Skip to content

Benghazi: More whistle blowers could be coming soon

May 12, 2013

  After the testimony of three whistle blowers last week, and with the revelation of emails which show the State Department was actively involved in changing the CIA’s talking points, it appears as if things might be getting even worse for the Obama regime in regards to Benghazi.

  Representative Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has stated that the House Intelligence Committee has been contacted and expects more whistle blowers to come forward in the future.

I do think we’re going to see more whistle blowers. I certainly know my committee has been contacted

  Uh-oh! Now that three brave whistle blowers have come forward and testified it appears as if the floodgates might be about to open, and coupled with the fact that the mainstream media might now be beginning to question what happened that night in Benghazi and the weeks following the attack it could be a long second term for a president who is quickly falling into lame duck status.

  And for those of you who are still trying to defend the president on Benghazi by claiming this is nothing but a political attack I would remind you that one key whistle blower from last week, Greg Hicks, is a registered Democrat who voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2008 primary and voted for Barack Obama for president in both 2008 and 2012.

 Drip, drip, drip…..

19 Comments leave one →
  1. LD Jackson's avatar
    LD Jackson permalink
    May 13, 2013 5:21 am

    I just can’t help but wonder how many more people have to come forward before the media finally admits this story is not a political witch hunt, but rather a concerted effort by the Obama administration to keep the truth from the American people?

    Seriously, we all know bad things happen. Sometimes, those bad things can not be avoided. There may have been nothing of substance the Obama administration could have done to stop the attack in Benghazi, or to save the Ambassador, but did they have to lie to us, just to save political face?

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      May 13, 2013 5:29 am

      I think the media might finally be starting to ask a few questions, not many but it is a start. If this does happen maybe we will learn the truth.

      Like

  2. Cheryl's avatar
    Cheryl permalink
    May 13, 2013 12:40 pm

    Don’t count on the truth ever being told by the mobsters that run this country! Life will never be more important than money to some people

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      May 13, 2013 7:24 pm

      Sadly you are right, we may never learn the truth because of the lengths Obama will go to in order to keep it hidden.

      Like

  3. lou222's avatar
    lou222 permalink
    May 13, 2013 3:38 pm

    I guess my problem with this, is there are entirely too many things hitting at once for the focus to be on one problem. Is this done on purpose, again? You have Benghazi, Jody Arias, Dr. Gosnell, the IRS, and of course the Boston bombings, I am sure I could think of more…oh ya, the explosions that happened out in West, Texas at that ammonia plant (now is it the EMS guy?), the shooting in New Orleans on Mothers Day,maybe F&F has been put on hold and what about Immigration Reform???? I have a feeling if they overload the system, the American people just tune it all out…maybe that is what they are hoping for.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      May 13, 2013 7:26 pm

      Well, I am going to do my best to cover it all (at least the important ones) but it is not going to be easy.

      Like

  4. Ron Russell's avatar
    May 13, 2013 7:29 pm

    I’m reminded of the little Dutch boy and the Dyke. Obama just doesn’t have enough fingers to plug all the leaks and I see a great flood coming. Of course there will be other whistle blowers. It is only difficult for those who step forward first, but after that you get the bandwagon effect with everyone wanting in on the kill. Human nature is just that, human nature.

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      May 13, 2013 7:33 pm

      The floodgates might be about to be opened and when they are I hope it washes the whole Obama regime away.

      Like

    • lou222's avatar
      lou222 permalink
      May 14, 2013 9:16 am

      OR, Ron, they do not want to be blamed for the outcome, so are finally stepping forward. If they had integrity, they would have come out before now. That they are finally stepping up to the plate, I guess we can commend them a little, but it would have been nice had they done it from the get-go. We know there is a cover-up and we know that it was a shady deal going on to begin with (as is everything this administration does), now will the media finally start reporting the truth? With the AP wire tapping, maybe the shine is finally going to wear off of their shining star in the White House. We can hope, can’t we?

      Like

      • Cheryl's avatar
      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        May 14, 2013 10:39 pm

        There is no doubt in my mind that the reason they didn’t come forward sooner is because they were threatened and intimidated. I wish they had come forward sooner but I am glad they have finally stepped up to the plate.

        Like

      • Cheryl's avatar
        Cheryl permalink
        May 15, 2013 10:19 am

        So the bottom line is President Obama was so anxious to preserve his reputation as a peace candidate that he resisted calls for intervention which might have saved — and, to be fair, could have cost additional — American lives. He certainly put politics first!

        Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        May 15, 2013 10:21 am

        That is exactly the way I see it, he did not want to risk escalating the conflict so instead made the political decision to do nothing and hope for the best.

        Like

      • Cheryl's avatar
        Cheryl permalink
        May 15, 2013 11:03 am

        But as the attack escalated, why didn’t the Defense Secretary Leon Panetta ask Obama for authority to order relief? Why didn’t he even ask?!

        Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        May 15, 2013 11:20 am

        Maybe the whole thing was a set up from the beginning.

        Like

      • Cheryl's avatar
        Cheryl permalink
        May 15, 2013 11:53 am

        This is perfect from Psalm 7,

        Behold, the wicked brings forth iniquity;
        Yes, he conceives trouble and brings forth falsehood.
        He made a pit and dug it out,
        And has fallen into the ditch which he made.
        His trouble shall return upon his own head,
        And his violent dealing shall come down on his own crown.

        Like

      • Cheryl's avatar
        Cheryl permalink
        May 16, 2013 11:13 am

        General Petraeus has indirectly blown the whistle. He was probably “used” in some way early in the cover-up with the purported CIA intel link to the Mohammed video, and now he feels burned. So he conclusively said via his public affairs officer that the stand-down order did not come from the CIA. Well – what outranks the CIA? Only the national security team at the White House. That means President Obama, and nobody else. Petraeus is naming Obama without naming him. If that is not quite as courageous as blowing a whistle, it is far better than the disgraceful behavior of Panetta and Dempsey.
        We do not know the facts for certain, but we do know that the rescue mission stand-down issue revolves around the granting or withholding of cross-border authority, which belongs only to President Obama. More than one hundred gung-ho Force Recon Marines were waiting on the tarmac in Sigonella, just two hours away for the launch order that never came.

        Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        May 15, 2013 7:03 pm

        Very fitting indeed Cheryl!

        Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        May 16, 2013 9:04 pm

        I think you are right, by claiming the order did not come from the CIA he has implicated Obama!

        Like

Leave a reply to lou222 Cancel reply