Skip to content

Arizona immigration law protest in Boston? What a bust!

July 11, 2010

  On Saturday my family was in Boston to check my son into a Summer music program at Berklee. I knew that the governors– including Jan Brewer– were in town, and I knew that a protest against Arizona’s new controversial immigration law was also scheduled for that day. But I did not know where the protest would take place and I did not know the time that the protest was scheduled to take place.

  As we entered the Performance Center at Berklee for the orientation it was hot and humid with a few clouds in the sky, but when the orientation was over about an hour and a half later we were met with heavy rains. Being unprepared for the rain, we quickly rushed down Boylston Street and took shelter in a bar and grill where we decided to have a parting lunch with our oldest son– and straight into the protest march route.

  As we were eating our lunch I looked out the window when I heard a little commotion and right outside the window I saw the protesters march by carrying signs and ducking in the heavy rain. They were surrounded on both sides be people wearing tactical gear. I couldn’t tell whether these were actual guards protecting the protesters, or whether they were protesters dressed up in tactical gear. I think they were protesters (or guards of the Black Panthers variety), but I still don’t know.

  My first instinct was to jump up and get a couple of pictures to show how small the protest ended up being, but the flood of people in the establishment precluded me from being able to snap a picture.

  The protest was not nearly the thousands of people that were expected to show up and most likely the rain had something to do with that. Even Margery Eagan– a liberal columnist for the Boston Herald and morning talk show host with the unbearable and arrogant Jim Brody– declared in her column covering the protest that the demonstration was a bust.

  While the downpours can be blamed for part of the lack of turnout, they are certainly not solely responsible as the rally started a couple of hours before the rains began. She claims that there were about four hundred protesters in total– and maybe there were before the rain started– but I estimate the crowd that I saw marching down Boylston Street to have number about 100, a generous estimate would be 150 people.

  Perhaps there were more than this before the rain started, but by all accounts this protest did not nearly draw the crowd that these ill informed protesters had hoped for. And while the rain may be partly to blame for this, the fact that before the rain came the protest didn’t draw nearly as many people as had been expected has to be considered proof that there just isn’t as much opposition to the Arizona immigration law– even in Massachusetts– as these protesters believe there is. After all, Jan Brewer was in the state and this was still the best showing that the anti-Arizona protesters could muster.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

8 Comments leave one →
  1. LOUDelf's avatar
    July 11, 2010 9:41 pm

    Fairweather protesters?

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      July 11, 2010 9:54 pm

      Certainly seems to be the case. Although it soesn’t sound like they turned out when the weather was fair either.

      Like

  2. The Georgia Yankee's avatar
    The Georgia Yankee permalink
    July 11, 2010 10:03 pm

    Dunno – maybe – just maybe – some of the potential protesters decided not to attend, justifying their absence with the argument “Well, it’s their state, let them run it how they want to; besides, we have a few problems of our own here in Massachusetts that need our attention . . .”

    Maybe?

    Heard Holder quoted today on NPR along the lines of Arizona is making its own immigration policy and going beyond federal law. I found this to be disappointing and disingenuous after all the analysis showing that the AZ law was pretty much just a rehash of federal law. Most egregious of his misstatements, from my perception, was the declaration that the AZ law requires immigrants to carry documentation of their status. AZ law may have reiterated federal legislation requiring such documentation, but it’s always been federal law that non-citizens must always carry documentation of their status with them. For Holder to declare that AZ is somehow imposing the rule anew is, again, disingenuous.

    After neglecting to prosecute the NBBP storm troopers and then trying to blame the decision on career officers, this isn’t a surprise. I don’t know what personal agenda Holder’s pursuing, but it doesn’t appear to me to be in America’s best interests, and I think the President should ask him to find another job somewhere.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      July 11, 2010 10:20 pm

      Maybe that is the case, but I doubt it. People who feel that feel the way you describe probably were not going to protest in the first place. I think that the original numbers were highly optimistic and spread by the actual protesters and the media to make the movement seem bigger than it was.
      Eric Holder is certainly twisting the truth around about the Arizona law, and it is more than disappointing and disingenuous– it is frightening to see the AG playing so loosly with the truth. We can only hope that the feds will be a little more honest in the courtroom.

      Like

  3. Matt's avatar
    July 11, 2010 11:44 pm

    I hate to sound so cynical, but maybe they didn’t bus people in or pay them enough? It is common for the left.

    Like

  4. mark snyder's avatar
    July 12, 2010 12:21 am

    How about also commending the people who DID show up? Margery’s article was full of false generalizations.

    Like

    • The Georgia Yankee's avatar
      The Georgia Yankee permalink
      July 12, 2010 1:48 am

      What’s to commend? Why should Arizona be at all impressed with the antics of a handful of protesters on the other side of the nation? To whom should the government of Arizona be paying more attention – the citizens of other states wailing in the streets, or the concerns of Arizona’s own voters and taxpayers?

      Or perhaps the officials of Mexico, who’ve made it clear through their actions that they intend to continue promoting the illegal exmigration from their country to ours, perhaps with the plan down the road to produce electoral majorities.

      Arizona’s law mirrors federal law. Why aren’t the protestors out in force protesting federal law if it’s so evil? Can you identify any part of the Arizona law that’s not identical to federal law? And can you explain why any state should undertake to deal with a problem on its own after decades of the national government passing laws it doesn’t enforce and constantly mumbling platitudes while never taking any meaningful action?

      Like

Leave a reply to The Georgia Yankee Cancel reply