Skip to content

Ward Bird’s pardon hearing set for February 1st

January 20, 2011

  Yesterday the New Hampshire Executive Council decided by a vote of 5-0 to grant Ward Bird his pardon hearing request and the governor decided not to block the move–which he could have done under the state law. Last night the Executive Council announced the date of the hearing and it has been set for February 1st.

  Governor John Lynch is urging Ward Bird to be at his hearing in order to “explain himself” because Bird refused to take the stand in his original trial, and he would like to hear Ward Bird describe what happened that day in his own words, while the Executive Council is debating whether or not to subpoena Christina Harris–the woman that Ward Bird allegedly threatened–to testify at the hearing because as Executive Council member David Wheeler said, “her credibility has to be part of the hearing because the case is a total ‘He said, she said.”

  And that is what is at the crux of this case, it is one man’s word against one woman’s and I am mot sure how there was ever enough evidence in this case to convict Ward Bird. As it stands right now it looks to me as if a complete pardon isn’t going to happen, but rather a commutation of Ward Bird’s sentence. While this will return Ward Bird to his family he will still lose his constitutional right to keep and bear arms, so here is hoping that a full pardon is still not out of the question.

  We will know soon enough, the Executive Council will vote on February 2nd–one day after the hearing–and the recommendation will be sent to the governor’s desk for his decision.

5 Comments leave one →
  1. Conservatives on Fire's avatar
    January 20, 2011 12:49 pm

    let’s hope Mr. Bird finally receives justice. This is one the strangest cases I’ve heard of. It does point to problems that occur with the minimum sentence policy.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      January 20, 2011 10:03 pm

      We will know soon enough! The interesting thing here is the fact that I always supported minimum sentencing guidelines because I thought the prevented liberal judges from handing out lenient sentences, but this case has forced me to rethink my position.

      Like

  2. John Martin's avatar
    January 21, 2011 5:13 pm

    I sincerely hope that Ms. Harris is served a subpoena to appear. It will be interesting if she is asked to explain her history of combative behavior as evidenced by her former probation officer, former landlord and members of the business community who had dealings with her and broke them off as a result of her aberrent behavior.

    Once the totality of evidence is heard, as was disallowed in Ward’s trial, a far different perception of the situation will be had.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      January 21, 2011 9:51 pm

      I hope she is called upon also. I am hoping that this story will have a happy ending, we will know soon enough!

      Like

  3. ron's avatar
    ron permalink
    February 2, 2011 10:18 am

    Okay, it doesn’t make sense that she “as the purported victim” was there. She’s just chicken sh—-” cause she knows the truth and doesn’t want them to have access to her criminal records and lies. Had she not been “criminally trespassing” all this would never have happened. So, in the commission of her crime, she purports this happened. Why was she not charged by Moultonboro police.

    Like

Leave a reply to Conservatives on Fire Cancel reply