Skip to content

Intelligence source in Libya contradicts Barack Obama narrative about the embassy attack

September 17, 2012

 Barack Obama has maintained the position that the attacks on the United States embassies in the Middle East grew out of a spontaneous peaceful protest against a You Tube video, going so far as to send the Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, out to push this false narrative in order to shield himself and his failed policies from the death of Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

  This is part of what she had to say:

Ms. Rice said on ABC that the assault on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi Tuesday started with a “small number of people” seeking to replicate a violent protest that had broken out in Cairo. “And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that … in the wake of the revolution in Libya … are quite common and accessible,” she said. “And it then evolved from there.”

  The official Obama regime account of how the events in Libya unfolded has been contradicted by Libya president, Mohammed el-Megarif, who called the account unfounded and preposterous:

The idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous,” Libyan President Mohammed el-Megarif told the liberal National Public Radio network.

Instead, the killing was a military-style attack, he said.

   And now an intelligence source on the ground in Libya is backing up el-Megarif’s account and contradicting the Obama regime’s official story:

There was no protest and the attacks were not spontaneous,” the source said, adding the attack “was planned and had nothing to do with the movie.”

The source said the assault came with no warning at about 9:35 p.m. local time, and included fire from more than two locations. The assault included RPG’s and mortar fire, the source said, and consisted of two waves.

  So, who are we supposed to believe, a man who is trying to protect his reputation in order to win reelection after he promised the American people Muslim violence would end if he were elected president, (but I though Islam was a peaceful religion), and who is thousands of miles away from the violence, or people who are actually in the country and saw what happened?

  I know what my answer is, what’s your’s?

19 Comments leave one →
  1. bunkerville's avatar
    bunkerville permalink
    September 17, 2012 8:08 pm

    I am just so sure it was the video clip. So sure.

    Like

    • lou222's avatar
      lou222 permalink
      September 17, 2012 8:28 pm

      Sure you are, B! Might I add “in a pigs eye”! We ALL know what happened and they are just digging that hole deeper, but for some reason it works for this man (term used lightly)!

      On a side note: I had that short trailer sent to me as a youtube video, watched it, decided it was total crap and wrote it off. Now today I tried to click on it to attach here and it took me to the youtube site and wanted me to “sign in”…damage control? That will teach me not to download and save something next time before it “goes away”.

      Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        September 17, 2012 8:35 pm

        It works for him because the media doesn’t question him. If this happened under Bush all hell would break loose.

        Like

      • Conservatives on Fire's avatar
        September 17, 2012 9:00 pm

        Steve is right. The media is working over time to protect Obama on this one. They will never admit that his policies have failed dramaticly. Obama has dug himself into a hole and he has no choice but to keep digging.

        Like

      • lou222's avatar
        lou222 permalink
        September 17, 2012 9:21 pm

        I read an article that said Eric Bolling on FOX, The Five came out and said that Obama holds the Koran, first and the Constitution, second….wonder what the media will do with that? It is true, but I know that truth doesn’t matter to them, only the protection of their man (term used lightly). I was glad to hear someone finally say it, but am sure it will be pushed under the rug and somehow they will try and make Mr. Bolling “go away”. Jamu Green can say nasty comments and have people call for her to be taken off the air, but she was not….but you probably know her party affiliation.

        Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        September 17, 2012 9:44 pm

        Hopefully at this point he is digging his own grave Jim.

        Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        September 17, 2012 9:45 pm

        It certainly seems as if Bolling is right about this Lou!

        Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      September 17, 2012 8:34 pm

      Yeah, me too!

      Like

  2. rjjrdq's avatar
    September 17, 2012 11:21 pm

    With the media to back them up, Obama can just keep on lying through November.

    Like

  3. donchute's avatar
    donchute permalink
    September 18, 2012 6:34 am

    “Eric Bolling on FOX, The Five came out and said that Obama holds the Koran, first and the Constitution, second…” This is true, I heard it myself on The Five yesterday…Eric did try to back peddle just a tad later in the show [probably his producers made him do it] but it was not what Bolling wanted to say [you could tell]…Bob Beckel [the lib] said to EB…”Don’t worry I have said much worse things myself…it’l be ok.”

    Point is…lets do what the left does after making a ‘cross the line’ statement(s)…PROVE IT! thats right Maobama you need to prove EB’s statement false through your words, deeds, and actions…but even you will try to sweep this out of the way because it was a direct hit on your persona…Yeah You Go Eric Bolling…wish more in the media had your balls!

    PLU from SSF

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      September 18, 2012 7:25 pm

      The left never backs down from anything they say no matter how outrageous the claim is, in that respect you have to admire them. I only wish we would do the same.

      Like

  4. MTBirkmire's avatar
    MTBirkmire permalink
    September 18, 2012 5:41 pm

    according to wnd.com. The United States sent a gay ambassador to libya…? hillary sacrificed this democratic gay leader to muslims?

    Like

  5. Rick's avatar
    September 18, 2012 6:24 pm

    We are dealing with a culture that dates back before the Assyrian Empire.
    They have always hated the Jew.
    The death of our Libyan ambassador has little if nothing to do with the film Innocents of Muslim.
    They have hated Israel since the rebuilding of the temple and before and it is not just the brother of Israel who hates Gods people, it is also the Zeitgeist.
    The Zeitgeist hates the WEST and the freedom the west represents.
    The Main stream Media represents the Zeitgeist to a large extent.
    The islamist will, over time, intimidate every government and every culture. How do you fight against those who not only care not about life but actually put value on their own death in the pursuit of the will of Allah.

    Our current American devision is evidence that God is at play here. SImply stated if Obama wins this next election we will witness the end of a great experiment. We as Americans will get what we deserve because of the lethargic attitude of most Americans and Israel will finally be attacked when they are surrounded by their enemies for a final strike.

    America has been a protector of Israel. America was also the force that held back the Spirit that now is. If Obama is re-elected that will also end.
    The Arab who hates his brother sided with Austria and Germany in WWI and WWII. They fought the west and lost both times and still they persist.
    They lost their Caliphate in Turkey in WW! but it will soon return like a serpent who’s head was wounded unto death but healed.
    Then will come the final destruction.

    Thing is Iran will never get a chance to eliminate our friend Israel. But they will try and enter Israel by foot and that is when God Himself will appear in defense of His people.
    The whole world will see it.

    Like

  6. MTBirkmire's avatar
    MTBirkmire permalink
    September 18, 2012 8:00 pm

    I know that! I’m just saying these actions by the state dept. under obama isn’t ANYTHING like what AMERICAN is supposed to be. It was obvious the film had nothing to do with the attack, they’ve been celebrating 9/11 over and over.It’s shocking and infuriating to see our alleged leaders acting more like foreigners who hate us.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      September 18, 2012 8:58 pm

      Amen to that! There is no way in hell the attack was because of a video, this was planned over months to coincide with September 11th and they knew Barack Obama was too weak to do anything. The fact that his first response was to apologize for the video tell us all that we need to know about who this man is.

      Like

    • rickrosenberger's avatar
      rickrosenberger permalink
      September 19, 2012 5:58 pm

      Yes, I trust that you know the movie has little to do with the Chris’s murder.
      My comment was not in response to you (sorry if it appeared that way)
      I was venting over the history of the thing.

      Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        September 19, 2012 10:03 pm

        There is a long history here and we shouldn’t have been caught off guard like this, but Barack Obama truly believes that everyone loves him and his narcissism and his megalomania won’t allow him to see the truth.

        Like

Trackbacks

  1. Libyan officials claim they gave the United States three days warning an attack was coming at the embassy « America's Watchtower

Leave a comment