Skip to content

Judge blocks Arizona’s immigration law

July 28, 2010

  Today Judge Susan Bolton has put a stop to most of the controversial aspects of Arizona’s new immigration law which was due to go into effect tonight at midnight. This decision is not surprising but it is disappointing nonetheless. There was no way in hell that a federal judge was going to allow this legislation to be implemented while the federal government was challenging its constitutionality.

  Here is a list of the portions of the Arizona immigration law that have been blocked:

• Forbidding police from releasing anyone they have arrested until that person’s immigration status is determined;

• Making it a violation of Arizona law for anyone not a citizen to fail to carry documentation;

• Creating a new state crime for trying to secure work while not a legal resident;

• Allowing police to make warrantless arrests if there is a belief the person has committed an offense that allows them to be removed from the United States.

  Let’s look at these issues one at a time.

  First: the law would allow the Arizona police to hold a person until their immigration status is confirmed. If a person is arrested and does not have the proper identification there is no reason that the police should not be allowed to verify the person’s immigration status, yet now the police will not be able to hold this person. If an American citizen is stopped for a vehicular violation that person is REQUIRED to show identification– IE a drivers license– if that person does not show the proper drivers licence they are punished. Yet a perspective illegal alien– under this ruling– is not subjected to the same laws that an American citizen is held to. They will be allowed to walk away while an American citizen will be subjected to additional charges. This is not fair no matter how you look at it.

  This leads us directly into issue two: a immigrant who is in this country either legally or illegally is not going to have to carry their immigration papers with them. As I stated above, American citizens are required to carry their identification with them at all times that they may be driving, yet aliens will not be held to the same standards as Americans citizens.

  Third: Arizona is not allowed to make it a state crime for an illegal alien to seek work, yet it is still a crime for an American citizen to hire an illegal alien. So under this ruling if an illegal alien seeks work and is hired by an American citizen, the illegal alien has done nothing wrong yet the American citizen can be prosecuted for hiring an illegal alien. How does this make any sense whatsoever? This ruling is backwards. How can an American citizen be prosecuted for a crime when the person that the citizen has hired is allowed to walk free? This is not a defense of a person or company who hires illegal aliens– I believe they should be punished, but so should the person who was here illegally looking for that same job that the American citizen provided.

  Fourth: Arizona will not be able to arrest a suspected illegal alien without a warrant. Honestly, this is the one aspect of the bill that I do not favor. If a person is suspected–but his or her status is not known– of being here illegally there is no need in my opinion to deny this person his or her constitutional right under the fourth amendment before their immigration status is known. Once it is determined that the person is here illegally they should lose all constitutional rights, but until that point they must be considered to have constitutional rights. We cannot begin to usurp the constitution for no reason or it will just lead to more constitutional infringements on the American people.

  So as this legislation makes its way through the courts our borders will remain open and Jan Brewer’s efforts to protect the citizens of her state are for naught. Barack Obama and Eric Holder are suing the state of Arizona over jurisdiction– claiming that it is the federal government’s job to enforce immigration policy; and they will probably win for even though the constitution does not directly mention immigration there is already case law on this subject in their favor. The Supreme Court has already ruled in the case of Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong that  because the constitution grants congress the power to regulate the naturalization process in Article 1 Section 8, that this naturally extends to the federal government the authority  to create and enforce immigration law.

  Jan Brewer has vowed to fight on and I admire her for that, but this is a losing effort– the Obama regime is going to win this battle. But this does highlight exactly where Barack Obama stands on this issue. The federal government has the authority to enforce immigration law but they are unwilling to do so. And they are unwilling to do so because Barack Obama favors the people who are in this country illegally more than he does in protecting the American people from the violence of the drug cartels at the American border.

  Jan Brewer was trying to protect her residents because the Obama regime does not care to do so, but because she was going against the wishes of the Obama regime by enforcing federal immigration law she has run afoul of the regime. Who enforces the law when the federal government refuses to do so? Nobody, according to the Obama regime and this justice department. Arizona passed this law as one last desperate plea to the federal government for help securing the border and protecting American citizens, hoping that this would show Barack Obama how desperate the situation has become. But what does Barack Obama do? He uses this for the sole purpose of trying to gain support for giving amnesty to illegal aliens while ignoring the plea of a beleaguered governor and her people.

  If this case does nothing more than prove to the American people that Barack Obama does not have the protection of the citizens as his first priority while favoring the rights of people who broke the law to get here instead, perhaps some good will come of this fiasco. At least this case will shine a light on the inadequacies of the federal government and its failure to secure the borders while Americans are being killed by the drug cartels.

  It is just a shame, who knows how many Americans will be murdered or robbed, and who knows how many Americans will have their property vandalized by people who have come over the border illegally after this decision was rendered who could have been stopped and deported.

    Barack Obama, Eric Holder and Susan Bolton will have blood on their hands for every illegal alien that commits a violent crime which could have been prevented if it wasn’t for this ruling.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

8 Comments leave one →
  1. The Georgia Yankee's avatar
    The Georgia Yankee permalink
    July 28, 2010 9:55 pm

    I agree that it’s disappointing that injunctions were imposed against enforcing some elements of this law – I would like to have seen how Arizona went about it, because I believe it could have been done fairly. Nevertheless, you’re right, as long as the feds were challenging the law, the controversial aspects aren’t going to go into effect until the entire case is heard.

    I’ve got to disagree on a couple of the individual points, though.

    1. Identification – you compare the case of an American citizen driving and having to carry ID with the case of aliens. The fact is, though, that if not operating a vehicle on public roads, Americans aren’t required to carry ID. Not every lawful encounter between law enforcement and people takes place on the roadways. I’ve always been afraid of that component not only of the Arizona law, but also federal legislation. How many brown-skinned Puerto Ricans live in the Continental USA and speak with accents? What sort of a jam would they get into in Arizona if stopped for, say, jaywalking or littering, and then couldn’t produce any ID papers?

    Federal law requires all non-citizens to carry papers. It’s just that Arizona law enforcement isn’t going to be able to use that law.

    As to driving, I don’t interpret this as requiring that AZ law enforcement, when confronted with license-less drivers, to release them on the assumption that they’re illegal immigrants. Legal or otherwise, those caught violating the laws of Arizona are going to continue to be held to account for those violations.

    The employment issue is the cruz of the matter, though. Can Arizona go after the employers of illegal aliens? I mean, it’s got to be easier than going after every illegal alien, and if the employment dries up, then the illegals will leave, no? I mean,the hypocrisy just oozes out of this sorry issue, with every stakeholder making loud noises about righteousness, but everybody bowing to the almighty dollar. I’ll tell you what, you raid a few chicken farms or whatever it is they do in Arizona and haul off the plant manager and HR manager to jail, and padlock the plant, and do it every single day, and within a month you’ll see some dramatic activity.

    Neither party really wants to see any significant change to the way things are done now, and if new people – Tea Party types – get into office ang accumulate enough power to do something – well, they’ll be corrupted by then too.

    And yeah, the warrantless arrests bother me as well. Toss “suspected illegal aliens” in jail without due process, and just how much better are we than the old Soviet Union or the new Venezuela?

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      July 29, 2010 6:08 am

      As you said, federal law already requires non residents to carry their papers on them anyway, why is this aspect of the Arizona law too controvercial to so many people? That is one thing that I don’t understand.
      As far as employment, I am all for punishing people who hire illegal aliens and you are coreect when you say that if people stop hiring them they would eventually go home. But how can it be that a company can break the law by hiring an illegal, but that illegal can get in no trouble for his or her status. It seems to me that the problem would go away twice as fast if you not only punished the business that hired the illegal, but deported the illegal as well.
      I also would have liked to see this law go into place for awhile to see how it worked before the federal government decided to sue, but Barack Obama was too eager to score political points before the election. This could backfire on him.

      Like

  2. MB's avatar
    July 28, 2010 10:45 pm

    I blasted off on my blog about this, but didn’t really take it as deep as you did (as per the usual). It is frankly frightening that a state is forced to defend itself from invasion and massive cost due to the federal government’s lack of enforcement, only to be sued by the very entity causing the problem. To me, this is not only willful negligence on the federal government’s part, but also corruption in it’s own check-and-balances.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      July 29, 2010 5:58 am

      Agreed 100%, hopefully Arizona will be able to use this to highlight the federal government’s negligence and something good could come from this. I am not holding my breath though.

      Like

  3. LD Jackson's avatar
    LD Jackson permalink
    July 28, 2010 11:00 pm

    I was not surprised in the least to see this happen. The only question I had in my mind was just how badly the judge would gut the law.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      July 29, 2010 5:55 am

      It looks like she gutted it pretty good, at this point she might as well have stopped the whole bill.

      Like

  4. Monana's avatar
    Monana permalink
    July 29, 2010 12:09 am

    “House Bill 2013” and “SB1070”
    0 = Arizona
    2 = USA/ Our Constitution/ We the People of the United States

    This month of July 2010, our U.S. Federal courts have found the so called State of Arizona hate filled legislation namely “House Bill 2013” and “SB1070” Un-constitution (So much for the intellect of Jan Brewer, “Did you read the bills you signed?”). But we all know that they will go crying to the Supreme Court of the United States, please, please, please go. We will fight you in Arizona, any other state, and yes in Washington DC. We will not tire, we will not be silent and we will persevere, I promise you.

    In my opinion the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme of clans; the Baggers, Birthers and Blowhards (people who love to push their beliefs and hate on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate) and that’s who they need to extract from their party if they real want to win in November. Good Luck, because as they said in WACO, “We Ain’t Coming Out”.

    It’s all about politics: Jan Brewer you were never elected to be Governor, but you have no problem trying to get elected on the back of undocumented workers, you loser (sure you may win but the long-term effects to your so called State is just beginning). Here is a partial list of your hate filled legislation;

    1. S.B. 1070,
    2. House Bill 2013
    3. No permit conceal weapons law,
    4. The famous Birthers law,
    5. Banning Ethnic studies law,

    6. Could she be behind the Mural in Prescott, Arizona, ordered to be whiten,
    7. On deck to pass, no citizenship to babies born to undocumented workers,

    8. If she can read she should look up Arizona’s House Bill 2779 from two years ago (which was un-constitution and failed when legally challenged),
    9. The boycotted Martin Luther King Day, what idiots don’t want another holiday? Yes, you guessed it Arizona.

    Well Arizona, you can keep boycotting new holidays, passing hate filled legislation and the rest of our country will continue to challenge you in court of law and Boycott your so-called state.

    Lets face it, no one can real believe anything that comes out of Brewer’s mouth, in an interview, this year, in an attempt to gain sympathy, she first said her father had died in Germany fighting the Nazi in World War II (which ended 1945) but of course we find out the truth that father was never in Germany and died in California in 1955. But we are suppose to believe everything else she says, right!

    As they say in the World Cup: Gooooooooal!

    Like

Leave a comment