Skip to content

Benghazi: Whistleblower to claim Hillary Clinton gave Stinger missiles to al-Qaeda

May 21, 2013

  Where? Who? Why? These are the three big questions surrounding the Benghazi attack and the cover up which followed. Where was Barack Obama during the attack? That should be a very easy question to answer but to this point either nobody knows or they do not want to say.  Who put the youtube video language in the 12th edit of the talking points thereby changing the original–correct–motivation for the attack to the lie which was promoted for so many weeks? We still do not know who was responsible, but we do know it came from the State Department. Why was Chris Stevens in Benghazi at a time when it was known the situation on the ground was deteriorating?  If this story is true we may soon know the answer and it could be very damaging to both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

    According to the article linked to above there are more whistleblowers looking to come forward once they procure the proper legal counsel and one of them is set to testify that the United States government supplied the Libyan rebels with weapons including Stinger missiles. Once it became clear these rebels were actually part of al-Qaeda (something many of us suspected all along but apparently the Obama regime did not do its due diligence before supporting the rebels) the Obama regime sent Chris Stevens to Libya to buy back the weapons.

  But that isn’t all because the whistleblower is reportedly going to testify that the CIA (General David Petraeus) was dead set against sending these weapons to the rebels so it was the State Department which authorized the transfer of weapons because Hillary Clinton thought it was a cheap way to dispose of Qaddafi.

Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.

Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”

This left Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda – indeed, in the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the consulate and ended up killing Stevens.

  Rumors have been circulating for some time about the United States being involved in arms trafficking to the Libyan rebels and we might be about to learn that is indeed the case, and if this is the case there is no way that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama had no knowledge of what was going on in light of the claim that the CIA recused themselves from this activity.

  But the story does not end there because it is also being reported that General Ham–who had people in place to come to the rescue in Benghazi–was ordered by the WHITE HOUSE to stand down. This is in direct contrast to Barack Obama’s claim that he ordered the use of all available resources to the scene to rescue Chris Stevens before he disappeared for the night to prepare for his campaign stop in Nevada the next day.

Ham was told by the White House not to send the aid to the trapped men, but Ham decided to disobey and did so anyway, whereupon the White House “called his deputy and had the deputy threaten to relieve Ham of his command.”

General Ham was set to disobey a direct order and was threatened with disciplinary action from the White House, General ham was eventually relievd of duty after the attack anyway. I guess we now know why General Petraeus and General Ham had to go in the eyes of the White House–they knew too much.

  Now the question is, why did the White House order the stand down order once things went bad with the plot to buy back weapons it had provided to al-Qaeda? (Weapons which might actually have been used to carry out the attack.) Could it be that dead men tell no tales, or so Barack Obama thought….. 

22 Comments leave one →
  1. May 21, 2013 8:27 pm

    Oh, Steve, let’s hope this story is true and the whistle bloowers have credibility. This is what I have believed to be true from the get go. This could bring Obama and Hillary down at last. Nobodt deserves it more than those two!


    • May 21, 2013 8:48 pm

      I hope something comes from this, this is what I have believed happened from the beginning. If it is true they both are finished.


  2. May 21, 2013 8:33 pm

    This is going to get good. Fast and furious is coming back via the Dailey beast of all blogs. Chickens are coming home to roost. You might want to check out my post on the same vein.


  3. LD Jackson permalink
    May 21, 2013 9:08 pm

    Methinks something that really stinks is about to hit a very big fan.


  4. May 21, 2013 11:13 pm

    I’m with everyone here, hoping like hell that the new info is credible, and somehow verifiable. Maybe, just maybe our men didn’t die in vein. 30 years ago I’d be wondering how in hell could our government do something like this to our own people. .Knowing who’s in charge now however, makes it easy to understand, and it’s also become apparent how they’ve crafted this process, they try to dump all responsibility to their underlings, such as obamas “I told them to do everything possible”, alleviates him from immediate responsibility, so if it goes wrong, like benghazi did, they’re free to say I didn’t do it, or know about it. If it happens to work out, then of course with a huge smile and all the liberal press they can get, they grandstand, taking full responsibility for it working. Truly ruthless vicious animals in the white house. And just as bad, are the blind left lemmings, that *still* think their god king and his henchmen have done no wrong. You would think by now, with all that’s going on, they’d at least be wondering….


    • May 22, 2013 5:48 am

      If he had sent in the troops and they had rescued Chris Stevens you can rest assured we would have found out where Obama was and he would have released another photo shopped pic of him in the situation room, but he did nothing and he ordered his men to do nothing and then he tells the wold he told them to do whatever it takes.


  5. John Carey permalink
    May 22, 2013 12:10 am

    Steve, remember right after Benghazi. What was one of the first things Hillary did? She sought legal counsel. I know this has not be reported that much but I remember it. Why would she have sought legal counsel over a protest sparked by some obscure Youtube video? Remember what I said…when you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable is the truth. We’re getting closer to the truth my friend.


    • May 22, 2013 5:49 am

      You know I had totally forgotten about that John but you are right and it makes you wonder why she felt the need to get legal counsel and now we may be about to find out.


      • Cheryl permalink
        May 22, 2013 10:44 am

        Hillary’s people never intended to buy back any weapons…lies upon more lies! She makes me sick!


      • May 22, 2013 7:22 pm

        At this point we do not know what to believe from these people any more!


  6. Petermc3 permalink
    May 22, 2013 10:13 am

    Obama and his bitch operated with impunity and will most likely escape any consequences. Both have enjoyed immunity in the past and iwill continue to do so if history repeats itself I. e. the republican bumblers, a fawning media, and an indifferent public. If there are two rogue agents working in the government they are Barry and Hillary, he with his floppy ears, she with her Ponderosa ass.


    • May 22, 2013 7:23 pm

      If the only punishment Hillary gets is not being president I will take it at this point!


  7. Chris permalink
    May 22, 2013 11:07 pm

    The weapons buy back plot could also be why none of the terroist have been apprehended and why no rescue attemt was made. Knowing the terroist had stinger missles they could not send aircraft or helicopters which would have come under attack resulting in more deaths. This would have resulted in Obaoma having to explain himself and his foreign policy failure.



  1. Is The Lid About To Come Off The Benghazi Scandal? | Asylum Watch
  2. IRS, DOJ, Benghazi... Are the wheels coming off? - Page 2
  3. Samantha Power: Class act, or mendacious moral midget? | Harvard Law School Is Bogus
  4. Benghazi: Dozens of CIA operatives on the ground during the attack, survivors receiving multiple polygraph tests | America's Watchtower
  5. Benghazi: Whistleblower claims 400 missiles were stolen in Libya | America's Watchtower
  6. Benghazi: The attackers had inside information | America's Watchtower

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: