The Senate votes on Obamacare repeal
Earlier this year the House voted in favor of repealing Obamacare in its entirety sending the bill to the Senate for a vote. Harry Reid had vowed to block this bill from ever making it to the Senate floor for a vote but today the bill made it to the Senate floor and the bill failed along party lines by a vote of 51-47.
There never really was a chance that the Democrat controlled Senate would vote to repeal Obamacare but Harry Reid did not want vulnerable Democrats forced into voting in support of the unpopular and unconstitutional legislation. But today the Republicans successfully forced the vote and now we have ALL of the Senate Democrats on record as supporting the Obamcare legislation which was recently ruled unconstitutional by a Florida judge. Apparently the constitutionality of the legislation is of no concern to the Democrats.
When the House passed the repeal legislation it was widely viewed as a symbolic victory–which is basically all that it was–but the vote held earlier today could have ramifications in the 2012 elections which will be more far reaching than if this were just a symbolic vote because this could affect the next elections. People now know exactly who still supports this legislation and they can now be targeted and the crosshairs will be on them when the people head to the polls in November of 2012. And this is precisely the reason why Harry Reid did not want to vote on a bill in which he was guaranteed the outcome he wanted; he did not want to force vulnerable Democrats to go on record as supporting Obamacare, even though we all know they do support it.
What this vote did was make the healthcare issue much more transparent than Harry Reid would have liked it to be, and it also ensures that healthcare will still be a major topic in the 2012 election, much to the chagrin of Democrats who had hoped that is would disappear by that point. We now know that ALL Democrats still support the measure even after it has been ruled unconstitutional and we will have the chance to hold ALL of these Democrats accountable for their vote today.
Just getting the repeal vote to the floor against the will of Harry Reid was a victory in and of itself and it may show us that Harry Reid’s influence is waning just a little bit. And this vote could prove troublesome in the 2012 election because of the 33 seats which will be up for grabs the Democrats currently hold 23 of them. And out of those 23 seats, many of them are held by Democrats in Republican leaning districts who rode Bush Derangement Syndrome to victory in 2006; when you consider how unpopular this legislation is, these Democrat may have signed their walking papers today, and there is the real chance that Republicans can now pick up enough votes to repeal Obamacare in 2012 if the Supreme Court does not strike down the law before then.
As of right now it looks as if the Supreme Court will probably hear the Obamacare case later on this year during the next session of the court, but there is a push underway to get the case heard before then and there are some Democrats who would like to see this case adjudicated as soon as possible. Here is what Bill Nelson had to say on this issue:
The vote to repeal health care is largely symbolic, because the Supreme Court is going to have to be the one to decide this matter,” Nelson said in a statement. “We ought to do the right thing and ask the High Court to rule quickly so we don’t keep arguing over this for the next several years
Bill Nelson is exactly right because as the Obama regime looks prepared to ignore the Florida court’s ruling and as the Obama regime looks to keep moving forward with a law that has been deemed unconstitutional we appear to be headed towards a constitutional crisis which must be resolved one way or the other as soon as possible. There are too many questions which must be answered and we cannot afford to let this law hang in limbo until the next Supreme Court session.
The House needs to move to immediately defund this legislation pending the Supreme Court nomination if Barack Obama continues to ignore the court.

Yup… getting them on record, Obamacare=yes, Obamacare=no, was the point. We won and they don’t even know it. Now we won’t have to dig through hundreds of speeches to dig out statements loaded with weasel words. We KNOW who supports an unConstitutional law! 😀
LikeLike
Exactly! I think the Republicans knew this would never pass and it was their plan all along to get the Democrats on record.
LikeLike
Harry Reid:
Constitution we ain’t got no Constitution? We don’t need no Constitution!
I don’t need to follow no stinking Constitution!
Hopefully the SCOTUS will bring our country back to follow the Constitution!
With Gods Help!
LikeLike
Hopefully the Supreme Court will expidite this case because there is just too much uncertaintly around it right now.
LikeLike
The fact that a Florida judge ruled the law unconstitutional doesn’t make it so for all time. While I think in the long run SCOTUS will declare it so, or at least the mandate, Dem Senators aren’t bound to vote in accordance with what a single judge in Florida declares.
Of course, if SCOTUS throws out the whole thing, count on the GOP to forget about its widely heralded improvements to our current system.
Take good care and may God bless us all!
TGY
LikeLike
No they aren’t, but it gave them the “out” they needed and they didn’t take it.
LikeLike
The SCOTUS will allow the authority for an individual mandate under the doctrine of implied powers. For example the US post office and the military draft aren’t in the constitution but they are there. The US had an income tax (during the Civil War) decades before there was an amendment specifically giving Uncle Sugar the authority for one.
LikeLike
Absolutely they had no expectation to get it repealed in the Senate, and knew all along what they could expect, and what they were trying to accomplish. Regardless, getting 3 dems to take a stand against Obamacare, even if only for their votes back home, seems so doable, and yet, I think it’s the power and intimidation they still feel unable to face with Pelosi (very early on one of my most liberal friends could not stand her because of how she turned against a pal of his for not towing the party line). Still, we’re talkning only three votes, and THAT astounds me. For any of your readers that my not yet be exposed to “the chart”, I include this link: https://sosmass.wordpress.com/2011/01/22/obamacare-can-be-repealed-in-the-senate/
LikeLike
As of now, the bill is dead. Did Obama file for some kind of relief from the Florida decision? If not, Obamacare is dead. That would mean the Senate voted on a law that didn’t exist.
LikeLike
Technically true, but we must continue moving forward anyway because you never know how the Supreme Court is going to rule.
LikeLike
This just shows that the whole debate about health care is another political battle in which ordinary people will lose. I don’t think the repeal of the bill as a whole is the right choice. What about the provision saying that nobody can be denied health insurance because of a pre-existing condition? Is it right to prevent those diagnosed with serious medical conditions from participating in the system of health insurance?
LikeLike
Yes it is right to deny people who have been diagnosed with a serious medical condition healthcare insurance. The ban against denying people with pre-existing conditions healthcare coverage is one of the worst provisions in this bill.
Healthcare insurance is just that–insurance–and people pay into the healthcare system over the years just in case they need insurance. If people are allowed to forego healthcare insurance until they have a serious illness and then are allowed to purchase insurance to cover that illness it really isn’t insurance is it? This part of the bill is designed to force insurance companies out of business because they will not be able to make money if they have to cover people who haven’t paid into the system. I know that liberals such as yourself think that people making money is a bad thing, but the fact is that it is not.
LikeLike