Skip to content

Open thread for Sunday, July 21st

July 21, 2013

Here is the open thread for Sunday, July 21st; please feel free to leave links to interesting articles and to discuss whatever issues may arise during the course of the day, nothing is off-topic here.

  As always you can follow America’s Watchtower on Facebook and Twitter by clicking on the links to the right, or you can subscribe by email and never miss a post again.

  The New Federalist Party has finished the platform and you can check it out here, we are currently seeking both donations and delegates so if you like what you see and you are interested please drop us a note and we will tell you what you need to do if you are interested in representing your state at the NFP Convention.

8 Comments leave one →
  1. TexasFred's avatar
    July 21, 2013 9:06 pm

    They want Justice for Trayvon? Justice was served…

    A jury was picked and approved by the defense and prosecution, evidence was presented, both sides made their case, the jury deliberated and a verdict was rendered… THAT is American Justice… Get over yourselves with this Justice for Trayvon BS…

    Sounds more like Vigilantes against Zimmerman to me..

    I am done with Trayvon, but I will never stop going after the RACE PIMPS that perpetuate this division in America…

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      July 22, 2013 6:02 am

      Amen Fred, they got justice. What they want at this point is revenge.

      Like

    • lou222's avatar
      lou222 permalink
      July 22, 2013 12:52 pm

      Fred, we believe that justice was served, however, this Administration will try over and over again to get the answer they want, it is just “their way”. Doesn’t matter that the jury found him not guilty, there are those out there that say “he wasn’t found to be innocent, either”. What the heck!!! At what point does the jury go the way of Congress, being unimportant and not needed?

      Like

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        July 22, 2013 6:58 pm

        If Zimmerman is tried in Federal court I would say we have reached that point!

        Like

  2. sonnyinaz's avatar
    sonnyinaz permalink
    July 22, 2013 11:34 am

    An interesting tidbit I found. And the dems claimed that Mitt was a flip flopper…

    President Obama spent part of his surprise appearance at last Friday’s White House press briefing urging that the Stand Your Ground laws that exist in 31 states be reexamined. But only nine years ago, in the Illinois state senate, he co-sponsored a bill that strengthened his state’s 1961 Stand Your Ground law.

    “It may be useful for us to examine some state and local laws to see if they are designed in such a way that they may encourage the kinds of altercations, confrontations, and tragedies as we saw in the Florida case, rather than diffuse potential altercations,” Obama said last Friday. “I know that there’s been commentary about the fact that Stand Your Ground laws in Florida were not used as a defense of the case. On the other hand, if we’re sending a message as a society in our communities that someone who is armed has a right to use those firearms even if there’s a way for them to exit from the situation, is that really going to be contributing to the kind of peace and security and order that we’d like to see?”

    “And for those who resist that idea that we should think about these Stand Your Ground laws, I just have to ask these people to consider if Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk, and do we actually think that he would have been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman who had followed him in a car because he felt threatened?” he asked.

    He went on to say, “and if the answer to that question is at least ambiguous, then it seems to me that we might want to examine those kinds of laws.”

    But the Illinois Review says Obama didn’t seem to have any of those concerns when in 2004 he co-sponsored S.B. 2386, which broadened the state’s Stand Your Ground law “by shielding the person who was attacked from being sued in civil court by perpetrators or their estates when a ’stand your ground’ defense is used in protecting his or her person, dwelling or other property.”

    S.B. 2386 passed the Illinois state senate by a 56–0 vote on March 25, 2004. It sailed through the state house with only two “nay” votes. Both chambers were controlled by Democrats.

    Stand Your Ground laws weren’t always much of a partisan issue. Florida’s law passed in 2005 after being approved unanimously in the state senate and on a 94–20 vote in the state house.

    There was little outcry about the change from minority communities. Perhaps that’s because, as The Daily Caller discovered, “African Americans benefit from Florida’s ‘Stand Your Ground” self-defense law at a rate far out of proportion to their presence in the state’s population, despite an assertion by Attorney General Eric Holder that repealing ’stand your ground’ would help African Americans.”

    A third of Florida’s Stand Your Ground claims in homicide cases are made by African-Americans, a rate nearly double the black percentage of the state’s population. The majority of those claims have been successful, a success rate that exceeds that of Florida whites.

    The Democratic Senate will be holding hearings on state Stand Your Ground laws in September. Here’s hoping some witnesses will be allowed to clear the air about the reality surrounding such laws.

    Like

  3. lou222's avatar
    lou222 permalink
    July 22, 2013 12:55 pm

    Sonny, that was then, this is now, don’t you see? They have to “tweak” it a bit to get the results they want. Most people do not pay attention, so to be told what you posted would not matter to them….they would just say it was the Right making something up. I live “Illinois” every day, I know what the Administration is made of and now the country can see it as well, or hopefully MORE of the country will see it. Good post!

    Like

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      July 22, 2013 7:00 pm

      Great new pic Lou, so cute, I love it! You are right, most people will never even learn about this because they simply not interested in learning the truth about this man.

      Like

Leave a reply to sonnyinaz Cancel reply