Gunrunner: Tampering with evidence at Brian Terry’s murder scene
Contrary to the federal government’s official declaration that only two weapons were found at the scene where Brian Terry was murdered, newly uncovered emails show that three weapons authorized for sale by the federal government were actually found at the murder scene.
A third gun linked to “Operation Fast and Furious” was found at the murder scene of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, new documents obtained exclusively by Fox News suggest, contradicting earlier assertions by federal agencies that police found only two weapons tied to the federal government’s now infamous gun interdiction scandal.
Why would the federal government lie about the number of weapons found at the murder scene related to the Gunrunner scandal? Because one of these weapons “disappeared” shortly after Brian Terry was murdered. Almost from the very beginning it seems as if the federal government was involved in a coverup.
The next logical question would be; what was the federal government trying to cover up? It turns out that the federal government had an FBI informant in Mexico who was involved in the scandal and was providing the Mexican drug cartels with the money they needed to illegally buy these weapons and this third weapon was much more easily traceable to that FBI informant.
The federal government’s official story is now this: the government removed this weapon from the crime scene in order to protect the FBI informant, but one has to think that the federal government was probably more interested in protecting themselves from the investigation which is now underway. Why would this informant’s life be in danger if the facts of the Gunrunner scandal were not brought to light? Surely the Mexican drug lords would not know who purchased which weapons so it seems to be a very weak argument to me, and it seems more likely that the federal government was afraid that this weapon would most likely be an easier weapon to track back to this deadly scandal, and that is why the federal government began tampering with evidence from the very beginning of this scandal.
In my opinion–as of right now–this FBI informant did nothing wrong. He was doing his job as an informant and had no idea that once the drug lords purchased these weapons the weapons would be allowed to walk. Common sense tells us that once these weapons were in the hands of drug lords the federal government would have swooped in and arrested the drug lords if cracking down on drug violence was the true goal of this deadly operation–but of course that is not what the goal of this operation was. But that did not happen; the FBI informant did his job while the federal government did not so their job.
On top of all the criminal activity the federal government committed during this crime we can now add tampering with evidence at a crime scene. This just furthers my belief that the responsiblity for this operation goes all the way up to Eric Holder and possibly even Barack Obama.
Here is what Mike Vanderboegh, a man who has been covering this scandal from the beginning and is a Fast and Furious expert, had to say about this new information:
This information confirms what our sources were saying all along — that the FBI was covering up the true circumstances of the murder of Brian Terry,” added Mike Vanderboegh, an authority on the Fast and Furious investigation who runs a whistleblower website called Sipsey Street.
“It also confirms that the FBI was at least as culpable, and perhaps more culpable, than the ATF in the (Fast and Furious) scandal, and that there was some guiding hand above both these agencies (and the other agencies involved) coordinating the larger operation,”
America's Watchtower 
Steve, why does anyone lie about something? They did something wrong and they are having to cover it up. I think that sums it up. Yes, they did something WRONG.
LikeLike
Exactly! They wouldn’t by lying if they did nothing wrong.
LikeLike
There is one thing that for me doesn’t compute. maybe you have a theory, Steve. I don’t understand why the drug cartels needed money to buy guns? One thing the cartels are not short of is money. They are swimming in money. I don’t get it.
LikeLike
Now that is a great question that I hadn’t thought of. I wish I could give you a theory, but this is something that i didn’t think of. Something isn’t quite right here!
LikeLike
Maybe we are being lied to about the money going to them, maybe it went elsewhere and we were just told that to justify where it went. You think the cartel would have a press conference and say they didn’t get the money from us that we (administration) said we gave them….I doubt it.
LikeLike
Who knows where this money actually went? All we do know is that we can no longer trust our government to tell us the truth.
LikeLike
Something I can’t understand is why a real criminal investigation isn’t already ongoing. I know Darrell Issa is working to get to the bottom of what was really going on, but I think a criminal investigation would be in order.
LikeLike
Darrell Issa is doing a great job but there is only so much he can do. Perhaps he wants to get everything in line before he turns this over to a special prosecutor.
LikeLike
CNN recently covered the “Missing” Heat Seeking Surface-to-Air Missiles in Libya. Up to 20,000 of them! That takes a pretty good size bank role to buy those! They have a two mile range! I imagine we will find the money was used to purchase something significant.
LikeLike
Now that is a scary thought and I hope that you are wrong, but we just can’t be sure where the money went, can we?
LikeLike