably others that Barack Obama stepped on while he was rising, perhaps they will soon be ready to pile on as well.

      Like

  5. Reaganite Republican's avatar
  6. Rick's avatar
    Rick permalink
    April 24, 2010 9:12 am

    The Obama administration is despicable already. We don’t need to see he was strong-arming one of the more disliked solders in the chicago Mobster style political machine to know that.
    If a sitting President can lie under oath in a sexual harassment case and be the center of a sexual scandal in the White house and still, the MSM along with much of the Public refuse to condemn the action then this instance will be nothing other then another troubling stench in the air around Obama.
    Libby was a trumped up charge by the lefty hound dogs in the MSM and Borg lawyers bent on splitting hairs in order to apply their double standards. Turn the tables and you wouldn’t hear a peep. Kind of like the Burger papers down the paints by accident thingy.
    This Guy and his handlers are too smart for something this dumb to screw up their plans.
    We wont be seeing Obama even close to a mic waging his finger to a gullible public saying
    “I did not have a phone call with this scumbag”
    How dare you even imply such a question…. No we should be thanking him

    Like

  7. Reaganite Republican's avatar
    April 24, 2010 9:44 am

    This must-read post linked at the Reaganite Republican… nice work:

    http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2010/04/please-allow-us-to-retort.html

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. Blagojevich and Obama « Interned In Northfield

Leave a reply to Steve Dennis Cancel reply