A Hillary Clinton aide knew the attack on the American consulate in Libya was terrorism one day later, but Susan Rice and Barack Obama didn’t?
On September 12th, 2012–one day after the deadly terrorist attack on the American consulate in Libya which left Chris Stevens raped and murdered along with three other Americans Patrick F. Kennedy–one of Hillary Clinton’s top aides–briefed members on Capitol Hill and informed them that the attack appeared to be a terrorist attack.
He made clear that this was a sophisticated attack,” said one Hill staff aide with a security clearance. “He indicated this was fairly complex, and not, like, a protest that got out of hand. … These were not the kind of weapons you tote around
Within one day people in the Obama regime knew this was a coordinated terrorist attack and not the result of peaceful protest of a You Tube video run amok, yet this did not stop UN Ambassador Susan Rice from hitting every television outlet she could find and state the opposite a few days later.
And this did not stop Barack Obama from addressing the United Nations on September 25th–a full two weeks after the attack–from blaming the You Tube video for the attack.
Susan Rice knew the truth while she was on television lying about the attack and she is now defending herself by saying she was only going with the best intelligence she had available at the time–she can’t be responsible if the intelligence was wrong. We now know her defense of her lies is also a lie and she knew full well this was a terrorist attack almost from the beginning.
Two weeks after the attack there is no way in hell Barack Obama can expect us to believe he didn’t know the truth when he spoke in front of the United Nations but that didn’t stop him from lying in an attempt to appease the Muslim world by throwing an American under the bus.
Barack Obama’s policy of appeasement makes him the Neville Chamberlain of our time, only worse. At least Neville Chamberlain broke promises to the people of other countries in his attempt to appease Adolf Hitler, he didn’t throw his own people under the bus.
Meanwhile we have an American citizen rotting in jail because of the Libya attack and without bail or charges, apparently the first victim of the recently passed NDAA.
America's Watchtower 
Steve, I sure hope Romney gets the chance to rake Obama over the coals on this in the next debate he has with the empty suit (chair).
LikeLike
I am not sure what the topic will be in the next debate, but I hope it is foreign policy. I think it will be because Romney gave a foreign policy speech today, I think he is setting up his position for the debate. Romney has a chance to hammer Obama over this and I hope he does.
LikeLike
The second debate is supposed to cover foreign and domestic policy. Romney should have a chance to bring up Libya. If he does, he should point blank ask Obama what he knew and when he knew it. Make the President lie to the American people on national television. He needs to call him out on this and push the issue. It is that big of a deal, in my opinion.
LikeLike
Good, I am glad to hear foreign policy will be in this debate. This is a huge deal in my opinion as well and Romney needs to hammer him on this. Obama will fall back on bin Laden while ignoring the fact the Middle East is on fire and it will be up to Romney to make sure the Libya attack becomes a campaign issue.
LikeLike
I believe they knew as well, they were sure the media could cover this, guess they were wrong this time. Will it take off and fly? Guess we will see.
LikeLike
I think it might be starting to gain traction but perhaps that is the optimist in me
LikeLike