Skip to content

New Hampshire Democrats ask for federal investigation into Frank Guinta’s finances

October 28, 2010

  With Frank Guinta remaining ahead of incumbant Democrat Carol Shea-Porter by fifteen points in the race for the first district US House seat, Democrats are desperately looking for a way to bring Frank Guinta down. Realizing that they are losing on the issues and realizing that if this campaign remains focused on the issue they will most certainly lose, they have resorted to a last ditch dirty trick to try to pull voters away from Frank Guinta.

  Last July Frank Guinta amended his financial disclosure report to include a bank account worth up to $500,000 that he had failed to report. I will be the first to admit that I do not understand how a person could have forgotten about a bank account somewhere in the neighborhood of $500,000 and that this is certainly a black eye on Frank Guinta and his campaign. But was this a simple oversight, or was there something more nefarious going on behind the scenes?

  New Hampshire Democrats are claiming that Frank Guinta should have reported this account before the campaign began and they are right, but the fact remains that Frank Guinta willingly reported and disclosed this account last July when he realized his error. That has not stopped New Hampshire Democrats from claiming–without evidence–that Frank Guinta has received some form of illegal campaign contribution and that contribution was the reason for Frank Guinta’s newly found wealth.

“His refusal to produce such documentation is a breach of public trust and invites the inference that a significant illegal campaign contribution in the $250,000 to $500,000 range occurred,”

  Frank Guinta has denied any wrongdoing:

For approximately 20 years prior to my service as mayor, my wife and I both worked in the private sector. I’m proud of the fact that we were both successful,” Guinta said during a debate. “I’m standing on principle. I don’t think it’s necessary to actually open up my bank statements to every single person, and if you don’t like that answer, that is your prerogative

  And with just five days to go before the election New Hampshire Democrats have pulled out all of the stops; today they have asked a federal prosecuter to investigate Frank Guinta to determine whether or not he has received an illegal campaign contribution. Frank Guinta made this disclosure back in July of this year, by my calculations that is three months ago, yet Democrats have waited until the election is less than a week away before lodging a complaint against Frank Guinta. This has all the trappings of an election pl0y and New Hampshire Republicans see it this way as well. Here is what Frank Guinta’s spokesman had to say about this latest revelation:

Trailing in poll after poll, Congresswoman Shea-Porter is desperately hiding behind partisan Democrats to distract from her record of supporting the failed stimulus, Obamacare takeover, and voting with Nancy Pelosi 98 percent of the time

  The Democrats have known about this money for months now, surely if they felt that this disclosure was hiding an illegal campaign donation they would have filed a lawsuit against Frank Guinta before he had the chance to spend the money, would they not? Yet they have decided to wait until this late date to file a complaint. This tells me that they have no proof and probably do not believe that Frank Guinta did anything wrong and they are simply grasping at straws here. 

  Here is what a Democrat spokesman had to say about this:

If Mr. Guinta has done nothing wrong as he claims, an expeditious investigation will benefit him and relieve the public’s concerns at the same time

  I agree 100% with that statement, if Frank Guinta has done nothing wrong he will welcome the chance to clear his name. But the fact is, Democrats purposely waited until such a time where his name could not be cleared in time for the election. They did this on purpose and they did this not in an attempt to seek justice, but in an attempt to sway Guinta’s supporters to either vote for Carol Shea-Porter or stay home and not vote at all;  they did not do this because they felt he had committed a crime or they would not have waited this long.

  This reeks of political gamesmanship. I will be the first to call for Frank Guinta’s resignation if he is elected and is found guilty of campaign fraud, but this is clearly an attempt by the state Democrats to find someone guilty in the eyes of the public of a crime of which there is no proof that he committed.

  New Hampshire Democrats are getting desperate, they see the writing on the wall and they are getting very nervous indeed!

10 Comments leave one →
  1. LD Jackson's avatar
    LD Jackson permalink
    October 28, 2010 8:48 pm

    I hope your assertions are correct, Steve. Sometimes, I wonder about all of these polls. One never knows if they are accurate or not.

    Like

  2. Lenore Patton's avatar
    Lenore Patton permalink
    October 28, 2010 11:12 pm

    I don’t know where to begin to correct your mistakes.

    1. A Reoublican was the first to ask for an investigation of Frank Guinta’s magic bank account, and that was before the primary election. The Democrats also filed a complaint in September, not as you say, too late for Frank to clear up his various stories about where the money came from.

    2. Frank Guinta is 40 years old. He graduated from high school in 1988. He says he went on to college and then to law school. That would bring him up to 1996. He worked for Congressman Jeb Bradley for 4 years and was Mayor of Manchester for 4 years more. That leaves only 6 years of “work in the private sector” to amass a fortune of $250,000 to $500,000 not 20 years as he claims. Pretty amazing trick in a time of recession, don’t you think. During the time in Manchester, he failed to pay his property taxes on severaloccasions, and still has not paid off his college loans. With all that money in the bank, you’d think he would have managed to stay out of debt.

    3. No poll has shown Congresswoman Shea-Porter to be behind by 15 points. In fact the most recent poll has her only 5 points behind in a survey with a 4.5% margin of error.

    4. The Democratic Party has not abandoned Congresswoman Shea-Porter. They have contributed to her campaign, fund-raised for her, and publicly supported her.

    5. Congresswoman Shea-Porter has a grass roots get-out-vote operation that took Jeb Bradley and the pundits by surprise twice. Odds are, Frank Guinta is in for a shock come election day.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      October 29, 2010 6:46 am

      You are right, she is trailing by 10 points, it is Paul Hodes who is trailing by 15. I mixed up my two landslides.

      Like

  3. GadsdenGurl's avatar
    GadsdenGurl permalink
    October 28, 2010 11:26 pm

    The way it happens is, someone else fills out your FEC for you, not you, and they don’t have access to your private accounts.

    It was corrected before anyone said anything about it… and the FEC already saw the statements.

    End of story!

    He has no reason to show them to the Porter campaign or the Democrats.

    Let’s face it, Porter is desperate and can’t run on her record or her treatment of her constituents.

    I am not sure what is so ‘fraudulent’ about self-funding. At least Frank is beholden to no one while Porter is a tool for the left… the unions, etc.

    Amazing how we can have a bunch of murders, sex offenders, tax cheats and convicted criminals in the Dem party but someone fills out a form wrong and bingo!

    Did you know that Carol had 27 such violations on her own FEC forms?

    Like

  4. GadsdenGurl's avatar
    GadsdenGurl permalink
    October 28, 2010 11:28 pm

    Shea-Porter has amended 27 Separate FEC filings.

    If FEC disclosure amendments are really that big a deal, then why are we not discussing the fact that Carol Shea-Porter has had to amend her FEC disclosures 27 times. That’s one filing amended for ever 1.6 months in office. Is she that sloppy? Maybe she took advice from Nancy Pelosi instead of reading the filing rules herself –we know she’ not very good at reading things.

    And, despite that you’d think that after doing this for a while (almost four years) that she’d have figured out how to do it right. But despite having “years of experience” she’s had to amend her FEC filings 10 times just since her reelection in November of 2008.

    (from Granite Grok)

    When the Federal Election Commission has to find you and tell you that you must amend your campaign disclosures because you are very likely violating federal law. It looks like Carol has had to be reminded at least nine times.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      October 29, 2010 6:42 am

      Well said! Hopefully Lenore Patton will come back to read your rebuttal.

      Like

      • GadsdenGurl's avatar
        GadsdenGurl permalink
        October 29, 2010 1:46 pm

        Well you can thank my our excellent blogging friend Steve MacDonald who did the research on that.

        Like

  5. rjjrdq's avatar
    October 29, 2010 1:18 am

    Well, he could always use the TurboTax defense. You’re right, this is just political gamesmanship.

    Like

  6. LD Jackson's avatar
    LD Jackson permalink
    October 29, 2010 6:46 am

    I am always suspicious of late-hour “discoveries” during a campaign. I got a kick out of how the Democrats are claiming an expeditious investigation is in order. Do they really think anyone will believe that such an investigation can be accomplished in five days? I don’t live in New Hampshire, but this sounds a lot like a political smear campaign to me.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      October 29, 2010 7:11 am

      This money has been known about for months, yet the Democrats wait until a time when they know his name cannot be cleared before the election to ask for an investigation. This is being done just to sway voters away from him. If he is guilty of a crime I will be the first to condemn him, but this seems like posturing to me!
      We will have to see how this plays out now, and if he is elected, after the election as well.

      Like

Leave a reply to GadsdenGurl Cancel reply