Benghazi: Dozens of CIA operatives on the ground during the attack, survivors receiving multiple polygraph tests
CNN (yes THAT CNN) is reporting that during the attack in Benghazi on September 11th which killed Chris Stevens (after he had been raped), Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods, and Sean Smith there were actually dozens of CIA operatives on the ground.
It goes without saying that this means that most–if not all– of the survivors are CIA operatives. We have been asking since the onset of this scandal what Chris Stevens was doing in Benghazi in the first place, but now that question must be expanded to include the CIA also. What was the CIA doing on the ground in Benghazi on that night?
The CIA, most likely at the request of Barack Obama, is doing all they can to make sure the truth never comes out, going so far as to administer multiple polygraph tests to the survivors, probably in an attempt to intimidate the potential witnesses:
CNN has learned the CIA is involved in what one source calls an unprecedented attempt to keep the spy agency’s Benghazi secrets from ever leaking out. Since January, some CIA operatives involved in the agency’s missions in Libya, have been subjected to frequent, even monthly polygraph examinations, according to a source with deep inside knowledge of the agency’s workings. The goal of the questioning, according to sources, is to find out if anyone is talking to the media or Congress,” CNN reported Thursday.
It has been reported that the Obama regime was running guns and Stinger missiles captured in Libya into Syria to support the rebels, and there was a claim that Chris Steven was actually there to buy the weapons back.
Could it be that this was what was going on when the attack took place, and could that be the reason why nobody was sent in to help while the attack was ongoing? It certainly looks as if these four American heroes were allowed to die to protect Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s gun running scandal.
And this is a phony scandal?
America's Watchtower 
“What was the CIA doing on the ground in Benghazi on that night?”
That’s question the Congressional committees have not wanted to ask for some reason. The theory that always made sence to me is the during the war in Libya, Hillary was putting arms in the hands of rebels, including surface-to-air missiles. Some of those rebels turned out to be al Qaeda and so the CIA was over ther in Benghazi trying to clean-up her mess by buying back those arms and missiles. That would explain why they intention had a very small security force there.
It makes sense what you say, Steve, that the CIA is giving the lie detector test to keep the agents quiet.
LikeLike
I agree Jim and I think this is exactly what was going on and that is what Obama and Hillary are trying to hide.
LikeLike
There is a reason for all things Benghazi. It may be that guns were being ran,etc. What we know for sure is that President Obama and his administration has no intention of letting us know the truth.
LikeLike
There was definitely something going on over there that they do not want us to know about. how quickly they came up with the video excuse tells me they had that in the bag just in case something went wrong, otherwise they would have just told us they didn’t know the details yet and would have to wait.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on disturbeddeputy and commented:
IT JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER, OR DIRTIER.
LikeLike
Thank you.
LikeLike
We need a Special Investigator with subpena power. Petraeus needs to be deposed and asked to explain the CIA program in Benghazi (yes in an open public hearing). Here is what needs to be asked: What was the CIA doing in Benghazi? Did the CIA know about the Islamist in Benghazi. If they didn’t why didn’t they? Why did it take the CIA 50 minutes to get the consulate? What did he and Hillary talk about on 9/11? Did BO know/approve of the CIA mission?
LikeLike
Agreed! There is no doubt in my mind that the Obama regime was holding the affair over his head, but when he came clean they couldn’t use it anymore. Part of me likes to think that is why he came clean over the affair.
LikeLike
What makes you think Patraeus came clean on the Broadwell affair? Yes, he admitted to that affair, but what about the curious case of Jill Kelley? I doubt Broadwell was Patraeus’ “first rodeo” as they say. And if Broadwell was all they had on Patraeus, why would he not come totally clean now, and blow this Benghazi investigation wide open? Surely, he knows exactly what was going on there; what Hillary’s role was; that Obama and Rice lied massively about the cause of the “protest”, and many other pertinent, startling and highly damaging facts about Benghazi. Combine that with the fact he’s a life-long military man where integrity and honor were endlessly championed. Also, those under him always considered him a man of great integrity. And believe me, as a retired officer I can tell you, we all knew which generals were truly honest and which you could never trust–Patraeus was always the former. If keeping the Broadwell trysts were all that was previously holding him back, he would have sworn on the Bible and spilled all the beans by now. And in the process, redeemed much of his horribly tarnished legacy with all those who served with and under him. There is definitely more skeletons in the Patraeus closet; only time will tell if that closet is ever opened.
LikeLike
Is there anywhere they aren’t running guns?
LikeLike
It would appear not.
LikeLike
The simple fact could be State Department and CIA employees on the ground in Benghazi were not aware of each others missions. Stevens was working with Libyan officials to transfer missiles from Libya through Turkey to Syrian rebels. He may not have known all the details of who possessed the missiles. The CIA could have been buying back the missiles or exchanging missiles for other weapons in order for the Libyan government to have the missiles.
The Obama Admin. nowing that the Libyans rebels had missiles could have caused them not to send help because of the risk of escalating the situation into a full blown diplomatic SANFU
LikeLike
At this point we do not know who knew what when it comes to the people on the ground over there, but they do know what happened during the attack and we need to hear what they have to say.
LikeLike
I still recall Clinton’s response at the hearing when asked. She looked startled then said , no we are not running guns through Turkey which was the question. Bet it maybe through Israel? But someway they are doing it.
LikeLike
Yeah, she only said she didn’t know if Turkey was involved, but she did leave the door open to the fact that guns may be being moved.
LikeLike
The one glaring difference between the snuffings of Ron Brown and Chris Stevens is that the former boarded a plane before his lips were forever sealed while the later got off a plane before his arranged sacrifice for the benefit of the gun runner in chief.
LikeLike
But the end result was the same!
LikeLike
Yeah, one less democrat.
LikeLike