Skip to content

Was Elena Kagan involved in the healthcare reform law defense before she bacame a Supreme Court jusitce?

April 26, 2011

  The push is already on by the left to pressure Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from the healthcare reform case once it makes its way to the Supreme Court and I do believe that there is the very real chance that he may in fact recuse himself from the case. Justice Thomas’s wife–Virginia–began a lobbying group which opposed the healthcare reform law and may have profited from this group. This means that Clarence Thomas also would have profited from his wife’s activities and if this is indeed the case than he is bound by ethical and moral standards to recuse himself from the healthcare reform case.

  But while the left remains adamant that Justice Thomas must recuse himself from this case because of the actions of his spouse–not his own–they remain silent on another possible conflict of interest with a Supreme Court justice who may have in fact counseled Barack Obama on the healthcare reform law, and actually helped to set up his defense team for the healthcare reform law challenge–and that justice is Elena Kagan.

  Elena Kagan served in the Obama regime’s cabinet as Solicitor General and among her duties as Solicitor General was to defend the Obama regime’s positions in federal court. After she assigned her top deputy to handle the healthcare reform challenges she remained active in the regime and did not relinquish her duties as Solicitor General for another four months. While she claims that she never advised Barack Obama on the healthcare reform law, are we really supposed to believe that as she set up the defense team for this law that she never once gave her position on this issue?

  Here is more on this issue:

On Jan. 8, 2010, Brian Hauck, senior counsel to Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli, emailed Neal Katyal, principal deputy solicitor general, to tell him that Perrelli wanted “to put together a group to get thinking about how to defend against the inevitable challenges to the health care proposals that are pending.”  On receiving that email, Katyal immediately emailed back to Hauck, saying: “Absolutely right on. Let’s crush them. I’ll speak to [Solicitor General] Elena [Kagan] and designate someone.”

Katyal, who was Kagan’s top subordinate, then forwarded Hauck’s email to Kagan and said, “I am happy to do this if you are ok with it.” He also offered his colleague Deputy Solicitor General Ed Kneedler as a possible candidate for handling the health-care issue, or the two of them together.

Kagan instantly assigned Katyal. “You should do it,” she said by return email.

That email exchange took place at about 11:00 am on a workday. About two hours later, shortly after 1:00 pm, Katyal emailed again to Hauck in the associate attorney general’s office ostensibly to inform him of his boss, Elena Kagan’s, determinations.

“Brian,” Katyal wrote, “Elena would definitely like OSG to be involved in this set of issues. I will handle this myself, along with an Assistant from my office [name redacted] and will bring in Elena as needed.”

  It is unimaginable and requires the “willing suspension of disbelief” (to use Hillary Clinton’s words to berate General Petraeus on the floor of the Congress) to actually believe that Elena Kagan was active in the Obama regime, helped to set up his defense of the healthcare reform law, and never once made her feelings known on this issue. It is totally unbelievable that Elena Kagan could set up the legal defense of Obamacare and not believe the healthcare law was constitutional and expect her appointee to hold the same position that she held. Elana Kagan appointed Neal Katyal knowing full well that he held her positions as his own in regards to healthcare reform and it seems highly unlikely to me that she never once spoke about this issue, or how to defend it, while she was his superior.

  Of course, we may never know for sure because the administration is fighting a FOIA request which could shed more light on what role Elena Kagan actually played leading up to the signing of Obamacare and beyond.

8 Comments leave one →
  1. Conservatives on Fire's avatar
    April 26, 2011 9:12 pm

    Her finger prints are all over this case. She must recuse herself. This “transparent” regime has been less than cooperative when it comes to FOIA requests.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      April 27, 2011 6:29 am

      I believe she must also, and I have to giver her credit because she has already recused herself from 25 cases for this very reason. I don’t see how she can justify not recusing herself from this one.

      Like

  2. Matt's avatar
    April 26, 2011 10:46 pm

    This has been floating around for a while. I think the call for Thomas to recuse himself is a dodge to take the attention off of Kagan’s actual participation in the effort.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      April 27, 2011 6:31 am

      Yeah, I’ve written about this in the past, but since that time CNS News has managed to get some of her emails through a FOIA request and in my opinion they raise more questions. The administration has not released all the documents and you have to feel that they must show an even stronger link.

      Like

  3. The Georgia Yankee's avatar
    April 26, 2011 11:31 pm

    No, the call for Thomas’ recusal would have thappened absent Kagan – the conflict there is strong and to believe that Thomas never spoke about the issue with Virginia also requires the willing suspension of disbelief.

    Denis, I’m fairly sure you wrote about this a little while back, because I clearly remember saying then that even if Kagan really never discussed the issue with anyone in the administration, she should still sit this one out.

    Take good care and may God bless us all!

    TGY

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      April 27, 2011 6:33 am

      Yes I have written about this before and yes you did say she should sit this one out. There have been new emails released on this, that is why I wrote about it again. I do think that Thomas probably should sit this one out as well and it will be interesting to see what happens on this issue.

      Like

  4. Chris Tune's avatar
    Chris Tune permalink
    November 26, 2011 2:24 pm

    Certainly this following description does not mean that citizens (i.e. sitting Justices of the SCOTUS) are “required” to have no opinion whatsoever regarding laws created by the Legislature. So, are we to reason that the mere fact of my spouse, and I being conservative, and my spouse working for an organization which is marshalling research in opposition to a law, is sufficient grounds for my recusal (I’m putting myself in Justice Thomas’s shoes)? What do we call “reasonable”? If extended too far, this might apply to any generalized “liberal” or “conservative” leaning.

    [this is the Wiki description for “recusal” – note the specific mention of having served as counsel on the case!]

    In the United States, the term “recusal” is used most often with respect to court proceedings. Two sections of Title 28 of the United States Code (the Judicial Code) provide standards for judicial disqualification or recusal. Section 455, captioned “Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge,” provides that a federal judge “shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” The same section also provides that a judge is disqualified “where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding”; when the judge has previously served as a lawyer or witness concerning the same case or has expressed an opinion concerning its outcome; or when the judge or a member of his or her immediate family has a financial interest in the outcome of the proceeding.

    Like

  5. z4niness's avatar
    z4niness permalink
    June 4, 2012 12:07 pm

    From what I read, she was. From my point of view, Elena Kagan did a good job, even if some of the people judge her and her actions as well. I also read some really nice articles about Trey White, who was involved in several healthcare movements which brought good changes in out law at the moment.

    Like

Leave a reply to The Georgia Yankee Cancel reply