Skip to content
Advertisements

Whistleblower’s law firm broken into, computers stolen

July 8, 2013

 If this story is true it appears as if a law firm which represents at least one high profile whisleblower was broken into multiple times and the thieves made off with computers while leaving behind other high value items, leaving one to think that there was an ulterior motive behind this break in, law firms now a days don’t have the reputation that The Ladan Law Firm has, and that’s something that needs to change.

The offices of a Dallas law firm representing a high-profile State Department whistleblower were broken into last weekend. Burglars stole three computers and broke into the firm’s file cabinets. But silver bars, video equipment and other valuables were left untouched, according to local Fox affiliate KDFW, which aired security camera footage of the suspected burglars entering and leaving the offices around the time of the incident.

The firm Schulman & Mathias represents Aurelia Fedenisn, a former investigator at the State Department’s Office of the Inspector General. In recent weeks, she raised a slew of explosive allegations against the department and its contractors ranging from illicit drug use, soliciting sexual favors from minors and prostitutes and sexual harassment.

  I have to admit it seems odd this law firm would have silver bars lying around the office, but if this is the case why did the thieves leave them behind while stealing computers which potentially had information on not only the whistleblowers themselves but also the people who were having the whistle blown on them if it were not to make the evidence disappear? 

  With confidence in the Obama regime at an all time low on both the left and the right in light of all the scandals engulfing the regime one cannot help but think that this was not simply a random burglary.

Advertisements
7 Comments leave one →
  1. MaddMedic permalink
    July 8, 2013 6:51 pm

    Reblogged this on Freedom Is Just Another Word… and commented:
    I’m sure the US Government had nothing to do with this!!

    Like

    • July 8, 2013 6:58 pm

      Thanks yet again!

      Like

  2. July 8, 2013 8:50 pm

    There goes the attorney-client privilege flushed away like waste matter. The Government (NSA) was most likely listening in to the client’s electronic communications with her lawyers and decided that the only way to retrieve the damming evidence was by the old-fashioned way – a physical break in! I don’t think the powers-that-be would decide on this method and risk getting caught like Nixon’s goons in Watergate if the seriousness of the whistleblower’s revelation did not outweigh the risks. Or it could be a warning to the lawyers: Do not touch this case; we can get to you wherever or whenever we want to! I hope the whistleblower was smart enough to save copies of her evidence.

    Like

    • July 9, 2013 6:09 am

      Yeah, it seems unlikely that Obama would be stupid enough to authorize it, perhaps words did not need to be spoken because everyone knew what had to be done.

      Like

  3. July 10, 2013 9:22 am

    Reblogged this on Cmblake6's Weblog and commented:
    I tend to think that this is government desperation, trying to cover their asses. I tend to see the Watergate comparison invalid because of the cover the media has been providing for this regime. The cover for, not the cover of. At least no one died in the WG affair.

    Like

    • July 10, 2013 7:09 pm

      Thank you so much!

      Like

      • July 10, 2013 8:48 pm

        This was a superb find on your part!

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: